対応する韓国語の形態から見た日本語の条件表現を表す形態の表現意図-述べ立てモダリティを中心に-
Expression of intent form that represents the condition representation of Japanese as seen through the form of Korean corresponding : Around the NOBETATE modality
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper has focused on expressing intention so-called modality with thepurpose of clarifying by conducting through analysis with Korean (contrastiveanalysis) on forms and conditions of the characteristics of Japanese conditionalexpressions which have various forms, and the way of talking of a speaker. A conditional sentence can be divided into NOBETATE(statement) modality of[if an antecedent clause is valid, the following clause is realized] and executionmodality of [if an antecedent clause is valid, realize the following clause]. Japanese[baㆍtoㆍtara] is appeared in the sentence of NOBETATE(statement) modality andcorresponds to Korean forms [-myeon]ㆍ[-damyeon]. These forms have a differentspoken intention of antecedent and following clauses. [ba] is logical and inevitableand mainly represents an invariant condition. [tara], even for propositional contentdomain, is mostly appeared in one-off cause and effect sentence by specific andindividual characteristics. Since [to] is a form connoting time-based character, ithas a strong tendency to present nonhypothetical conditional expressions withrational and experiential and warning characters. In case of Korean forms such as[-myeon] and [-damyeon] in accord with Japanese forms, a supposition is anecessary form, thereby corresponding to [baㆍtoㆍtara] which representshypothetical conditional expression. [-myeon], on the other hand, is neutral to theinvariant condition of conjunction and is different from Japanese in terms of notinvolving in propositional content.
Abstract
This paper has focused on expressing intention so-called modality with thepurpose of clarifying by conducting through analysis with Korean (contrastiveanalysis) on forms and conditions of the characteristics of Japanese conditionalexpressions which have various forms, and the way of talking of a speaker. A conditional sentence can be divided into NOBETATE(statement) modality of[if an antecedent clause is valid, the following clause is realized] and executionmodality of [if an antecedent clause is valid, realize the following clause]. Japanese[baㆍtoㆍtara] is appeared in the sentence of NOBETATE(statement) modality andcorresponds to Korean forms [-myeon]ㆍ[-damyeon]. These forms have a differentspoken intention of antecedent and following clauses. [ba] is logical and inevitableand mainly represents an invariant condition. [tara], even for propositional contentdomain, is mostly appeared in one-off cause and effect sentence by specific andindividual characteristics. Since [to] is a form connoting time-based character, ithas a strong tendency to present nonhypothetical conditional expressions withrational and experiential and warning characters. In case of Korean forms such as[-myeon] and [-damyeon] in accord with Japanese forms, a supposition is anecessary form, thereby corresponding to [baㆍtoㆍtara] which representshypothetical conditional expression. [-myeon], on the other hand, is neutral to theinvariant condition of conjunction and is different from Japanese in terms of notinvolving in propositional content.
참고문헌 (10)
- 金慶恵, "条件表現形式に現われる「たら」に関する考察-対応する韓国語の形態から現われる意義特徴-", 日語日文学研究, 36, pp.48~ (2000), 韓国日語日文学会
- 金慶恵, "日本語と韓国語の条件表現の対照研究", 박사, 人文科学研究科, pp.2009
- 金子亨, "言語の時間表現 ひつじ研究叢書 言語編 第7巻", pp.322~ (1995), ひつじ書房
- 久野暲, "日本語研究" (1980), 大修館書店
- 豊田豊子, "ことわざ」からみた「と」「ば」「たら」「なら」の用法", 日本語教育, (56), pp.36~43 (1985), 日本語教育学会
- 仁田義雄, "現代日本語文のモダリティの体系と構造, In 日本語のモダリティ", pp.7~34 (1989), くろしお出版
- 蓮沼昭子, "「ナラ」と「トスレバ」", 日本語教育, 56, pp.65~ (1985), 日本語教育学会
- 益岡隆志, "日本語の条件について, In 日本語の条件表現", pp.8~10 (1993), くろしお出版
- 松下大三郎, "改選標準日本文法", pp.536~ (1975), 勉誠社
- 森山卓良, "モダリティ 日本語の文法3", pp.81~82 (2000), 岩波書店
