본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

非情物主語の他動詞文について-文の意味構造および表現事態を中心に-

Study about transitive sentence of inanimate subject

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

.

Abstract

This paper examines what kind of events transitive sentence of inanimate subject expresses in terms of transitivity . I collected 500 sentences of transitive sentence of inanimate subject from novels and practical books and used it for analysis. As a type of semantic structure, 「affection + change type(25%of the totall)」, 「affection type(59.6%)」, 「non-affection type(15.4%)」 are observed. 「affection type」 showed the highest frequency. Following I summarize the characteristics of each type. First 「affection + change」 type is the type that causes a change of complement. In the 「affection + change」 type(125 cases) there are 81cases which changes of animate noun complement and 44 cases changes of inanimate noun complement. Psychological change of animate noun and physical change of inanimate noun appears frequently. Subject types of physiological change are limited as ① natural phenomena, ② concrete object (food), ③ sense. On the other hand subject types of psychological changes extremely diverse. Specifically ① inner feelings and thoughts of human, ② what human says, ③ some facts and incidents, circumstances, ④ TV, media, music, media, ⑤ variety of other things. Second 「affection type」is the type which affect to the complement but does not change of the complement. 「affection type」shows the highest frequency (59.6% of all). In the 298 cases of 「affection type」there are 249 cases affect to animate noun complement and 49 cases affect to inanimate noun. The 「affection + change」type and 「affection」type show similar tendency of subject types corresponding to the predicate situation. Third, 「non-affection type」is the type which does not affect to complement. 77 cases observed (15.4% of the total). As a sub-type of the 「non-affection type」there are types as like (1)the type represents human’s acts, (2)the type which express number measured specific instruments or refers to deep meaning of certain facts. (3)the type represents the nature or characteristics.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 青木博史, "筑紫語学論叢Ⅱ─日本語史と方言─", pp.274~293 (2006)
  2. 奥田靖雄, "日本語文法・連語論(資料編)", pp.21~279 (1983)
  3. 国広哲弥, "日英対照表現構造論(1)─無生物主語表現─", 島根大学論集(人文科学), (14), pp.8~251 (1965), 島根大学
  4. 金田一春彦, "日本語の特質" (1981), 日本放送出版協会
  5. 小池清治, "日本語表現・文型辞典", pp.163~166 (2002), 朝倉書店
  6. 早津恵美子, "有対他動詞と無対他動詞の違いについて", 言語研究, 95, pp.231~255 (1989), 日本言語学会
  7. 森岡健二, "国語論究6 近代語の研究", pp.1~36 (1997), 明治書院
  8. 光信仁美, "非情物主語の他動詞文について", 日本語学科年報, (17), pp.1~19 (1995), 東京外国語大学外国語学部 日本語学科研究室
  9. ウェスリー・M・ヤコブセン, "日本語学の新展開", pp.213~248 (1989)
  10. 熊鶯, "鍵がドアをあけた" (2009), 笠間書院
  11. 權勝林, "他動詞と使役性", 일본학보, 42, pp.1~17 (1999), 한국일본학회
  12. 최서영, "非情物主語の他動詞文が表す意味類型", 일본언어문화, 18(18), pp.255~274 (2011), 한국일본언어문화학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)