본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Output, Feedback, Technology, and L2 Vocabulary Learning

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The present study compared three types of L2 vocabulary learning methods to investigate the effect of output in relation to vocabulary feedback: No Output and No Feedback (NO-NF); Output and No Feedback (O-NF); and Output and Feedback (O-F). The O-F method employed technology-enhanced feedback to overcome limitations in providing timely feedback in class. A total of 100 undergraduates in Korea took a vocabulary pretest, were divided into three groups, and received instruction for six weeks according to the group in which they were placed. Following the instructional period, participants took a posttest and completed a student satisfaction survey. The vocabulary posttest results showed a significant difference between the NO-NF and O-F groups, as well as between the O-NF and O-F groups. Regarding student satisfaction, a significant difference was found between the NO-NF and O-F groups, as well as the O-NF and O-F groups. Interestingly, there was no significant difference between the NO-NF and O-NF groups in terms of student learning outcomes or student satisfaction. Overall, the O-F group performed the best on the vocabulary posttest, and earned the highest mean scores on the student satisfaction survey. Implications for teachers regarding L2 vocabulary learning are discussed accordingly.

Abstract

The present study compared three types of L2 vocabulary learning methods to investigate the effect of output in relation to vocabulary feedback: No Output and No Feedback (NO-NF); Output and No Feedback (O-NF); and Output and Feedback (O-F). The O-F method employed technology-enhanced feedback to overcome limitations in providing timely feedback in class. A total of 100 undergraduates in Korea took a vocabulary pretest, were divided into three groups, and received instruction for six weeks according to the group in which they were placed. Following the instructional period, participants took a posttest and completed a student satisfaction survey. The vocabulary posttest results showed a significant difference between the NO-NF and O-F groups, as well as between the O-NF and O-F groups. Regarding student satisfaction, a significant difference was found between the NO-NF and O-F groups, as well as the O-NF and O-F groups. Interestingly, there was no significant difference between the NO-NF and O-NF groups in terms of student learning outcomes or student satisfaction. Overall, the O-F group performed the best on the vocabulary posttest, and earned the highest mean scores on the student satisfaction survey. Implications for teachers regarding L2 vocabulary learning are discussed accordingly.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. Ada, M. B., "Using mobile learning and social media to enhance learner feedback : Some empirical evidence", Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 9(1), pp.70~90 (2017)
  2. Adams, R., "Explicit and implicit feedback, modified output, and SLA:Does explicit and implicit feedback promote learning and learner-learner interactions?", The Modern Language Journal, 95(Supplementary), pp.42~63 (2011)
  3. Crossley, S., "A usage-based investigation of L2 lexical acquisition : The role of input and output", The Modern Language Journal, 100(3), pp.702~715 (2016)
  4. Curtis, R., "Love Actually" (2004), Pearson Education Limited
  5. De la Fuente, M., "Negotiation and oral acquisition of L2 vocabulary", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(1), pp.81~112 (2002)
  6. De la Fuente, M., "Classroom L2 vocabulary acquisition : Investigating the role of pedagogical tasks and form-focused instruction", Language Teaching Research, 10(3), pp.263~295 (2006)
  7. Dilans, G., "Corrective feedback and L2 vocabulary development : Prompts and recasts in the adult ESL classroom", The Canadian Modern Language Review, 66(6), pp.787~815 (2010)
  8. Fitzpatrick, T., "The challenge of validation : Assessing the performance of a test of productive vocabulary", Language Testing, 27(4), pp.537~554 (2010)
  9. Gurzynski-Weiss, L., "Tasks, teacher feedback, and learner modified output in naturally occurring classroom interaction", Language Learning, 62(3), pp.851~879 (2012)
  10. Hudson, T., "Teaching second language reading" (2007), Oxford University Press
  11. Hulstijn, J., "Some empirical evidence for the Involvement Load Hypothesis in vocabulary learning", Language Learning, 51(3), pp.539~558 (2001)
  12. 고명희, "Korean University Student Use of Phrasal and One-Word Verbs and Concordance-Based Learning.", 응용언어학, 21(2), pp.19~40 (2005), 한국응용언어학회
  13. 고명희, "한국 대학생들을 위한 어휘학습법: 모형 개발 및 실행과 학습자 성취도 평가", 영어교육연구, 23(2), pp.69~98 (2011), 팬코리아영어교육학회
  14. Laufer, B., "A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability", Language Testing, 16(1), pp.33~51 (1999)
  15. Lee, I., "Research into practice : Written corrective feedback", Language Teaching, 46(1), pp.108~119 (2013)
  16. Lee, S. H., "From receptive to productive : Improving ESL learners’ use of vocabulary in a postreading composition task", TESOL Quarterly, 40(2), pp.295~320 (2006)
  17. Li, S., "The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA : A meta-analysis", Language Learning, 60(2), pp.309~365 (2010)
  18. Liao, Y., "Avoidance of phrasal verbs : The case of Chinese learners of English", Language Learning, 54(2), pp.193~226 (2004)
  19. Lyster, R., "Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms", Language Teaching, 46(1), pp.1~40 (2013)
  20. Nakata, T., "Effects of feedback timing on second language vocabulary learning: Does delaying feedback increase learning?", Language Teaching Research, 19(4), pp.416~434 (2015)
  21. Nassaji, H., "Collaborative and individual output tasks and their effects on learning English phrasal verbs", Language Teaching Research, 14(4), pp.397~419 (2010)
  22. Nation, P., "Learning vocabulary in another language" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  23. Rassaei E., "Effects of three forms of reading-based output activity on L2 vocabulary learning", Language Teaching Research, 19(1), pp.1~20 (2015)
  24. Scheeler, M., "Using technology to deliver immediate corrective feedback to pre-service teachers", Journal of Behavioral Education, 11, pp.231~241 (2002)
  25. Shin, N., "Institution’s presence: Its significance to distance learning", Global E-Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 2(1), pp.27~36 (2002)
  26. Stockwell, G., "International perspectives on motivation: Language learning and professional challenges", pp.156~175 (2013), Palgrave Macmillan
  27. Sun, C. -H., "The value of picture-book reading-based collaborative output activities for vocabulary retention", Language Teaching Research, 20(1), pp.1~22 (2016)
  28. Swain, M., "Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H. G. Widdiowson", pp.125~144 (1995), Oxford University Press
  29. Swain, M., "Handbook on research in second language teaching and learning", pp.471~483 (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  30. Swain, M., "Sociocultural theory and second language learning", pp.97~114 (2013), Oxford University Press
  31. Tapscott, D., "Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world" (2009), McGraw-Hill
  32. Unlu, Z, "Exploring classroom feedback interactions around EAP writing : A data based model", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 17, pp.24~36 (2015)
  33. Wang, S. -K., "An investigation of middle school science teachers and students use of technology inside and outside of classrooms : Considering whether digital natives are more technology savvy than their teachers", Education Tech Research Dev, 62, pp.637~662 (2014)
  34. Wong, W., "Input, input processing, and output : A study with discourse-level input and the French causative", IRAL, 53(2), pp.181~202 (2015)
  35. Xu, Q., "Investigating mobile-assisted oral feedback in teaching Chinese as a second language", Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3-4), pp.173~182 (2017)
  36. Yun, S., "Improving recall and transfer skills through vocabulary building in web-based second language learning : An examination by item and feedback type", Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), pp.158~172 (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)