고급 한국어 L2 학습자의 구어 담화에 나타난 조응어 습득 연구-한국어 L1 화자와의 비교를 중심으로-
A study on the acquisition of anaphors in speaking of advanced Korean learners-Focused on the comparison with native Korean speakers-
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study investigated the anaphoric usage of advanced Korean learners through quantitative criteria based on discourse and pragmatic information. 10 L1 Korean speakers and 20 advanced L2 Korean learners (10 L1 English speakers, 10 L1 Chinese speakers) participated in a story retelling task. After transcribing the responses, anaphoric usage was analyzed according to discourse features, antecedent characteristics, and referent characteristics. Statistical differences were shown between groups in information status (topic shift), antecedent form (null pronoun and “i/gue + noun”), number of potential antecedents (one and two), syntactic roles of antecedent (non-subject), number of a referent (singular), and animacy of a referent (human and inanimate). Regarding the anaphoric usage rate, L1 Chinese speakers showed closer similarities to L1 Korean speakers than to L1 English speakers. Additionally, in terms of markedness, the hierarchies of “i/gue + noun” and “noun” did not exhibit consistent tendencies in the quantitative scale used in this study. However, the two forms were similar regarding the use of null pronouns and negative correlations.
Abstract
This study investigated the anaphoric usage of advanced Korean learners through quantitative criteria based on discourse and pragmatic information. 10 L1 Korean speakers and 20 advanced L2 Korean learners (10 L1 English speakers, 10 L1 Chinese speakers) participated in a story retelling task. After transcribing the responses, anaphoric usage was analyzed according to discourse features, antecedent characteristics, and referent characteristics. Statistical differences were shown between groups in information status (topic shift), antecedent form (null pronoun and “i/gue + noun”), number of potential antecedents (one and two), syntactic roles of antecedent (non-subject), number of a referent (singular), and animacy of a referent (human and inanimate). Regarding the anaphoric usage rate, L1 Chinese speakers showed closer similarities to L1 Korean speakers than to L1 English speakers. Additionally, in terms of markedness, the hierarchies of “i/gue + noun” and “noun” did not exhibit consistent tendencies in the quantitative scale used in this study. However, the two forms were similar regarding the use of null pronouns and negative correlations.
참고문헌 (31)
- 곽태원, "영어 지시표현 사용에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2020
- 金光熙, "국어 변항범주의 조응현상 연구", 박사, 국어국문, pp.1994
- 김상수, "한국어 학습자의 말하기 평가 담화에 나타난 결속 장치 사용 연구", 언어와 문화, 7(2), pp.33~53 (2011), 한국언어문화교육학회[DOI]
- 나은선, "한국어 학습자의 발표 담화에 나타난 담화 오류 양상 - 중국인과 베트남인 학습자를 대상으로", 문화와융합, 40(6), pp.239~276 (2018), 한국문화융합학회
- 민경모, "한국어 지시사 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2008
- 손희연, "한국어 학습자의 지시어 담화 기능 분석 -중국인 학습자의 인터뷰 사례를 중심으로-", 담화와 인지, 20(2), pp.127~150 (2013), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- 신지연, "국어 지시용언 연구" (1998), 태학사
- 신지연, "국어 대명사의 품사론", 한국어학, 38, pp.33~56 (2008), 한국어학회
- 양명희, "현대국어 대용어에 대한 연구" (1998), 태학사
- 양명희, "지시어 오류 분석과 중간언어 의미론 -영어권 학습자 말뭉치를 대상으로-", 한국어 의미학, 12, pp.229~254 (2003), 한국어의미학회
- 이성범, "추론의 화용론" (2001), 한국문화사
- 이유미, "한국어 L1 화자와 L2 학습자의 문장 내 조응어 해결 연구", 새국어교육, (122), pp.379~409 (2020), 한국국어교육학회[DOI]
- 장석진, "지시와 조응", 한글, (186), pp.115~149 (1984), 한글학회
- 정미진, "한국어 학습자를 위한 ‘이, 그’ 계열 응결 장치의 교육 연구", 국어교육, (167), pp.253~283 (2019), 한국어교육학회[DOI]
- 제효봉, "중국어권 한국어 학습자의 쓰기 텍스트에 나타난 모국어 영향 연구", 박사, pp.2015
- 하지혜, "학문 목적 한국어 고급 학습자의 발표 담화에 나타난 응결 장치 실현 양상 연구", 이중언어학, (72), pp.315~340 (2018), 이중언어학회[DOI]
- 황선영, "‘이’, ‘그’의 문맥적 지시 기능 사용 연구 -중국어권 한국어 학습자를 대상으로-", 겨레어문학, (62), pp.305~326 (2019), 겨레어문학회
- Blackwell, S. E., "Third-Person Subjects in Native Speakers'and L2 Learners' Narratives: Testing(and Revising) the Givenness Hierarchy for Spanish", Selected Proceedings of the 14th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, pp.142~164 (2012), Cascadilla Proceedings Project
- Bloomfield, L., "Language" (1933), Henry Holt
- Clements, M., "Reexamining the acquisition of null subject pronouns in a second language : Focus on referential and pragmatic constraints", Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 7(1), pp.33~62 (2017)
- Etikan, I., "Comparison of Snowball Sampling and Sequential Sampling Technique", Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 3(1), pp.6~7 (2016)
- Givón, T., "Language Universals and Second Language Acquisition", pp.109~136 (1984), John Benjamins
- Gudmestad, A., "What a Bayesian Analysis Can Do for SLA : New Tools for the Sociolinguistic Study of Subject Expression in L2 Spanish", Language Learning, 63(3), pp.371~399 (2013)
- Gundel, J. K., "Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse", Language, 69(2), pp.274~307 (1993)
- Halliday, M. A. K., "Cohesion in English" (1976), Longman
- Kweon, S., "Processing Null and Overt Pronoun Subject at Different Proficiency Levels in Korean as a Second Language", Foreign Languages Education, 19(1), pp.1~20 (2012)
- Lozano, C., "Spanish Learner Corpus Research: Current Trends and Future Perspectives", pp.235~265 (2016), John Benjamins
- Nagano, M. A., "Interpretation of Overt Pronouns in L1 and L2 Japanese: The Role of Context", Doctor, pp.2015
- Polio, C., "Acquiring nothing?: The Use of Zero Pronouns by Nonnative Speakers of Chinese and the Implications for the Acquisition of Nominal Reference", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(3), pp.353~377 (1995)
- Sorace, A., "Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian", Second Language Research, 22(3), pp.339~368 (2006)
- Zhao, L. X., "Ultimate attainment of anaphora resolution in L2 Chinese", Second Language Research, 30(3), pp.381~407 (2014)