저소득가구를 위한 주택임대료지원정책에 관한 연구* -한국의 주거급여제도와 일본의 주택부조제도의 비교분석-
A Study of Housing Rent Support Policies for Low-Income Households -A comparative analysis of the Korean housing benefit system and the Japanese housing assistance system-
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study conducted a comparative analysis of the rent-support policies for low-income households in Korea and Japan. The study focused on the housing benefit system in Korea and the housing assistance system in Japan to carry out a comparative analysis. Both systems are the major rent-support systems for low-income households in Korea and Japan and have the characteristics of a public assistance system. Since 2008, Korea's residential rent market has experienced skyrocketing prices for both housing lease on a deposit basis as well as monthly rents, thereby imposing a heavy burden on low-income households in terms of housing expenses. Thus, rent-support policies have become a quintessential policy challenge in terms of ensuring basic residential supports for them. Against this backdrop, as Korea's National Basic Livelihood Security Act is set to be revised in 2014, the housing benefit system that has been offered based on this Act is subject to significant revision. The key changes include the expansion of the eligible household for the benefits and the modification of application criteria, among others. Thanks to the revision, a household that did not fall into the category of the basic households for national basic livelihood security in accordance with the National Basic Livelihood Security Act will be able to receive housing benefits. This means that the housing benefit system goes beyond the boundary of the national basic livelihood security system and is expanded further. While this expands the eligible recipients of the system, it also has a possibility of reducing the effectiveness of the support by sharing limited budgets among too many recipients. As for Japan, its housing assistance system, which is implemented as a part of the national basic livelihood security system, limits the target to the lowest income households. Instead, the Japanese government fully reflects market rents to ensure feasible and effective rent support making up for this limitation. The study presents an ideal direction for Korea's housing benefit policy through the comparative analysis between both countries’systems and policies.
Abstract
This study conducted a comparative analysis of the rent-support policies for low-income households in Korea and Japan. The study focused on the housing benefit system in Korea and the housing assistance system in Japan to carry out a comparative analysis. Both systems are the major rent-support systems for low-income households in Korea and Japan and have the characteristics of a public assistance system. Since 2008, Korea's residential rent market has experienced skyrocketing prices for both housing lease on a deposit basis as well as monthly rents, thereby imposing a heavy burden on low-income households in terms of housing expenses. Thus, rent-support policies have become a quintessential policy challenge in terms of ensuring basic residential supports for them. Against this backdrop, as Korea's National Basic Livelihood Security Act is set to be revised in 2014, the housing benefit system that has been offered based on this Act is subject to significant revision. The key changes include the expansion of the eligible household for the benefits and the modification of application criteria, among others. Thanks to the revision, a household that did not fall into the category of the basic households for national basic livelihood security in accordance with the National Basic Livelihood Security Act will be able to receive housing benefits. This means that the housing benefit system goes beyond the boundary of the national basic livelihood security system and is expanded further. While this expands the eligible recipients of the system, it also has a possibility of reducing the effectiveness of the support by sharing limited budgets among too many recipients. As for Japan, its housing assistance system, which is implemented as a part of the national basic livelihood security system, limits the target to the lowest income households. Instead, the Japanese government fully reflects market rents to ensure feasible and effective rent support making up for this limitation. The study presents an ideal direction for Korea's housing benefit policy through the comparative analysis between both countries’systems and policies.
참고문헌 (23)
- 강신욱, "기초보장으로서 주거지원의 재설계", 보건복지포럼, 197 (2013), 한국보건사회연구원
- 김영태, "임대료보조제도의 도입 가능성에 대한 고찰:프랑스의 사례를 중심으로", 국토, 265, pp.84~ (2003), 국토연구원
- 김혜승, "주거급여제도의 현황 및 개선방안", 국토, 270 (2004), 국토연구원
- 국토교통부, "2012년도 주거실태조사", 11~17 (2012)
- 국민 주거안정을 위한 도심공급 활성화 및 보금자리 주택 건설 방안: 유형별 주택공급체계 및 공급계획 (2009~2018)추진, "국토교통부", ~ (2008)
- 주거급여 개편, 실질적인 주거지원 강화, "국토교통부", 1~3 (2013)
- "통계누리", 국토해양부[URL]
- 박능후, "국민기초생활보장 10년의 성과평가", 보건복지포럼, 167 (2010), 한국보건사회연구원
- 박미선, "미국 주택바우처 프로그램의 저소득층 주거안정 성과와 정책적 시사점", 도시행정학보, 25(2), pp.121~154 (2012), 한국도시행정학회[DOI]
- 박혁서, "임대주택시장에 있어서 공공임대주택정책의 역할에 관한 연구 - 한국과 일본의 비교분석을 중심으로 -", 주거환경, 10(3), pp.75~94 (2012), 한국주거환경학회
- "보건복지부" (2013)[URL]
- "기초생활보장수급자 변동추이" (2013), 보건복지부[URL]
- "2013년 최저생계비기준" (2013), 보건복지부[URL]
- 국민 기초생활보장제도 10년사, "보건복지부", 157~ (2010)
- 이태진, "국민기초생활보장제도와 주거보장", 보건복지포럼, 108 (2005), 한국보건사회연구원
- "국민기초생활보장법", ~
- "기준금리", 한국은행[URL]
- 홍성화, "주택시장의 내생변수가 아파트 전세가격비율에 미치는 영향분석", 주거환경, 11(1), pp.259~272 (2013), 한국주거환경학회
- "生活保護法", ~
- 厚生勞動省, "生活保護統計資料: 扶助 の種類別扶助人員" (2013)
- 厚生勞動省, "2013年度 生活保護の 住宅扶助特別基準額", pp.1~3 (2013)
- 厚生勞動省, "生活保護制度におけ る生活扶助基準額の産出方法", pp.1~ (2013)
- 厚生勞動省, "總括調査票", pp.1~ (2013)
