시제의 학교문법 기술 - 그 문제와 개선방향 모색을 위하여
Describing Korean Tense in Textbooks - focussing on government-designed and current textbooks
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Tense is one of the important grammatical categories in Korean. So we should not omit this when we describe Korean Grammar. There are so many different opinions on this category. As a natural consequence, it is so difficult to describe tense in Korean grammar textbooks and there are currently many problems in them. In this paper, I analysed how Korean tense is described in Korean grammar textbooks, focusing the first and last government-designed grammar textbooks and the current officially authorized textbooks. I have finally found out problems as the following; 1. The sub-categorization of tense as present, past and future 2. One grammatical form with multiple meanings 3. Introducing relative time reference 4. The discrepancies among textbooks I also proposed solutions for these problems; 1. We should sub-categorize Korean tense into past and non-past. 2. We should describe one form by one meaning as much as we can. 3. We don't have to introduce relative time reference to Korean tense. 4. We should try to minimize the discrepancies among textbooks.
Abstract
Tense is one of the important grammatical categories in Korean. So we should not omit this when we describe Korean Grammar. There are so many different opinions on this category. As a natural consequence, it is so difficult to describe tense in Korean grammar textbooks and there are currently many problems in them. In this paper, I analysed how Korean tense is described in Korean grammar textbooks, focusing the first and last government-designed grammar textbooks and the current officially authorized textbooks. I have finally found out problems as the following; 1. The sub-categorization of tense as present, past and future 2. One grammatical form with multiple meanings 3. Introducing relative time reference 4. The discrepancies among textbooks I also proposed solutions for these problems; 1. We should sub-categorize Korean tense into past and non-past. 2. We should describe one form by one meaning as much as we can. 3. We don't have to introduce relative time reference to Korean tense. 4. We should try to minimize the discrepancies among textbooks.
참고문헌 (20)
- 교육부, "고등학교 문법" (1990), 대한교과서주식회사
- 교육인적자원부, "고등학교 문법" (2010), 두산
- 남기심, "현대 국어 시제에 관한 문제", 국어국문학, 55·57(합병), pp.55~57 (1972)
- 남기심, "표준국어문법론" (2011), 탑출판사
- 문숙영, "한국어의 시제 범주" (2009), 태학사
- 박덕유, "현행(제7차)文法 교과서 내용 분석", 문법교육, 1, pp.89~139 (2004), 한국문법교육학회
- 박영목, "고등학교 독서와 문법" (2012), 천재교육
- 성낙수, "국어 문법 교육의 문제점", 문법교육, 1, pp.141~160 (2004), 한국문법교육학회
- 윤여탁, "고등학교 독서와 문법" (2012), (주)미래엔
- 이관규, "문법 교과서의 변천", 문법교육, 1, pp.45~88 (2004), 한국문법교육학회
- 이남호, "고등학교 독서와 문법" (2012), 비상교육
- 이병규, "문법 영역의 내용 선정 방법 연구", 문법교육, 4, pp.95~130 (2006), 한국문법교육학회
- 이삼형, "고등학교 독서와 문법" (2012), 지학사
- 이익섭, "국어문법론" (1983), 학연사
- 이재성, "한국어의 시제와 상" (2001), 국학자료원
- 주시경, "국어문법" (1910), 박문서관
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1984), 정음문화사
- 최현배, "새로운 말본" (1978), 정음사
- 허재영, "문법 교육과정 변천", 문법교육, 1, pp.1~43 (2004), 한국문법교육학회
- 허재영, "문법 교육의 내용과 교수-학습 이론 변천사", 문법교육, 4, pp.29~64 (2006), 한국문법교육학회