영어권 학습자의 한국어 관형사형 어미 오류 분석

Abstract

Jun, Young-A. 2004. An Error analysis of English-Speaking Learners' use of the Korean Attribute forms. The Language and Culture, Vol.1, 83-101. The purpose of this study is to analyze English-speaking learners' errors in using Korean Attributive forms. To analyze the errors, I used not only the compositions written by English-speaking learners form various Korean language institutes, but also a questionnaire where the learners had to fill in the blanks in sentences using Korean attributive forms. The followings are the types of errors analyzed in this study. I also suggested how teachers could explain these errors to learners. 영어권 학습자의 한국어 관형사형 어미 오류 분석 First, common morphologic errors were made when the attributive forms come after the tense pre-final endings. Anther type of morphologic error is using ‘-어-’ or ‘-으-’ in front of ‘-는’ or ‘-던’. Therefore, teachers should explain when to use tense pre-final endings in front of the attributive forms and when not to use them. Korean tense pre-final endings. ‘-겠’ and ‘-았’ can come in front of ‘-던’ but not in front of ‘-는, 을, 은’. even if the preceding consonant starting attributive forms such as ‘-는’, or ‘-던’, but ‘-으’ has to be used in front of ‘-ㄹ’ or ‘-ㄴ’. Second, learners confused ‘-(으)ㄹ’ and ‘-는’ when ‘-는’ has meaning other than present progressive. The difference between ‘-(으)ㄹ’ and ‘-는’ can be explained through the idea of the speaker's intention. '-(으)ㄹ'conveys the speaker's intention while ‘-는’ does not. Third, ‘-던’, ‘-았던’ and ‘-(으)ㄴ’ were confused by learners. ‘-(으)ㄴ’ represents ‘past perfective’, while ‘-던’ represents ‘past imperfective’. ‘Imperfective’ can be either progressive, habitual, repetitive, or incompletion. ‘-았던’ can be used instead of ‘-(으)ㄴ’ or ‘-던’ for most of cases except ‘incompletion’. (Hankuk University of Foreign Studies)