汉韩反诘语气副词二语习得比较 ― 以中韩学生为例
A Comparison on Chinese and Korean Interrogative Adverbs in Foreign Language Acquisition : Taking Chinese and Korean Students for Example
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
反诘语气副词在汉韩两种语言中都是比较特殊的一类，句法位置灵活，语义虚灵，因此是对外汉语教学和韩国语教学的难点之一。本文以中韩两国学生为考察对象，对其在使用汉韩反诘语气副词情况进行了问卷调查，并从句法和语义两个角度考察了汉韩反诘语气副词的偏误情况。句法分布偏误有句首错序偏误和句中错序偏误，句法组合偏误有语气词错用偏误和助动词错用偏误，语义偏误有反诘义理解偏误和现实与非现实义理解偏误。其中句法组合的偏误率最高，这是因为汉韩两种语言的差异在反诘语气副词组合特征上体现得最多，学生受到母语的影响产生诸多的偏误，这部分是汉韩反诘语气副词教学的重点和难点，对偏误率高的个别反诘语气副词需要进行针对性教学。
Abstract
Abstract: Rhetorical modal adverbs are a special kind in both Chinese and Korean languages. They have flexible syntactic positions and empty sematic meanings. Therefore, they are one of the difficulties in teaching Chinese as a foreign language and Korean language. Taking Chinese and Korean students as the research object, this paper makes a questionnaire survey on the use of Chinese and Korean rhetorical modal adverbs, and analyses the errors of Chinese and Korean rhetorical modal adverbs from the perspective of syntax and semantics. The syntactic distribution errors include the wrong ordering at the beginning and middle of the sentence. The syntactic combination errors include the misuse of modal particles and auxiliary verbs. The semantic errors include the misunderstanding of rhetorical meaning and the misunderstanding of realistic and non-realistic meaning. Among these, the error rate of syntactic combination is the highest. This is because the differences between Chinese and Korean are reflected most in the combination characteristics of rhetorical modal adverbs. Students are influenced by their mother tongue and have many errors. This part is the key and difficult point in the teaching of rhetorical modal adverbs. It is necessary to carry out targeted teaching for individual rhetorical modal adverbs with high error rate.
참고문헌 (15)
- 符达维, "不宜扩大反问句的范围", 中国语文天地 (1989)
- 齐沪杨, "语气词与语气系统", pp.105~ (2002), 安徽教育出版社
- 邵敬敏, "现代汉语疑问句研究", pp.18~ (1996), 华东师范大学出版社
- 袁毓麟, "词类范畴的家族相似性", 中国社会科学, pp.154~170 (1995)
- 吴善子, "汉韩反诘语气副词对比研究", 博士, pp.2010
- 김세중, "의미와 번역：영어와 한국어 수사 의문문의 비교 연구를 중심으로", 영어교육연구, (18), pp.81~86 (1998)
- 남철진, "HSK 123급（초급）어휘와 중국어 핵심 어휘" (2019), 신아사
- 박지숙, "국어 의문형 서법 부사 연구", 석사, 국어교육, pp.2002
- 서상규, "한국어 기본어휘 의미빈도 사전" (2014), 한국문화사
- 서정수, "’-ㄹ것’ 에 대하여", 국어학, 6 (1978)
- 오선자, "조선어와 중국어 서법의 실현 양상 대조", 중국조선어문, pp.24~28 (2011)
- 赵明德, "HSK 어휘—고급 9—11급" (2007), 다락원
- 한민이, "HSK 중급편—중국어 어휘의 달인이 되는 법" (2015), 사람in
- 한민이, "HSK 고급편—중국어 어휘의 달인이 되는 법" (2016), 사람in
- 황종배, "제2언어 습득의 원리와 연구 동향 — 한국의 영어교육을 중심으로", pp.1~ (2019), 한국문화사