일본의 지역관리제도와 민간조직의 지역관리활동에 관한 연구 - TMO제도와 오사카 에리어매니지먼트제도의 비교분석 -
A Study of the Area Management Systems and the Management Activities of the Private Organizations in Japan - Comparing the TMO systems and the Osaka area management system -
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study analyzes the area management systems and management activities of private organizations in Japan. The area management activites in Japan have been organized voluntarily in the private sector for long. However, without management systems, it has been difficult to maintain these activities continuously, and it has also been difficult to secure financial resources. Due to these limitations, there have been attempts to implement area management systems in Japan since late 1990s. Among them are the TMO system and the Area Management System in the City of Osaka. The former was established in 1998 and abolished in 2006; the latter was implemented in the City of Osaka in 2014. The two are similar in that management activities are run by the private sector, but they are clearly distinguished in terms of participants and financing. This study analyzes how these differences are related to the outcomes of the area management activities. We conclude that property owners must take part in the management activites and that in order to secure stable financial resources, it is crucial to maintain profit-making business as well as imposing management fees, rather than overly relying on government subsidies.
Abstract
This study analyzes the area management systems and management activities of private organizations in Japan. The area management activites in Japan have been organized voluntarily in the private sector for long. However, without management systems, it has been difficult to maintain these activities continuously, and it has also been difficult to secure financial resources. Due to these limitations, there have been attempts to implement area management systems in Japan since late 1990s. Among them are the TMO system and the Area Management System in the City of Osaka. The former was established in 1998 and abolished in 2006; the latter was implemented in the City of Osaka in 2014. The two are similar in that management activities are run by the private sector, but they are clearly distinguished in terms of participants and financing. This study analyzes how these differences are related to the outcomes of the area management activities. We conclude that property owners must take part in the management activites and that in order to secure stable financial resources, it is crucial to maintain profit-making business as well as imposing management fees, rather than overly relying on government subsidies.
참고문헌 (15)
- 김도년, "기성시가지 활성화를 위한 지역관리시스템 도입에 관한 연구 - 미국, 영국, 일본의 지역관리시스템 분석을 중심으로 -", 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 25(08), pp.213~224 (2009), 대한건축학회
- 김도년, "대규모 개발프로젝트에서의 ‘지역관리시스템’에 관한 연구 - 동경권 개발사례에서 나타난 조직, 재원, 활동적 측면을 중심으로 -", 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 24(2), pp.273~284 (2008), 대한건축학회
- 곽동윤, "일본 지방도시 사와라시(佐原市)의 역사경관재생을 통한 중심시가지 재생전략과 방안 지역관리조직의 역할과 기능을 중심으로 ", 국토계획, 41(7), pp.97~109 (2006), 대한국토·도시계획학회
- 남진, "일본 대도시 도심부에서의 지역관리수법과 운영실태에 관한 연구", 국토계획, 37(5), pp.49~64 (2002), 대한국토·도시계획학회
- 이삼수, "외국의 중심시가지활성화를 위한 BID (Business Improvement Districts)에 관한 연구", 한국지역개발학회지, 22(1), pp.137~160 (2010), 한국지역개발학회
- 大阪市都市計劃局, "大阪市エリアマネジメ ント活動促進制度活用", pp.4~ (2015), ガイドライン
- nikkeibp, "新·公民最前線(4.8)", 2~ (2015)
- 関西経済連合会, "関西發まちづくりに吹く 新しい風", 経済人, pp.5~ (2014)
- 國土交通省, "통계자료", ~ (2014)
- 國土交通省 土地·水資源局, "エリアマネ ジメント推進マニュアル", pp.7~8 (2008)
- みずほ総合研究所, "新まちづくり3法で中心 市街地は活性化するのか", pp.6~ (2006)
- 中心市街地の活性化に関する行政 評価・監視結果に基づく勧告, "総務省", 2~4 (2004)
- "大阪市エリアマネジメント活動促進條 例", ~
- "中心市街地における市街地の整備改善及び商業 等の活性化の一体的推進に関する法律", ~
- 日本·京都大學經營管理大學院, "統計資料", ~ (2015)
