Using Computer-Assisted Synchronous Peer Assessment Program in the EFL Formal Presentation Class
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
In order to examine viability of implementing peer assessment practice in an EFL classroom setting, the study addressed two research questions related to (1) reliability of peer assessment and (2) development of peer assessing behavior across two assessments. Fifty-six undergraduate students at a university in Korea participated in the study by both performing individual presentations and assessing their peer performances. The findings on the first assessment showed that peer assessment was different from instructor assessment―the students rated much higher than the instructor. In the second assessment, however, the student evaluators rated peer presentation quality quite similarly to the way the instructor did. Looking at the development of student ability to assess peers over certain period of time, the results indicate that student rating behavior of the first assessment significantly differs from that of the second assessment; the students became more critical in evaluating peer presentations based on better understanding of assessment criteria in the second assessment. It is claimed that student ability to assess peers can be developed.
참고문헌 (34)
- Alderson,J. C, "Do corpora have a role in language assessment", pp.248~259 (1996)
- Billington,H, "Poster presentations peer assessment", 311, pp.218~220 (1997)
- Brief, A. P, "Peer assessment revisited", 88, pp.78~79 (1980)
- Brindley, C, "Peer assessment in undergraduate programmes", 3(1), pp.79~89 (1998)
- Brown, S, "Assessing learners in higher education" (1994)
- Burnett, W, "Peer assessment by fifth year students of surgery", 5, pp.273~278 (1980)
- Campbell, K. S, "Peer versus self assessment of oral business presentation performance", 64(3), pp.23~42 (2001)
- Carlson, R. E, "Classroom public speaking assessment", 44, pp.87~97 (1995)
- & Lounsbury, "An investigation of user acceptance of peer evaluations", pp.567~579 (1980)
- DeNisi, A. S, "Potential problems with peer ratings Academy of Management Journal", pp.457~464 (1983)
- Dudley-Evans, T, "Developments in English for specific purposes" (1998), Cambridge University Press
- Falchikov, N. C, "Learning from peer feedback marking", pp.411~416 (1994)
- Fry, S. A, "Implementation and evaluation of peer marking in higher education", 15, pp.187~189 (1990)
- Glser, J, "Advantages and dangers of 'remote' peer evaluation", 14(3), pp.186~199
- Hwang, H, "A study of the ESP curriculum for international conference communication", 18(1), pp.37~56 (2002)
- Kim, H, "The use of peer-assessment on PowerPoint group presentation", 10(1), pp.155~176 (2007)
- Love, K. G, "Comparison of peer assessment methods", 66, pp.451~457 (1981)
- Maes,J. D, "A managerial perspective", 34(1), pp.67~80 (1997)
- Magin, D, "Improving the reliability of multiple peer assessments by removing marker variability", pp.547~552 (1999), Griffith University, Brisbane
- Magin, D, "Reciprocity as a source of bias in multiple peer assessment of group work", 26(1), pp.53~64 (2001)
- McEvoy, G. M, "User acceptance of peer appraisals in an industrial setting", 40, pp.785~797 (1987)
- Mendona, C. O, "Peer review negotiations", 28, pp.745~769 (1994)
- Mowl, G, "Using self and peer assessment to improve students' essay writing", 32, pp.324~335 (1995)
- Parker, R. J, "The effects of evaluative context on performance", 29(8), pp.807~822 (2001)
- Powel, M, "Presentation as performance", 32(1), pp.1~8 (1999)
- Reinsch, Jr. N. L, "What communication abilities do practitioners need? Evidence from MBA students", 60(4), pp.7~29 (1997)
- Saavedra, R, "Peer evaluation in self-managing work groups", 78, pp.450~462 (1993)
- Sherrard, W. R, "An empirical study of peer bias in evaluations Journal of Education for Business", pp.43~47 (1994)
- Stefani, "Studies in Higher Education", pp.69~75 (1994)
- Bridgeford, "Avoiding bias in the assessment of communication skills", pp.135~141 (1985)
- Stubblebine,P. C, "Perception and acceptance of evaluations by supervisors and peers", 20(1), pp.85~94 (2001)
- Swanson, "Strategies for student assessment The challenge of problem based learning", pp.260~273 (1991)
- Villamil, "Peer revision in the L2 classroom and aspects of social behavior Journal of Second Language Writing", pp.51~76 (1996)
- Zazanis, M. M., "Identifying motivation^interpersonal performance using peer evaluations", 13(2), pp.73~88 (2001), OrganizationDoes the speech include Introduction-Body-Conclusion?9