일본의 다문화와 인본주의에 기초한 한국형 다문화정책 모형
A Study on Korean Multicultural Policy Model Based on Humanism
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
With increasing married immigrant women and migrant workers, Korean societyis rapidly moving towards becoming a multicultural society these days. However, The problem of Korean multicultural society, discrimination against themigrant workers, difficulties of adapting for Korea of married immigrant women,the dissolution of a married immigrants family, dropping out of school of migrantyouth, make the prospects for Korea's multicultural society are dim. The differential exclusionary model is not conform to the spirit of a multiculturalsociety and the Assimilation model does not help with social integration, theMulticulturalism, the system itself matches the intent of a multicultural society mostclosely, but the limitations of multiculturalism is far from a reality in Korea. To meet the needs of a multicultural society, Government departments of Koreaperform variety of policy is implemented without Uniform principles. then, Duplicateof the policy and efficiency decrease have occurred. The concentration of multiculturalpolicies to the central government has resulted in the limited participationof a local government or civil society. Japan in particular uses 'multicultural coexistance' as a key concept for developingboth discourse and policies on them. The multicultural policy of Japan presents meaningful points of comparison andlearning to the multicultural policy in Korea that has only recently begun to seekfor the aims and ways of multicultural policy from the perspective of social integration. In this paper, As an alternative, argues to the implementation of Korean typemulticultural policy based on the a humanism. Korean multicultural policy model based on humanism can overcome the limitationsof existing multicultural policy, can to be based on the reality of the Korea and alsocan be harmonized with the ideology of multiculturalism. First priority of Korean humanism is on the human dignity. and members of the Korea multicultural society can enjoys a unique cultural traditions, can be securedequal individuals of their status based on the ideals of multicultural.
Abstract
With increasing married immigrant women and migrant workers, Korean societyis rapidly moving towards becoming a multicultural society these days. However, The problem of Korean multicultural society, discrimination against themigrant workers, difficulties of adapting for Korea of married immigrant women,the dissolution of a married immigrants family, dropping out of school of migrantyouth, make the prospects for Korea's multicultural society are dim. The differential exclusionary model is not conform to the spirit of a multiculturalsociety and the Assimilation model does not help with social integration, theMulticulturalism, the system itself matches the intent of a multicultural society mostclosely, but the limitations of multiculturalism is far from a reality in Korea. To meet the needs of a multicultural society, Government departments of Koreaperform variety of policy is implemented without Uniform principles. then, Duplicateof the policy and efficiency decrease have occurred. The concentration of multiculturalpolicies to the central government has resulted in the limited participationof a local government or civil society. Japan in particular uses 'multicultural coexistance' as a key concept for developingboth discourse and policies on them. The multicultural policy of Japan presents meaningful points of comparison andlearning to the multicultural policy in Korea that has only recently begun to seekfor the aims and ways of multicultural policy from the perspective of social integration. In this paper, As an alternative, argues to the implementation of Korean typemulticultural policy based on the a humanism. Korean multicultural policy model based on humanism can overcome the limitationsof existing multicultural policy, can to be based on the reality of the Korea and alsocan be harmonized with the ideology of multiculturalism. First priority of Korean humanism is on the human dignity. and members of the Korea multicultural society can enjoys a unique cultural traditions, can be securedequal individuals of their status based on the ideals of multicultural.
참고문헌 (29)
- 강주현, "해외다문화사회통합연구; 덴마크 사례를 중심으로", 다문화사례연구, pp.108~131 (2008)
- 강창동, "단일민족사관의 사회사적 형성과 다문화교육의 방향 탐색", 교육사회학연구, 20(4), pp.1~25 (2010), 한국교육사회학회
- 김광린, "풍류도와 홍익인간사상, 풍류도(신선도), 단학 그리고 홍익인간", 홍익문화통일협회 제3회 정기학술회의 자료집, pp.35~36 (2001), 홍익문화통일협회
- 김명재, "헌법재판소 판례에서의 인간존엄에 관한 논증", pp.213~ (2010), 전남대학교 법학연구소
- 김선미, "홍익인간의 현대적 재해석", 선도문화, 10, pp.308~ (2010)
- 김영필, "한국적 다문화주의를 위한 철학적 변론", 철학논총, 59(1), pp.49~67 (2010), 새한철학회
- 김용옥, "도울눌함", 중앙일보, ~ (2009)
- 김철수, "헌법학신론", pp.309~ (2009), 박영사
- 김헌민, "다문화 사회의 정책적 이슈에 대한 고찰", pp.103~ (2008), 한국행정학회
- 김형성, "헌법의 이념적 기초로서의 홍익인본(弘益人本) 사상에 관한 연구", 성균관법학, 23(1), pp.1~24 (2011), 법학연구소
- 김혜숙, "여성주의 관점에서 본 다문화주의:열린 주체 형성의 문제", 철학연구, (76), pp.203~218 (2007), 철학연구회
- 박구용, "다원주의와 담론윤리학", 철학, (76), pp.209~232 (2003), 한국철학회
- 박금숙, "다문화 사회에서 단군신화의 의의", 석사, 다문화가정교육, pp.2011
- 양기호, "일본의 다문화 거버넌스와 한국에의 함의", 다문화사회연구, 2(1), pp.135~160 (2009), 다문화통합연구소[DOI]
- 오화영, "다문화사회의 사회통합 과제와 홍익인간 사상의 의미", 仙道文化, 9, pp.359~397 (2010), 국학연구원
- 유용식, "다문화 사회 대응정책 우선순위에 관한 연구", 사회복지정책, 36(2), pp.447~470 (2009), 한국사회복지정책학회
- 이가야, "프랑스의 다문화사회 : 동화에서 통합으로", 프랑스문화예술연구, 28, pp.255~287 (2009), 프랑스문화예술학회
- 이길용, "다문화주의의 이론과 실제", pp.76~ (2010), 도서출판 경진
- 일연, "삼국유사", pp.7~ (2005), 신원문화사
- 정미라, "여성주의와 다문화주의", 철학연구, 107, pp.51~68 (2008), 대한철학회
- 정연식, "홍익인간 이념의 전개와 그 정치적 함의", 정신문화연구, 22(1), pp.84~ (1999)
- 정영훈, "홍익인간 이념과 21세기 한국", 단군학연구, pp.195~ (2000)
- 주성훈, "다문화가족지원사업 문제점과 개선과제", 예산현안분석, (38), pp.75~ (2010), 국회예산정책처
- 지종화, "한국의 다문화 국가 현상과 새로운 정책모형", 지방정부연구, 13(2), pp.109~136 (2009), 한국지방정부학회
- 차옥숭, "국제혼인 이주여성 피해실태의 원인분석과 해결방안 모색", 담론201, 11(2), pp.139~169 (2008), 한국사회역사학회
- 한국학중앙연구원, "한국민족문화대백과사전 제18권", pp.471~472
- 한승준, "프랑스 동화주의 다문화정책의 위기와 재편에 관한 연구", 한국행정학보, 42(3), pp.463~486 (2008), 한국행정학회
- 장동진, "Multicultural Citizenship", pp.385~395 (2010), 동명사
- 佐久間孝正, "外國人の子どもの敎育問題 : 政府內懇談會における提言", pp.73~74 (2011), 勁草書房
