日本語の条件表現文の韓国語の翻訳実態 -表現形態の対応様相を通して-

Abstract

The Korean language that corresponds to [ba･to･tara･nara], which expresses the conditional expression of Japanese, in the form of conditional expression includes ‘-myeon, -sseumyeon, -rago hamyeon, -ndamyeon, -ramyeon, -ssdamyeon, -rago handamyeon, -keodeun, -sskodeun, -rago hageodeun, -ngeomyeon, -rago haneun geomyeon, -l keomyeon, -rago hal keomyeon, -l koyeotteoramyeon(sstteoramyeon), -ngeoramyeon, -rago haneun keoramyeon, -nga hamyeon’, while the forms of factual usage include ‘-ja, -nikka, -teoni, -ssdeoni, -taga’. Other forms found in the translation are ‘-ndago hamyeon, -ryeomyeon, -l keoramyeon, -l la chimyeon, -n pyeoni, -l tteneun, -eun/-neun, -l keoyeosseumyeon, -l paeya, -nge, -ni, -ppeun anira, -ko namyeon, -ko, -seo, -eo, -neunde, -ntyeune, -l tte, -shijageuro’. It is difficult to judge whether the use of ‘-ni, -ko namyeon, -ko, -seo, -eo, -neunde, -ntyunge, -l tte, -shijageuro’ in the Korean translation should be considered incorrect since they are not the corresponding meanings or expansion of meanings. The translations either show various forms or unexpected forms, including incorrect translations. In particular, ‘l tteneun’ for [repetitive conditions such as a habit]; ‘-ni’ for [introductory usages]; ‘-eun/-neun’,]‘-ryeomyeon’, ‘-l tteneun’, ‘-; baeya’, and ‘-lla chimyeon’ for [assumptions]; ‘-l baeya’, ‘-n pyeoni’, and ‘-n ke’ for [conditions that are opposite to facts]; ‘-ko namyeon’ and ‘-shijaguro’ for [expressions of action, work, and reaction in the subsequent phrase as a result of the prior phrase]; ‘-ko namyeon’, ‘-ko’, ‘-seo’, and ‘-eo’ for [continuous phrases]; and ‘-neunde’ and, ‘-n tyunge’ for [concurrent phrases] do not correspond to the usage of meaning in Japanese, but to the contents of phrases as liberal translation. The issue of difference in the nuance of meaning of ‘-eun/-neun’ corresponding to [wa] still remains when the Korean forms corresponding to [nara] for 7) suggestion of topic.