본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

동태적 혁신경쟁과 경쟁법 집행에 관한 고찰

A study on the dynamic innovation competition and the enforcement of competition law

권영관
한국규제학회|2018.06|규제연구 (Journal of Regulation Studies)|제27권 제1호|pp. 93-122|DOI 10.22954/ksrs.2018.27.1.004

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

혁신경쟁법Innovation접근법동태적 경쟁Dynamic CompetitionCompetition Law혁신경쟁Innovation CompetitionApproach.
주제분류행정학

초록

경제성장의 가장 중요한 원동력 중 하나가 혁신이므로 동태적 혁신경쟁을 촉진시키는 것은 경제의 지속적인 성장을 위해 중요한 정책적 과제이다. 따라서 혁신을 창출하는 혁신기업들에 대한 보상을 강화하고 우월적인 혁신이 시장에서 선택되고 발전할 수 있도록 정부의 적절한 역할이 일차적으로 중요하다. 경쟁당국의 경쟁법 집행시 동태적 혁신경쟁이 중요한 이슈로 부각되고 있지만, 기존의 정태적 관점에 기반한 경쟁법 집행의 도구들은 동태적인 혁신경쟁을 고려하는데 커다란 한계점을 가지고 있다. 그럼에도 불구하고 국내에서는 아직까지 경쟁법 집행시 구체적으로 동태적 혁신경쟁을 어떻게 고려해야 하는지에 대해 아직까지 논의가 거의 이루어지지 않고 있는 상황이다. 이러한 인식하에 본 논문에서는 동태적 혁신경쟁의 본질에 대해 고찰함과 동시에 동태적 혁신경쟁을 고려하기 위한 경쟁법 집행 접근법들과 해외 경쟁당국의 경쟁법 집행 사례를 구체적으로 고찰하였다. 경쟁법 집행 시 동태적 혁신경쟁에 대한 효과적인 고려를 위해서는 대안적인 접근법들의 우열에 집착하기보다 개별 사건의 본질과 특성, 혁신경쟁의 특성을 충분히 고려할 수 있도록 가능하다면 세 가지 접근법들을 통해 종합적으로 평가하는 접근이 바람직할 것이다. 나아가 동태적 혁신경쟁에 관한 혁신효과와 경쟁제한성 등에 대한 평가를 함에 있어 잠재적 진입자의 진입가능성 뿐만 아니라 기존기업 또는 잠재적 경쟁자들의 혁신인센티브, 혁신의 발전경로 등에 대한 영향을 중점적으로 고려하는 것이 바람직할 것이다.

Abstract

Innovation is one of most critical drivers of economic growth and thus enhancing dynamic innovation competition is an important policy challenge for sustainable economic growth. To do so, first and foremost, governments must play a proper role in both strengthening rewards for firms creating innovations and being superior innovations selected by markets. The dynamic innovation competition is upcoming issue to enforce competition law by competition authority, but the approaches or tools developed to enforce competition law based on static view of competition have critical limitations in considering the dynamic innovation competition. Under this situation, there is lack of domestic researches and specific discussions on how to analyze the dynamic innovation competition in competition law enforcement. From this perception, the paper specifically reviews the nature of innovation and dynamic innovation competition. In addition, it investigates both some doctrines or approaches used in enforcing competition law in order to consider dynamic innovation competition and some related cases handled by foreign competition authorities. In order to analyze the dynamic innovation competition, it is desirable to sufficiently considering the nature and characteristics of the innovation competition in question case and to comprehensively evaluate the innovation and/or anti-competitive effects by employing all of alternative doctrines or approaches if possible instead of sticking to superiority of them. Furthermore, competition authority needs to analyze the innovation incentives of incumbents and/or potential competitors and the evolutionary path of innovations as well as the possibility of entry of competitors.

참고문헌 (60)

  1. 공정거래위원회, "기업결합심사기준", ~ (2015)
  2. 권남훈, "동태적 혁신산업과 경쟁법의 집행", 경쟁저널, (162), pp.46~55 (2012)
  3. "대법원 2008. 5. 29, 2006두6659", ~ (2008)
  4. "대법원 2009. 9. 10, 2008두9744", ~ (2009)
  5. "김상조 “경쟁법 집행에 경쟁도입...민․형사 수단 활용”", 연합뉴스, ~ (2017)
  6. Aghion, P., "Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2), pp.701~728 (2005)
  7. Aghion, P., "Competition, imitation and growth with step-by-step innovation", The Review of Economic Studies, 68(3), pp.467~492 (2001)
  8. Industry location patterns and the importance of history, "Arthur, W. B.", Center for Economic Policy Research, Stanford University, ~ (1986)
  9. Arthur, W. B., "Positive feedbacks in the economy", Scientific American, 262(2), pp.92~99 (1990)
  10. Arthur, W. B., "Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy" (1994), University of Michigan Press
  11. Boone, J., "Competitive pressure: the effects on investments in product and process innovation", The RAND Journal of Economics, pp.549~569 (2000)
  12. Boone, J., "Intensity of competition and the incentive to innovate", International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19(5), pp.705~726 (2001)
  13. Breschi, S., "Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation", The economic journal, 110(463), pp.388~410 (2000)
  14. Carlton, D. W., "Intellectual property, antitrust, and strategic behavior", Innovation policy and the economy, 3, pp.29~59 (2003)
  15. Clark J. B., "The Real Dangers of the Trusts", The Century Magazine, 68, pp.954~959 (1904)
  16. Dasgupta, P., "Industrial structure and the nature of innovative activity", The Economic Journal, 90(358), pp.266~293 (1980)
  17. d'Aspremont, C., "Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers", The American Economic Review, 78(5), pp.1133~1137 (1988)
  18. Dosi, G., "Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change", Research policy, 11(3), pp.147~162 (1982)
  19. Dosi, G., "Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation", Journal of economic literature, pp.1120~1171 (1988)
  20. Dosi, G., "Technology and enterprise in a historical perspective" (1992), Clarendon Press
  21. European Commission, "Case No COMP", M.6281 – Microsoft, pp.2011, ~
  22. European Commission, "Commission Regulation No. 1217", 2010 of 14 December 2010 on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union to Categories of Research and Development Agreements (R&D BER), 2010
  23. European Commission, "Commission Regulation No. 316", 2014 of 21 March 2014 on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to Categories of Technology Transfer Agreements (TTBER), 2014
  24. European Commission, "Council Regulation (EC) No 139", 2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (EC Merger Regulation), 2004
  25. European Commission, "Guidelines on the applicability of Article 81 of the EC Treaty to Horizontal Cooperation Agreements", ~ (2001)
  26. Fudenberg, D., "Preemption, leapfrogging and competition in patent races", European Economic Review, 22(1), pp.3~31 (1983)
  27. Futia, C. A., "Schumpeterian competition", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94(4), pp.675~695 (1980)
  28. Gilbert, R. J., "Incorporating dynamic efficiency concerns in merger analysis: The use of innovation markets", Antitrust Law Journal, 63(2), pp.569~601 (1994)
  29. "Hoechst AG, 120 F.T.C. 1010", ~ (1995)
  30. Hoerner, R. J., "Innovation markets: new wine in old bottles?", Antitrust Law Journal, 64(1), pp.49~73 (1995)
  31. Jorde, T. M., "Antitrust, Innovation, and Competitiveness" (1992), Oxford University Press
  32. Kamien, M. I., "On the degree of rivalry for maximum innovative activity", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90(2), pp.245~260 (1976)
  33. Landman, L. B., "Economics of Future Goods Markets", The World Competition, 21 (1997)
  34. Lee, T., "Market structure and innovation: a reformulation", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94(2), pp.429~436 (1980)
  35. Loury, G. C., "Market structure and innovation", The quarterly journal of economics, pp.395~410 (1979)
  36. Malerba, F., "Schumpeterian patterns of innovation", Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), pp.47~65 (1995)
  37. Morse, M. H., "The limits of innovation markets", ABA Antitrust and Intellectual Property Newsletter, ~ (2001)
  38. Mozelle W. Thompson, "Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Mozelle W. Thompson Genzyme Corporation’s Acquisition of Novazyme Pharmaceuticals Inc.", File No. 021-0026, ~ (2004)
  39. Nelson, R. R., "Why do firms differ, and how does it matter?", Strategic management journal, 12(S2), pp.61~74 (1991)
  40. Nelson, R. R., "An evolutionary theory of economic change" (1982), Harvard Business School Press
  41. Nelson, R. R., "Neoclassical vs. evolutionary theories of economic growth: critique and prospectus", The Economic Journal, 84(336), pp.886~905 (1974)
  42. Nelson, R. R., "Technical change in an evolutionary model", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, pp.90~118 (1976)
  43. Rapp, R. T., "The misapplication of the innovation market approach to merger analysis", Antitrust Law Journal, 64(1), pp.19~47 (1995)
  44. Reinganum, J. F., "Uncertain innovation and the persistence of monopoly", The American Economic Review, 73(4), pp.741~748 (1983)
  45. Rockoff, H., "Engaging the past: the uses of history across the social sciences" (1994), Duke University Press
  46. Scherer, F. M., "Economic Performance" (1990), Houghton-Mifflin
  47. Schumpeter, J. A., "Capitalism, socialism and democracy" (1942), Harper and Brothers
  48. Schumpeter, J. A., "Business cycles" (1939), McGraw-Hill
  49. Sensormatic Elec. Corp., "FTC File No.941-0126, 60 Fed. Reg. 5428", ~ (1995)
  50. Sidak, J. G., "Dynamic competition in antitrust law", Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 5(4), pp.581~631 (2009)
  51. Simon, H. A., "A behavioral model of rational choice", The quarterly journal of economics, 69(1), pp.99~118 (1955)
  52. Teece, D. J., "The meaning of monopoly: antitrust analysis in high-technology industries", Antitrust Bulletin, 43, pp.801~ (1998)
  53. "United States v. Lockheed Martin Corp., Civ. No. 98-00731", ~ (1998)
  54. U.S. Department of Justice, "Horizontal Merger Guidelines", ~ (2010)
  55. U.S. Department of Justice, "Merger Guidelines", ~ (1982)
  56. U.S. Department of Justice, "Horizontal Merger Guidelines", ~ (1984)
  57. U.S. Department of Justice, "Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property", ~ (1995)
  58. Anticipating the 21st Century: Competition Policy in the New High-Tech, Global Marketplace, "U.S. Federal Trade Commission", ~ (1996)
  59. "United States v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 410 U.S. 526", ~ (1973)
  60. Yao, D. A., "Innovation issues under the 1992 Merger Guidelines", Antitrust Law Journal, 61(2), pp.505~521 (1993)

관련 논문AI추천

동태적 시장에서의 기업결합규제이효석법학연구원 · 법학논고2023 · 제81호경쟁법집행에서 규제정책의 실태와 쟁점분석김용철한국정책개발학회 · 정책개발연구2023 · 제23권 제2호디지털 플랫폼과 동태적 경쟁에 관한 연구 -배달앱의 수평적 기업결합 사건을 중심으로-박경미법제처 · 법제2021 · 제692권 공정거래법에 의한 지적재산권 남용 규제: 비판과 대안의 제시손호진중앙법학회 · 중앙법학2011 · 제13권 제1호배제남용행위의 혁신저해 효과 평가방법 연구 - 퀄컴 사건에 대한 한국과 미국 판결을 중심으로 -신봉삼한국경쟁법학회 · 경쟁법연구2025 · 제51권 경쟁법 집행에서 경제이론 및 경제분석의 역할이상규법학연구소 · 경제규제와 법2023 · 제16권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

기술규제의 내재적 특성과 정책과정 현상 분석천지은, 이용규pp. 3-28디지털 헬스케어 규제 개선방안에 관한 연구심우현, 박정원pp. 29-61기술규제와 중소기업 성과의 관계 탐색: 기술혁신의 매개효과를 중심으로김권식, 이광훈, 안승구pp. 63-91대형소매점 영업제한의 경제적 효과: 쟁점 및 평가정진욱pp. 123-151모범거래기준과 영업지역침해: 한국 커피 프랜차이즈 산업을 중심으로유민희, 김지영, 최윤정pp. 153-188
원문 보기