일본어 ‘こと/の’ 절과 한국어 ‘것’ 절의 대조 연구
A Contrastive Study of Japanese ‘koto/no’ and Korean ‘kes’ Clauses,
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to contrast Japanese ‘koto/no’ and Korean ‘kes’ clauses in order to clarify their similarities and differences. ‘koto/no’ in Japanese ‘koto/no’ clause and ‘kes’ in Korean ‘kes’ clause, they serve as complementizers to form embedded noun clauses in Japanese and Korean. Since these are originally dependent nouns, we first analyze the features of the dependent nouns ‘koto/no’ and ‘kes’. Secondly, we contrast the ‘koto/no’ embedded noun clauses and the ‘kes’ embedded noun clauses, which are used as obligatory arguments for the verb of a matrix clause. In contrast, there are unusual ‘no’ and ‘kes’ clauses that seem to be embedded noun clause of the verb of a matrix clause in Japanese and Korean, therefore, we contrasted ‘no’ and ‘kes’ clauses. This study contrasts the similarities and differences between the Japanese ‘koto/no’ and the Korean ‘kes’ clauses, which are similar markers of grammatical functions in Korean and Japanese, namely, dependent nouns, which are originally grammaticalized and serve as complementizers to induce clauses. This study will be helpful both to teach Japanese as a foreign language and Korean as a foreign language.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to contrast Japanese ‘koto/no’ and Korean ‘kes’ clauses in order to clarify their similarities and differences. ‘koto/no’ in Japanese ‘koto/no’ clause and ‘kes’ in Korean ‘kes’ clause, they serve as complementizers to form embedded noun clauses in Japanese and Korean. Since these are originally dependent nouns, we first analyze the features of the dependent nouns ‘koto/no’ and ‘kes’. Secondly, we contrast the ‘koto/no’ embedded noun clauses and the ‘kes’ embedded noun clauses, which are used as obligatory arguments for the verb of a matrix clause. In contrast, there are unusual ‘no’ and ‘kes’ clauses that seem to be embedded noun clause of the verb of a matrix clause in Japanese and Korean, therefore, we contrasted ‘no’ and ‘kes’ clauses. This study contrasts the similarities and differences between the Japanese ‘koto/no’ and the Korean ‘kes’ clauses, which are similar markers of grammatical functions in Korean and Japanese, namely, dependent nouns, which are originally grammaticalized and serve as complementizers to induce clauses. This study will be helpful both to teach Japanese as a foreign language and Korean as a foreign language.
참고문헌 (35)
- 고영근, "우리말 문법론" (2008), 집문당
- 나오코, "한국어와 일본어의 명사절 대조 연구", 비교한국학 Comparative Korean Studies, 23(3), pp.419~451 (2015), 국제비교한국학회[DOI]
- 김용하, "한국어의 내핵 관계절에 대한 소고", 현대문법연구, (75), pp.83~99 (2013), 현대문법학회[DOI]
- 일․한 양언어의 복문에 관한 연구, "김은숙", 보고사, ~ (2003)
- 최진희, "명사화절 「こと・の」와 ‘것・기・음’", 일본어문학, (57), pp.121~144 (2012), 일본어문학회[DOI]
- 한진희, "한국어 ‘-것’의 통사범주와 범주 자질", 언어연구, 29(2), pp.345~361 (2013), 한국현대언어학회[DOI]
- Chan, C, "Differences between externally and internally headed relative clause constructions", The proceedings of the 9th International conference on HPSG, Stanford University, pp.43~65 (2003)
- 최영식, "Internally Headed Relative Clause in Korean: Structure and Interpretation", 언어학, 22(3), pp.43~64 (2014), 대한언어학회[DOI]
- Horie, K, "Core-oblique Distinction and Nominalizer Choice in Japanese and Korean", Studies in Language, 24(1), pp.77~102 (2000)
- Horie, K, "The grammaticalization of nominalizers in Japanese and Korean: A contrastive study, Rethinking Grammaticalization: New Perspectives", pp.169~187 (2007), John Benjamins
- Jhang, S.-E, "Headed Nominalizations in Korean", Doctoral, pp.1994
- Josephs, Lewis S, "Syntax and Semantics 5; Japanese Generative Grammar" (1976), Academic Press
- 김기동, "Complementizers of Nominalization in Japanese and Korean", 동서인문학, (6), pp.127~139 (1973), 인문과학연구소
- Kim, M.-J, "Event-structure and the internally-headed relative clause construction in Korean and Japanese", Doctoral, pp.2004
- Kim, N.-K, "Some Syntactic Properties of Noun Phrase Complementation in Korean and Japanese", 語學硏究, 1(15), pp.83~103 (1979), 서울대학교 어학연구소
- Kim, Y.-B, "Internally Headed Relative Clause Constructions in Korean, Language", Information and Computation, 11, pp.403~413 (1996)
- Kuroda, S.-Y, "Pivot-independent relative clause in Japanese, Ⅰ", Papers in Japanese Linguistics, 3, pp.59~93 (1974)
- Kuroda, S.-Y, "Japanese Syntax and Semantics" (1992), Kluwer Academic
- Park, B.-S, "Modification vs Complementation: The So-Called Internally Headed Relative Clauses Reconsidered", 국제 워크샵, 한국언어정보학회, pp.41~48 (1994)
- 박기성, "한국어와 일본어 그리고 영어의 보문소 의미론에 대한 비교 연구", 새한영어영문학, 45(2), pp.249~276 (2003), 새한영어영문학회
- Song, Z.-N, "The Abstract Nominalizers In Korean And Japanese", 언어, 2(6), pp.157~193 (1981), 한국언어학회
- 鎌田倫子, "日本語教師の課題｢ノとコトの使い分け｣の現在", 日本語学, 20(3), pp.26~35 (2001)
- 工藤真由美, "ノ、コトの使い分けと動詞の種類", 国文学 解釈と鑑賞, 50(3), pp.45~53 (1985)
- 橋本修, "補文標識｢の｣｢こと｣の分布に関わる意味規則", 国文学, 163, pp.1~12 (1990)
- 日本文法研究, "久野暲", 大修館書店, ~ (1973)
- 日本語連体修飾節構造の研究, "大島資生", ひつじ書房, ~ (2010)
- 三原健一, "日本語の統語構造" (1994), 松拍社
- 野田春美, "日本語類義表現の文法 (下)" (1995), くろしお出版
- 長谷川信子, "主要部内在型関係節：DP 分析", Scientific Approaches to Language, (.1), pp.1~33 (2002)
- 田中紀男, "主要部内在関係節再考", 外国語教育 理論と実践, 39, pp.1~11 (2013)
- 井上和子, "変形文法と日本語(上)" (1976), 大修館書店
- 坪本篤朗, "文の中に文を埋めるときコトとノはどこが違うのか", 国文学 解釈と教材の研究, 29(6), pp.87~92 (1984)
- 坪本篤朗, "文連結と認知図式-いわゆる主要部内在型関係節とその解釈", 日本語学, pp.79~91 (1995)
- 坪本篤朗, "いわゆる主要部内在型関係節の形式と意味と語用論, 国立国語研究所共同研究プロジェクト", 複文構文の意味の研究 発表論文 (2011)
- 黒田成幸, "ことばの格と周縁" (1999), くろしお出版