지역재생사업으로서 어촌뉴딜300사업 계획과 절차적 과제 – 포항시 장기면 신창2리항 어촌뉴딜사업을 중심으로 -

Abstract

Until now, Korea's fishing village development program has had a significant impact on increasing fishing income as it has been promoted as a tourism-driven scheme. However, the government did not respond to the decrease in population, ageing population, ageing residential environment, and lack of safety facilities in fishing ports. As a result, the Korean government is pushing for the New Deal 300 project(FVND) as a regional regeneration project from 2019 to 2022. Therefore, this study aims to derive procedural challenges with an initial diagnosis for the faithful implementation of FVND as a regional regeneration project. As a point of law, the procedures for the FVND project are based on the collection of opinions, operation and support of the Fishing Village and Fishery Harbors Regeneration Regional Consultation Body(RCB) based on the 「Special Act on the Promotion and Support of Urban Regeneration」 and the 「Fishing Village and Fishery Harbors Act」. Accordingly, the FVND opened up to the general public to form a RCB and discover projects, and the Masterplan step works in conjunction to derive projects led by the RCB, and the Identification step has been laid out to enhance the capabilities of local organizations for project operation. During the public offering, a Project Promotion Committee consisting of local governments and local residents prepared a preliminary plan after receiving expert advice from the Korea Rural Community Corporation. The preliminary plan, which was evaluated by the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries on-site advice, was transferred to the Masterplan step. The Regional Consultation Body has established new common goals and discovered projects, selected a total of 14 detailed projects for common projects for fishing port maintenance, chosen specialized projects considering local conditions, and has initiated software projects for establishing operation management programs. The step of strengthening assets was to equip the local community with self-sustaining power, focusing on consulting and education. However, after comparing and analyzing Rural Center Revitalization Project with a similar precedent, the RCB was firstly operated in the form of an advisory council and had low intimacy among its members. Second, as the project itself focuses on short-term residents' capabilities improvement, it is impossible to continuously exchange and coordinate administrative and professional fields after the construction completion. Third, it was impossible to predict the effectiveness of the project in the future as the execution period of the project budget was set for three years. Therefore, in order for the sustainable FVND to be carried out, challenges such as expanding the role of experts in charge of the project, the need for an Intermediary Organization to support the project in close contact with the site for a long time, and raising separate funds by local governments after the completion of the project remain at large.