본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

韓國과 中國의 辱說 文化

Abusive Culture of Korea and China.

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

Abusive Language is the negative language expressions used when insulting or cursing persons. This is one of the forms of frustration aggression. It might be said that the linguistic offensive act of bursting out occurs when people are ignored or some desires collapsed. A human being has personality and morality as the lord of all creatures, and therefore if they reveal their animal instinct to others or break the moral standards, they would be condemned. The rate of this phenomenon appears remarkably in the countries based on Confucian culture. The ratio of abusive language related to sex and animals shows very highly in Korea and China. Both countries have a similar cultural background, specifically that of Confucian culture. Therefore, they have very similar moral sense and ethical consciousness. The abusive language through an insult or debasement of someone or something directly referring undesirable appearance, moral imperfection, low social position, physical or mental disability, undesirable family line, excrement and excretion and immoral sexual relationship has many similarities in countries with Confucian culture. The ones related to animals and punishment have many differences relatively because of the differences of metaphorical expressions and the means for punishment. Accordingly they have differences in the midst of similarities. There are remarkable differences in not only the content but the frequency in both countries’ abusive language culture. Chinese abusive language related to physical and mental disabilities and a talkative behavior among behaviors show very high frequency. Also, the rate of abusive language related to the extinction of one’s family line among ones related to the preservation of lineage appears highly. On the contrary, in Korean abusive language, the ones related to disease, death, excrement and excretion appear frequently. Hence Korean ones have more abstraction compared with Chinese ones. In indirect abusive language, there is the difference in content and frequency. In ones related to a punishment, there is difference in the content. The rate of frequency of what is higher in Korea. In ones related to animals, “rabbit, turtle and pig” are used in the ones related to sex and “cow, bear, pig and donkey” are used in ones related to intelligent ability in China. This is the typical tendency in Chinese abusive language. Also, a high frequency of them appear. The culture of abusive language has many differences in indirect expressions especially between Korean and Chinese ones, even though they have many similarities. Therefore, as mentioned before, it could be concluded that between Chinese abusive language and Korean ones many differences and similarities show at the same time.

Abstract

Abusive Language is the negative language expressions used when insulting or cursing persons. This is one of the forms of frustration aggression. It might be said that the linguistic offensive act of bursting out occurs when people are ignored or some desires collapsed. A human being has personality and morality as the lord of all creatures, and therefore if they reveal their animal instinct to others or break the moral standards, they would be condemned. The rate of this phenomenon appears remarkably in the countries based on Confucian culture. The ratio of abusive language related to sex and animals shows very highly in Korea and China. Both countries have a similar cultural background, specifically that of Confucian culture. Therefore, they have very similar moral sense and ethical consciousness. The abusive language through an insult or debasement of someone or something directly referring undesirable appearance, moral imperfection, low social position, physical or mental disability, undesirable family line, excrement and excretion and immoral sexual relationship has many similarities in countries with Confucian culture. The ones related to animals and punishment have many differences relatively because of the differences of metaphorical expressions and the means for punishment. Accordingly they have differences in the midst of similarities. There are remarkable differences in not only the content but the frequency in both countries’ abusive language culture. Chinese abusive language related to physical and mental disabilities and a talkative behavior among behaviors show very high frequency. Also, the rate of abusive language related to the extinction of one’s family line among ones related to the preservation of lineage appears highly. On the contrary, in Korean abusive language, the ones related to disease, death, excrement and excretion appear frequently. Hence Korean ones have more abstraction compared with Chinese ones. In indirect abusive language, there is the difference in content and frequency. In ones related to a punishment, there is difference in the content. The rate of frequency of what is higher in Korea. In ones related to animals, “rabbit, turtle and pig” are used in the ones related to sex and “cow, bear, pig and donkey” are used in ones related to intelligent ability in China. This is the typical tendency in Chinese abusive language. Also, a high frequency of them appear. The culture of abusive language has many differences in indirect expressions especially between Korean and Chinese ones, even though they have many similarities. Therefore, as mentioned before, it could be concluded that between Chinese abusive language and Korean ones many differences and similarities show at the same time.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 김상윤, "욕설의 특질에 관한 연구" (2002), 전통화법과 화법교육
  2. 김열규, "욕-그 카다르시스의 미학" (1997), 사계절
  3. 김현태, "중국어 욕설 표현의 유형 및 특징 고찰", 중국학, (28), pp.121~148 (2007), 대한중국학회
  4. 박갑수, "국어의 표현과 순화론" (1984), 지학사
  5. 박갑수, "국어교육과 한국어교육의 성찰" (2005), 서울대학교 출판부
  6. 박갑수, "한중 동물 관련 욕설 문화, 비교 대조를 통한 언어문화교육", 한국언어문화교육학회, 제6차 국제학술회의 (2012)
  7. 박연배, "중국 욕설 연구", 석사, pp.2001
  8. 서인석, "욕설고", 국어국문학, (22) (1960), 국어국문학회
  9. 孫晉泰, "朝鮮辱說考", 신생(新生), 4(1) (1931), 新生社
  10. 신기상, "우리말 辱說 硏究", 국어교육, (79) (1992), 한국국어교육연구회
  11. 윤석규, "한ㆍ중 속어 비교 연구", 석사, pp.2003
  12. 이주행, "한국어 사회방언과 지역방언의 이해" (2007), 한국문화사
  13. 赤祖父哲二, "日中英 言語文化事典" (2000), マクミランランゲ-ジハウス
  14. 陳原, "中國のことばと社會" (1992), 大修館書店
  15. 筒井康隆, "惡口雜言罵詈讒謗, 缺陷百科ア-ン" (1970), 河出書房新社
  16. 星野命, "現代惡口論", 言語生活, 321 (1978), 筑摩書院
  17. 堀內克明, "罵倒語の比較文化", 言語生活, 321 (1978), 筑摩書院
  18. 藤江在史, "ことばから見た中國" (1971), 自治日報社 出版局
  19. Hayakawa, S. I., "Language in thought and action, second edition" (1964), Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc.

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)