‘-을게’와 ‘-을래’의 의미 - ‘수용’과 ‘거부’의 관점에서 -
A Study on the Meaning of ‘-eulge’ and ‘-eulrae’.
0
조회
0
다운로드
16
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Korean has variety endings as one of the characteristic features. Korean express themselves deeply and delicately with these endings. However learners of Korean as a Second language or Korean as a Foreign Language have difficulties in learning and acquiring Korean endings because of their diversity and subtle differences. ‘-eulge’ and ‘-eulrae’ is one of the difficult endings to differentiate for learners. Native Koreans distinguish and use each of them naturally and automatically. But it is a not easy to explain the differences of usages between ‘-eulge’ and ‘-eulrae’ even for native Koreans. Both of them express ‘future’ and ‘intention’. But ‘-eulrae’ is used with positive answer to ‘order’, ‘asking’, ‘suggestion’ or ‘request’. On the contrary ‘-eulge’ is used with negative answer to them. Though we could observe diverse usages of ‘-eulge’ and ‘-eulrae’ like ‘-eulge’ using for ‘making promise’ expression or ‘-eulrae’ using for expression of asking listeners intention. We could summarize their difference as ‘acceptance’ and ‘denial’. This study explains how we could classify the usage of ‘-eulge’ as acceptance of listener’s intention and the usage of ‘-eulrae’ as refusal of listener’s intention. This classification could help KSL, KFL leaners to learn them as well as teachers to teach them.
Abstract
Korean has variety endings as one of the characteristic features. Korean express themselves deeply and delicately with these endings. However learners of Korean as a Second language or Korean as a Foreign Language have difficulties in learning and acquiring Korean endings because of their diversity and subtle differences. ‘-eulge’ and ‘-eulrae’ is one of the difficult endings to differentiate for learners. Native Koreans distinguish and use each of them naturally and automatically. But it is a not easy to explain the differences of usages between ‘-eulge’ and ‘-eulrae’ even for native Koreans. Both of them express ‘future’ and ‘intention’. But ‘-eulrae’ is used with positive answer to ‘order’, ‘asking’, ‘suggestion’ or ‘request’. On the contrary ‘-eulge’ is used with negative answer to them. Though we could observe diverse usages of ‘-eulge’ and ‘-eulrae’ like ‘-eulge’ using for ‘making promise’ expression or ‘-eulrae’ using for expression of asking listeners intention. We could summarize their difference as ‘acceptance’ and ‘denial’. This study explains how we could classify the usage of ‘-eulge’ as acceptance of listener’s intention and the usage of ‘-eulrae’ as refusal of listener’s intention. This classification could help KSL, KFL leaners to learn them as well as teachers to teach them.
참고문헌 (42)
- 고영근, "서법과 양태의 상관관계, In 국어학 신연구" (1986), 탑출판사
- 고영근, "국어형태론 연구" (1989), 서울대학교 출판부
- 고영근, "표준 국어문법론" (1985), 탑출판사
- 고영근, "국어의 통사․의미론" (1986), 탑출판사
- 고창운, "“-을라, -을걸, -을게, -을래’의 의미 분석 연구", 한국어교육, (11) (1995), 한국어문교육학회
- 김기혁, "국어 문법 연구:형태․통어론" (1995), 박이정
- 김종택, "국어화용론" (1982), 형설출판사
- 김태엽, "국어종결어미의 문법" (2001), 국학자료원
- 박숙영, "의지 표현들의 의지 정도성 비교 －‘-겠어요’, ‘-(으)ㄹ거예요’, ‘-(으)ㄹ래요’, ‘-(으)ㄹ게요’를 중심으로－", 언어와 문화, 2(2), pp.21~40 (2006), 한국언어문화교육학회
- 박재연, "현대국어 반말체 종결어미 연구", 국어연구, (152) (1998), 국어연구회
- 박재연, "국어 양태 범주의 확립과 어미의 의미 기술: 인식 양태를 중심으로", 국어학, (34) (1999), 국어학회
- 박재연, "국어 양태의 화·청자 지향성과 주어 지향성", 國語學, 41, pp.249~275 (2003), 국어학회
- 박재연, "한국어 양태어미연구" (2006), 국어학회
- 백봉자, "외국어로서의 한국어 문법사전" (1999), 도서출판 하우
- 서정수, "국어문법연구" (1990), 한국문화사
- 염광호, "종결어미의 통시적 고찰" (1998), 박이정
- 윤은경, "한국어 양태 표현 연구 －종결어미 ‘-(으)ㄹ래, -(으)ㄹ게’를 대상으로－", 언어와 문화, 2(2), pp.41~63 (2006), 한국언어문화교육학회
- 이관규, "학교문법론" (2006), 월인
- 이기갑, "미정의 씨끝 ‘-으리-’와 ‘-겠-’의 역사적 교체", 말, 12(1) (1987), 연세대학교 한국어학당
- 이강정, "Epistemic Modality and Deontic Modality" (1994), Veritas
- 이숭녕, "중세국어문법" (1961), 을유문화사
- 이윤진, "한국어교육에서의 양태 표현 연구", 한국어교육, 14(1), pp.8~210 (2003), 국제한국어교육학회
- 이종희, "국어 종결어미의 의미 체계 연구", 석사, 국어국문과, pp.2004
- 임홍빈, "선어말 {-더-}와 단절의 양상", 관악어문연구, 7 (1982), 서울대 국어국문학과
- 장경희, "현대국어의 양태범주 연구" (1985), 탑출판사
- 장석진, "화용론 연구" (1985), 탑출판사
- 조경숙, "법성의 개념과 유형에 대한 논의", 호남대학교 논문집, 18 (1997)
- 최대희, "국어풀이씨의 문법화과정 연구", 석사, pp.2002
- 이상복, "‘~요’에 대한 연구, In 연세어문학7" (1976), 연세대학교
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1971), 정음사
- 한길, "국어종결어미 연구" (1991), 강원대학교 출판부
- 한재영, "한국어 교수법" (2006), 태학사
- 허용, "외국인을 위한 한국어 문법1․2" (2005), 국립국어원
- 허웅, "우리 옛말본" (1983), 샘문화사
- 허웅, "20세기 우리말의 형태론" (1995), 샘문화사
- Celce-Murcia, "The Grammar Book" (1999), Heinle & Heinle Publishers
- Past Tense Replacement and the Modal System, "Hoffman, T.R.", Computational Laboratory, Harvard University, ~, pp.17 (1966)
- Lyons, "Semantios" (1977), Cambridge Up
- Palmer, F.R., "Modality and the English Modals" (1979), Longman
- "표준한국어대사전 개정판" (2008), 국립국어원 누리집
- "외국인을 위한 한국어 문법2" (2005), 국립국어원
- 백봉자, "외국어로서의 한국어 문법사전" (1999)