한국어 연결어미 '-았자'에 대한 고찰
A Study on the Connective Ending '-atja' of Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to describe the grammatical characteristics and meaning of conjunctive ending ‘-atja’ by analyzing the use of ‘-atja’ in actual language data. To achieve this goal, I examined the morpho‧syntactic characteristics and meaning of the two forms of ‘-atja’ and ‘-a bwatja’ shown in the actual corpus with a sense of question about the existing discussions seen in grammatically incorrect or unnatural sentences when the concessive conjunctive ending ‘-atja’ was used alone without combining with the auxiliary predicate ‘boda’. Through this process, this study shows that the connective ending ‘-atja’ does not combine with the auxiliary predicate ‘boda’ but has meaning of ‘denial of expectation’, and that ‘-atja’ is an independent connective ending. In addition, by comparing ‘-atja’ with ‘-a bwatja’, this study demonstrates that ‘-a bwatja’ has a different syntactic constraint from ‘-atja’ and the semantic function which reveals negative meaning of the following clause more strongly.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to describe the grammatical characteristics and meaning of conjunctive ending ‘-atja’ by analyzing the use of ‘-atja’ in actual language data. To achieve this goal, I examined the morpho‧syntactic characteristics and meaning of the two forms of ‘-atja’ and ‘-a bwatja’ shown in the actual corpus with a sense of question about the existing discussions seen in grammatically incorrect or unnatural sentences when the concessive conjunctive ending ‘-atja’ was used alone without combining with the auxiliary predicate ‘boda’. Through this process, this study shows that the connective ending ‘-atja’ does not combine with the auxiliary predicate ‘boda’ but has meaning of ‘denial of expectation’, and that ‘-atja’ is an independent connective ending. In addition, by comparing ‘-atja’ with ‘-a bwatja’, this study demonstrates that ‘-a bwatja’ has a different syntactic constraint from ‘-atja’ and the semantic function which reveals negative meaning of the following clause more strongly.
참고문헌 (19)
- 강현화, "한국어교육 문법 자료편" (2016), 한글파크
- 구종남, "보조용언의 의미와 문법", pp.145~168 (2013), 경진
- 권수정, "한국어 교육을 위한 양보관계 연결어미 연구", 인문논총, 20, pp.198~231 (2010), 서울여자대학교
- 김종록, "선어말어미 통합형 접속어미의 사전표제어 분석", 어문학, (84), pp.39~73 (2004), 한국어문학회
- 김청자, "보조용언 "보다"의 의미연구", 석사, 국어교육, pp.1983
- 백낙천, "국어의 통합형 접속어미" (2003), 월인
- 徐廷燮, "국어 양보문 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1991
- 서태룡, "문법 연구와 자료: 이익섭 선생 회갑 기념 논총", pp.435~464 (1998), 태학사
- 왕수려, "양보표현에 대한 한·중 대조 연구", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.2009
- 우상민, "국어 양보 표현의 사전 기술 방법 연구", 석사, 국어교육, pp.2008
- 우형식, "지각동사 ‘보다’의 경험과 추정", 연세어문학, 19, pp.31~52 (1986), 연세대학교
- 유현경, "조사 ‘하고’의 의미와 기능 -‘와’와의 비교를 중심으로-", 한글, 251, pp.205~231 (2001), 한글학회
- 이정택, "접속어미 ‘-자, 자마자, -았자’의 의미와 문법", 애산학보, 17, pp.71~97 (1995), 애산학회
- 이홍란, "한·중 양보문 대조 연구", 박사, pp.2016
- 이희자, "(한국어 학습용) 어미 조사 사전" (2001), 한국문화사
- 정종수, "한국어 양보 기능 요소 연구", 한국언어문화, (63), pp.213~242 (2017), 한국언어문화학회
- 최은실, "양보의 연결어미 연구 -주변적 양보 연결어미를 중심으로", 석사, pp.2016
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1971), 정음사
- 허웅, "20세기 우리말의 형태론" (1995), 샘문화사