明治期と現代における「ったら」の比較
Comparison of “ttara” between the Meiji period and the present day
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper compares the usage examples of the topic article and the sentence-final particle "ttara" between the Meiji period and the present day. In addition, it clarifies the following points about the five usage methods: <evaluation, expression, repeated invocation, re-presentation, and extremeness>. First, the standard expression “Ａ ttara Ａ” was followed by <re-presentation> and “Ａ ttara-nai” was followed by <extremeness>. Both of them went through a period of combined use of “ttara/toittaraa” then it became a single usage of “ttara”. Next, for <evaluation>, there was no period it was used in combination with “といったら” (toittara), and it is considered that “ttara” was used from the start. Finally, in the Meiji period (1868-1912), <re-presentation> was the most common usage with about half of all the cases, while <evaluation> now accounts for about 80% of the usages. In addition, it was pointed out that the five usages shared the common feature of having situation-specific applicability on site.
Abstract
This paper compares the usage examples of the topic article and the sentence-final particle "ttara" between the Meiji period and the present day. In addition, it clarifies the following points about the five usage methods: <evaluation, expression, repeated invocation, re-presentation, and extremeness>. First, the standard expression “Ａ ttara Ａ” was followed by <re-presentation> and “Ａ ttara-nai” was followed by <extremeness>. Both of them went through a period of combined use of “ttara/toittaraa” then it became a single usage of “ttara”. Next, for <evaluation>, there was no period it was used in combination with “といったら” (toittara), and it is considered that “ttara” was used from the start. Finally, in the Meiji period (1868-1912), <re-presentation> was the most common usage with about half of all the cases, while <evaluation> now accounts for about 80% of the usages. In addition, it was pointed out that the five usages shared the common feature of having situation-specific applicability on site.
참고문헌 (13)
- 岩男考哲, "『と言う』の条件形を用いた文の広がり", 日本語文法, 12(2), pp.179~195 (2012)
- 三枝玲子, "提題の『ってば』『ったら』", 一橋大学留学生センター紀要, 2, pp.1~11 (1999)
- 砂川有里子, "日本語辞書学の構築", pp.86~104 (2006), おうふう
- 砂川有里子, "複合辞研究の現在研究叢書357", pp.23~40 (2006), 和泉書店
- 日本語記述文法研究会, "現代日本語文法5", pp.197~182 (2009), くろしお出版
- 요시다 레이코, "「ったら」に関する考察", 일본언어문화, (52), pp.79~98 (2020), 한국일본언어문화학회
- 神保五彌, "浮世風呂 新日本古典文学大系86", pp.40~ (2009), 岩波書店
- 赤川次郎, "ふたり", pp.61~ (1992), 新潮社
- 内田康夫, "歌わない笛", pp.113~ (1998), 徳間書店
- 角田光代, "対岸の彼女", pp.108~ (2007), 文春文庫
- 島田一男, "熱海初島殺人事件", pp.19~ (1994), 徳間書店
- "現代日本語書き言葉均衡コーパス(BCCW－NT)"[URL]
- "青空文庫"[URL]