본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

담화 유형과 화행 기능과의 상관성 연구

A Study on the Relationship between Types of Ciscourse and Speech Acts.

0

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This study examined the relationship between frequent speech acts in a discourse and the type of discourse related to these speech acts. A discourse or a text is the sequence in which speech acts are structured systematically, so speech acts are regarded as basic unit of a text or a discourse. Therefore, to demonstrate its function and nature of discourse, the investigation on the function of individual speech act constructing a discourse has to be preceeded. This study collected a variety of discourse samples, categorized them according to several types, and then investigated the function of speech act respectively. However, the results do not show a distinct relationship between discourse types and the function of each speech act.

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between frequent speech acts in a discourse and the type of discourse related to these speech acts. A discourse or a text is the sequence in which speech acts are structured systematically, so speech acts are regarded as basic unit of a text or a discourse. Therefore, to demonstrate its function and nature of discourse, the investigation on the function of individual speech act constructing a discourse has to be preceeded. This study collected a variety of discourse samples, categorized them according to several types, and then investigated the function of speech act respectively. However, the results do not show a distinct relationship between discourse types and the function of each speech act.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 강범모, "한국어의 텍스트 장르, 문체, 유형" (2000), 태학사
  2. 강범모, "통계적 방법에 의한 한국어 텍스트 유형 및 문체 분석", 언어학, (22) (2000)
  3. 강창우, "화행 유형의 하위 분류 가능성과 그 문제점", 독어학, 9 (2004), 한국독어학회
  4. 고인환, "텍스트유형-분류기준에 관한 비판적 고찰", 독일어문학, 8 (1998)
  5. 김갑년, "텍스트유형의 화행론적 연구", 독일문학, 74 (2000), 한국독어독문학회
  6. 김미령, "전달 목적 화행의 유형 설정에 대한 시도", 우리말연구, 17 (2005), 우리말학회
  7. 김미령, "반응요구 화행의 유형 설정", 한민족어문학, 49 (2006), 한민족어문학회
  8. 김재영, "화행의 기본 범주: 행위 선언과 견해 표명", 우리어문연구, 10(1), pp.419~445 (1997)
  9. 박영철, "기능적 텍스트유형 분류", 독일어문학, 3 (1995), 일어문학회
  10. 박진용, "국어과 교육의 텍스트유형 분류", 청람어문학, 20 (1998), 청람어문교육학회
  11. 안병길, "담화유형, 텍스트유형 및 장르", ~ (2002)
  12. 서혁, "담화의 기능 및 유형", 국어교육학연구, 5 (1995), 국어교육학회
  13. 이도영, "국어과 교육과정에 나타난 텍스트 유형에 대한 비판적 검토", 텍스트언어학, 22 (2007)
  14. 이민선, "기능에 기초한 한국어 문법 교수 방안 연구", 석사, pp.2004
  15. Austin, John L, "How to do Things With Words" (1962), Oxford University Press.
  16. Beaugrande, R A, "Introduction to Text Linguistics" (1981), Longman
  17. Brinker, K, "Linguistiche Textanalyse" (1985), Erich Schmidt Verlag GmbH Co
  18. Cook, G, "Discourse" (2003), Oxford University Press
  19. Searle, John R, "Speech Acts:An Essay in the Philosophy of Language" (1969), Cambridge University Press
  20. Searle, John R, "Indirect speech acts, Expression and Meaning" (1979), Cambridge University Press
  21. Yule, G, "Pragmatics" (1996), Oxford University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)