대조 연구를 통한 한국어 문법 교육 방안 연구 - 일본어 피동과의 대조를 중심으로
Study on efficient teaching approach of Korean grammar through contrastive method - Focus on comparing with Japanese passive form.
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Japanese students who study Korean as a foreign language have an advantage in learning Korean compared to other students because of their similarities of Korean and Japanese. But even Japanese students have difficulties in learning Korean passive form.Korean passive form and Japanese passive form have differences in meaning and usages as well as similarities. Both Korean and Japanese have passive form as a counterpart of active form. But there are differences in usages of Korean passive form and Japanese passive form in some ways. In meanings, Korean passive form represents the actions completed and the actions done by someone. And Japanese passive form represents receiving the actions and the actions done by someone. Some of Japanese passive forms expresses the meanings of possibilities and respects according to the meanings of verbs. Korean passive form mainly represents the actions completed and Japanese passive form mainly explains the performers and the action done by them. So Korean passive forms connects with ‘-아/어 있다’ frequently and Japanese passive forms connects with ‘-てしまう’ frequently. In usages, there are some Japanese intransitive verbs which are expressed in passive way in Korean. In the other way, there are some Korean transitive verbs which are expressed in passive way in Japanese also. Therefore some of Korean passive forms could be translated into intransitive verbs of Japanese to present same meaning. In the other way, some of Japanese passive forms could be translated into transitive verbs of Korean to present same meaning. For the effective teaching of Korean passive form, we should approach the method of teaching the passive forms with the understanding of differences of Korean and Japanese passive forms.
Abstract
Japanese students who study Korean as a foreign language have an advantage in learning Korean compared to other students because of their similarities of Korean and Japanese. But even Japanese students have difficulties in learning Korean passive form.Korean passive form and Japanese passive form have differences in meaning and usages as well as similarities. Both Korean and Japanese have passive form as a counterpart of active form. But there are differences in usages of Korean passive form and Japanese passive form in some ways. In meanings, Korean passive form represents the actions completed and the actions done by someone. And Japanese passive form represents receiving the actions and the actions done by someone. Some of Japanese passive forms expresses the meanings of possibilities and respects according to the meanings of verbs. Korean passive form mainly represents the actions completed and Japanese passive form mainly explains the performers and the action done by them. So Korean passive forms connects with ‘-아/어 있다’ frequently and Japanese passive forms connects with ‘-てしまう’ frequently. In usages, there are some Japanese intransitive verbs which are expressed in passive way in Korean. In the other way, there are some Korean transitive verbs which are expressed in passive way in Japanese also. Therefore some of Korean passive forms could be translated into intransitive verbs of Japanese to present same meaning. In the other way, some of Japanese passive forms could be translated into transitive verbs of Korean to present same meaning. For the effective teaching of Korean passive form, we should approach the method of teaching the passive forms with the understanding of differences of Korean and Japanese passive forms.
참고문헌 (47)
- 고영근, "우리말문법론" (2008), 집문당
- 고영근, "국어형태론연구" (1989), 서울대학교 출판부
- 고영근, "단어·문장·텍스트" (1995), 한국문화사
- 고영근, "우리말문법론" (2008), 집문당
- 고영근, "국어형태론연구" (1989), 서울대학교 출판부
- 고영근, "단어·문장·텍스트" (1995), 한국문화사
- 고영근, "표준중세국어문법론" (1995), 탑출판사
- 구노, "新日本文法硏究" (1991), 大修館書店
- 기타무라다다시, "보조동사 '(-어)지-'의 의미", 국어교육, 100, pp.327~355 (1999), 국어교육학회
- 기타무라 다다시, "한국어 피동 표현 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2004
- 김기혁, "국어문법연구-형태·통어론" (1995), 박이정
- 金英姬, "日·韓兩國語의 受動表現에 관한 對照考察", 석사, 일어일문학, pp.1993
- 김희선, "한국어교육에서의 사동문 연구: 일본인 중급 학습자를 중심으로", 석사, 외국어로서의한국어교육, pp.2003
- 남기심, "표준국어문법론" (1993), 탑출판사
- 남성우, "언어교수이론과 한국어교육" (2006), 한국문화사
- 서정수, "국어문법" (1994), 뿌리깊은나무
- 성광수, "국어 간접피동에 대하여", 문법연구, 3, pp.159~182 (1976), 문법연구회
- 안증환, "능동구조의 한국어와 피동구조의 일본어" (2002), 제이앤씨
- 양정석, "국어동사의 의미분석과 연결어미" (1995), 박이정
- 우인혜, "우리말 피동연구" (1997), 한국문화사
- 이문자, "朝鮮語の受身と日本語の受身(その1)", 朝鮮學報, 91, pp.15~31 (1979), 조선학회
- 이성규, "日本語の受動文における動作主と原因", 日本學報, 32, pp.181~224 (1994), 한국일본학회
- 이익섭, "한국어문법" (2005), 서울대학교 출판부
- 이익섭, "국어통사의미론" (1983), 탑출판사
- 이익섭, "국어문법론" (1983), 학연사
- 이정택, "피동표현 교수모형 개발을 위한 기초연구", Proceedings of The 12th International Conference on Korean Linguistics, pp.124~125 (2000), 국제한국어학회
- 이정택, "피동성 표현에 관한 연구(‘되다, 받다, 당하다’를 대상으로)", 한글, 251, pp.143~166 (2001), 한글학회
- 이정택, "피동문의 능동주 표지 선택 원리 - 통사적 절차에 의한 피동 표현을 중심으로 -", 국어교육, (110), pp.11~320 (2003), 한국어교육학회
- 이정택, "목적이 있는 피동문에 관한 연구", 배달말, (32), pp.211~227 (2003), 배달말학회
- 이정택, "능동주 표지의 본질과 피동의 범주화", 한글, (262), pp.149~169 (2003), 한글학회
- 이정택, "韓·日語 피동 범주 대조 및 일본어 사용자를 위한 한국어 피동 범주 교수·학습 방법 연구", 국어교육, (116), pp.197~220 (2005), 한국어교육학회
- 이효숙, "한국어교육에서의 효율적인 피동 교수 방안 : 한·일 대조 분석을 중심으로", 석사, 외국어로서의한국어교육, pp.2004
- 임호빈, "외국인을 위한 한국어문법" (1997), 연세대학교 출판부
- 임홍빈, "-을", 를 조사의 의미와 통사, 1980, pp.2, 91~130[DOI]
- 전나영, "일본어권 학습자를 위한 한국어 교육(한국어 피동성 표현의 교수 모형)" (2003), 경진문화사
- 조인정, "피동문 동작주 표시 제약", 한국어교육, 15(3), pp.229~251 (2004), 국제한국어교육학회
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1978), 정음사
- 하시모토, "助詞·助動詞の硏究" (1969), 岩波書店
- 허명자, "日本語と韓國語の受身文の對照硏究" (2004), ひつじ書房
- 허용, "대조언어학" (2014), 소통
- 박지현, "일본어권 한국어 학습자의 피동표현 사용 양상 연구", 朝鮮語教育－理論と実践－, (4) (2009), 朝鮮語敎育學會
- 小林ミナ, "よくわかる敎授法" (2008), アルク
- 丸山敬介, "敎え方の基本" (2003), 凡人社
- 丸山敬介, "受業の組み立て" (2004), 凡人社
- "외국인을 위한 한국어 문법2" (2005), 국립국어원
- 백봉자, "외국어로서의 한국어 문법사전" (1999)
- 石少川有里子, "日本語文型辭典" (1998), くろしお出版