Complement Distribution and Complement Factivity of “NO”
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The following are revealed regarding the correspondence relationship, which primarily exists between the presence of factivity in O case complements and the complementizers NO and KOTO in modern Japanese. a. The presence or absence of factivity in O case complements and the selection of NO or KOTO complementizers is not a one-to-one relationship; however, under certain conditions, a correlation exists between the allowance of the NO complement and complement factivity. b. The correlation is as follows: generally, higher tolerance of NO in a tensed complement allowing KOTO results in a stronger factive interpretation of the complement. Based on the behavior related to the above, it is therefore appropriate to separate the predicates into four types as follows. Type A :represented by “kateisuru(suppose)” Type B: represented by “noberu(state,claim)” Type C :represented by “tsutaeru(tell,report)” Type D: represented by “zannengaru(regret)” Type D, Type C, Type B and Type A bring the higher factive interpretation to complement proposition in that order, in parallel, NO in type D, Type C, Type B and Type A Indicates a higher acceptability in that order.
Abstract
The following are revealed regarding the correspondence relationship, which primarily exists between the presence of factivity in O case complements and the complementizers NO and KOTO in modern Japanese. a. The presence or absence of factivity in O case complements and the selection of NO or KOTO complementizers is not a one-to-one relationship; however, under certain conditions, a correlation exists between the allowance of the NO complement and complement factivity. b. The correlation is as follows: generally, higher tolerance of NO in a tensed complement allowing KOTO results in a stronger factive interpretation of the complement. Based on the behavior related to the above, it is therefore appropriate to separate the predicates into four types as follows. Type A :represented by “kateisuru(suppose)” Type B: represented by “noberu(state,claim)” Type C :represented by “tsutaeru(tell,report)” Type D: represented by “zannengaru(regret)” Type D, Type C, Type B and Type A bring the higher factive interpretation to complement proposition in that order, in parallel, NO in type D, Type C, Type B and Type A Indicates a higher acceptability in that order.
참고문헌 (13)
- Bekki, D, "Presumptions and Speaker Knowledge State in Japanese Factive Introductory Expression Dependent Clauses", 13th Annual Academic Convention for the Association of Natural Language Processing (NLP2007) Anthology of Presentations, pp.322~325 (2007)
- Hashimoto, O, "The Distribution of ‘koto", no’Complements (1): with Special Reference to ‘tsutaeru’ and ‘noberu’, 1998, pp.3, 1~8[DOI]
- Hashimoto, O, "Some Problems of Unified Analysis of Complementizer ‘no’", The Interface of Meaning and Form: Sexagenarian Memorial of Professor Nakau Minoru Presentation Anthology, pp.487~497 (2001), Kuroshio Publishers
- Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, "Jackendoff, Ray S", The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, ~ (1972)
- Kamata, T, "Selection of NO or KOTO as the head of a complement clause", Scientific Approaches to Language, 3, pp.113~128 (2004), Kanda University of International Studies
- Kamio, A, "Factivity: 25 years later", CLS, 32, pp.153~163 (1996)
- Karttunen, Lauri, "On the Semantics Complement Sentences", CLS, 6, pp.328~339 (1970)
- Kiparsky, Paul, "Fact", pp.345~369 (1971)
- Kuno, S, "Studies in Japanese Grammar" (1973), Taishukan Publishing Co. Ltd
- Oshima, M, "On NO and KOTO which Appear in Complementation", Bulletin of International Center, the University of Tokyo, 47~69 (1996)
- Sunagawa, Y, "The Structure and Function of Quotations (Volume 2): On Quotational Phrases and Noun Phrases", Studies in Language and Literature:Language, 14, pp.75~91 (1988), University of Tsukuba Department of Literature and Linguistics
- Teramura, H, "Syntax and Meaning of Japanese Adnominal Modification 1-4", Journal of Japanese Language and Literature, 4-7 (1978), Osaka University of Foreign Studies
- Wang Luming, "Toward a Functional Typology of Noun Modifying Constructions in Japanese and Chinese: A Corpus-Based Account", Studies in Language Sciences, 8, pp.213~228 (2009), Kuroshio Publishers