语序类型学视角下的汉韩介词联系项对比
A Typological Comparison of Word Order Between Chinese and Korean Adpositions
4
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
本文根据语序类型学理论，确立汉韩介词联系项系统，考察汉韩介词联系项的句法功能和语义功能，并在此基础上进行对比分析，证实类型学参项内容。汉语的介词、韩语的一些助词和惯用型都为动词介引间接论元，表明动词与之论元之间的关系，具有介词联系项功能。汉韩两种语言的介词（韩语的助词和惯用型）在介宾短语内的介词语序类型以及数量上有较大的差异：汉语有前置介词、后置介词和框式介词，数量也不断增多，属于半开放性词项，而韩语只有后置介词，数量少而较稳定，是半封闭性词项。汉语前置介词和韩语后置介词是类型学上的和谐组配，汉语和韩语的介词参项特点符合类型学共性原则，反映了SVO类型语言和SOV类型语言的介词联系项差异。汉韩介词中表境事和关事的介词比较多，而表比事、因事、主事和客事的介词都比较少。
Abstract
Based on the theories of word order typology, this study intends to establish the system of adpositionsfrom Chinese and Koreanin terms of typological parametersbyexamining and comparing their syntactic and semantic functions. Many Chinese prepositions and Koreangrammaticalauxiliaries areadposition universals in preposition-based argument structure for leveragingsubject and predicate relationship. Chinese has an increasing number of prepositions, postpositions and circumpositionsina semi-open state, but Korean has a relatively small and stable number of postpositions in a semi-closed form.Despite the discrepancy ofnumbers and types between the two languages, Chinese preposition and Korean postposition are congenial pairs from a typological perspective,indicating the contrast of adpositions between SVO and SOV languages,given that both languages havemore adpositionsof situational and relational functionsthan of comparative, causal,subjective and predicative functions.
참고문헌 (16)
- 刘丹青, "语序类型学与介词理论" (2003), 商务印书馆
- 黄伯荣, "《现代汉语》下册" (2002), 高等教育出版社
- 陈昌来, "介词与介引功能" (2002), 安徽教育出版社
- 张 斌, "现代汉语" (2001), 商务印书馆
- 宣德五, "朝鲜语基础语法" (1997), 商务印书馆
- 刘沛霖, "韩国语惯用句型" (1996), 东北朝鲜民族教育出版社出版
- 刘丹青, "汉语中的框式介词", 当代语言学, 4(4) (2002)
- 张旺熹, "汉语介词衍生的语义机制", 汉语学习, (1) (2004)
- 吕叔湘, "方位词使用情况的初步考察", 中国语文, (3) (1965)
- 张谊生, "介词叠加的方式与类别、作用与后果", 语文研究, (1) (2013)
- 延世大学韩国语学堂, "延世韩国语2" (2014), 世界图书出版公司
- 고창수, "한국어 후치사와 중국어 개사의 단어적 성격에 대하여", 국어교육학연구, (45), pp.115~133 (2012), 국어교육학회[DOI]
- 서정수, "국어문법（国语文法）" (2006), 黑龙江朝鲜民族出版社
- 전정예, "유형론적 관점에서 본 한국어와 중국어의 어순 비교", 한말연구, (32), pp.177~211 (2013), 한말연구학회[DOI]
- 양 기, "한국어 조사와 중국어 개사의 유형론적 대조 연구", 박사, pp.2019
- 첨 연, "한국어와 중국어 품사의 유형론적 대조 연구:영어의 현상과 관련하여", 석사, pp.2017