디아스포라 서사와 강요된 모빌리티의 재현 -이회성의 『유역』을 중심으로-
Diasporic Narrative and Representation of “Enforced Mobility” -Focused on Watershed by Hoe-sung Lee-
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aimed to analyze Watershed written by Hoe-song Lee based on the concept of mobility suggested by John Urry, and to discuss how ‘mobility’ was reproduced focusing on the narration of ‘deportation’ of Koreans. The motive of the work was the story of two Zainichi Korean novelists who were invited by an alliance of writers in Kazakstan to visit the Soviet Union for about one month. ‘The Deportation of 1937’ is the main story they tried to cover, but there are two underlying narrative structures. One is the process of covering for ‘Chang-ho Gang-reportage writer-the Deportation of 1937-history restoration’ and the other is the narration of the mobility of ‘an individual,’ ‘Zainichi Koreans’ and furthermore the ‘diaspora’ unfolded, focusing on the memory of the main character, Chun-su, that was recalled in the process of covering the story. The ‘deportation’ of the diaspora demonstrates how ‘mobility’ composes political violence through the power and control system of the state back then that forced and blocked mobility. In addition, the narration of mobility of the diaspora as an individual and Zainichi Koreans that is described through the memory of Chun-su depicts the process of the creation of ‘attachment to a place,’ that is, the desire to go back to ‘Sakhalin’ and their homeland both psychologically and physically.
Abstract
This study aimed to analyze Watershed written by Hoe-song Lee based on the concept of mobility suggested by John Urry, and to discuss how ‘mobility’ was reproduced focusing on the narration of ‘deportation’ of Koreans. The motive of the work was the story of two Zainichi Korean novelists who were invited by an alliance of writers in Kazakstan to visit the Soviet Union for about one month. ‘The Deportation of 1937’ is the main story they tried to cover, but there are two underlying narrative structures. One is the process of covering for ‘Chang-ho Gang-reportage writer-the Deportation of 1937-history restoration’ and the other is the narration of the mobility of ‘an individual,’ ‘Zainichi Koreans’ and furthermore the ‘diaspora’ unfolded, focusing on the memory of the main character, Chun-su, that was recalled in the process of covering the story. The ‘deportation’ of the diaspora demonstrates how ‘mobility’ composes political violence through the power and control system of the state back then that forced and blocked mobility. In addition, the narration of mobility of the diaspora as an individual and Zainichi Koreans that is described through the memory of Chun-su depicts the process of the creation of ‘attachment to a place,’ that is, the desire to go back to ‘Sakhalin’ and their homeland both psychologically and physically.
참고문헌 (14)
- 김주영, "이회성의 유역으로 연구 - 죄의식 서술을 통한 이동 서사의 방법화 -", 일어일문학연구, 102(2), pp.97~113 (2017), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
- 박종율, "아르헨티나 역사 재현을 위한 서술적 전략 - 페르난도 로뻬스의 가장훌륭한적 을중심으로 -", 스페인어문학, (22) (2002), 한국스페인어문학회
- 이상봉, "모빌리티의 공간정치학: 장소의 재인식과 사회관계의 재구성", 대한정치학회보, 25(1), pp.113~138 (2017), 대한정치학회[DOI]
- 이용균, "모빌리티의 구성과 실천에 대한 지리학적 탐색", 한국도시지리학회지, 18(3), pp.147~159 (2015), 한국도시지리학회
- 이-푸 투안, "공간과 장소", pp.254~ (2011), 대윤
- 이회성, "유역", pp.7~483 (1992), 한길사
- 강현수, "모빌리티 (Mobilities)", pp.33~ (2014), 아카넷
- "러시아, 중앙아시아 한인의 역사(상)", pp.192~ (2008), 국사편찬위원회
- 케빈 케니, "디아스포라 이즈", pp.69~ (2016), 앨피
- 최일만, "모빌리티 이론", pp.218~ (2019), 앨피
- 金賛汀, "シルクロードの朝鮮人(上)", 民濤, (9), pp.9~ (1989)
- 李恢成, "時代と人間の運命", pp.254~ (1996), 同時代社
