韩汉语的复数标记
Korean and Chinese Plural Markers
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
类型学家在世界语言调查的基础上，对世界语言的多种数范畴进行了总结。我们根据这一研究成果确定了韩国语、汉语、英语复数标记的归属类型。从整体上看，韩汉两种语言的复数标记性质与英语不同，都属于通数语言。同时，我们发现韩汉语的复数范畴有同有异，本文从语义、句法、语用等多个角度进行分析，从而给出了韩汉语复数标记的显赫度差异。根据库藏类型学的研究，复数标记应该还与量词有关系，韩汉语的量词在用法上、显赫度上具有一定的差别。因此我们还总结了韩汉语量词显赫度的差别，进而考察了韩汉语复数标记和量词之间的关联性。汉语量词显赫，但是复数标记没有韩国语那样发达。韩国语量词未有汉语一样发达，但其复数标记相对汉语来说比较发达。希望本文分析有助于我们更加深入把握并灵活运用两种语言的复数标记；同时，在一定程度上为库藏类型学理论提供一定的数据支撑。
Abstract
On the basis of the investigation of world languages, typologists have summarized the various categories of Numbers of world languages. According to this research result, we can determine which category Korean, Chinese and English plural marks belong to. As a whole, Korean and Chinese belong to general number languages, which are different from English in the nature of plural markers. At the same time, we will find that there are similarities and differences in the plural categories of Korean and Chinese. This paper analyzes from multiple perspectives such as semantics, syntax, and pragmatics, so as to give the prominence difference of Korean and Chinese plural markers. According to the research of library linguistic typology, plural marks should also be related to quantifiers, and there are certain differences in usage and prominence between Korean and Chinese quantifiers. Therefore, we will also summarize the differences in the prominence of Korean and Chinese quantifiers, and then investigate the correlation between Korean and Chinese plural markers and quantifiers. Chinese quantifiers are prominent, but plural marks are not as developed as Korean. Korean quantifiers are not as developed as Chinese, but its plural marks are more developed than Chinese.
참고문헌 (22)
- 崔 健, "韩国语对比论文集" (2012), 北京语言大学出版社
- 陈振宇, "汉语的小句与句子" (2016), 复旦大学出版社
- 金立鑫, "什么是语言类型学" (2011), 上海外语教育出版社
- 郭先珍, "现代汉语量词用法词典" (2002), 语文出版社
- 刘丹青, "语言类型学" (2017), 中西书局
- 陆丙甫, "语言类型学教程" (2015), 北京大学出版社
- 沈家煊, "不对称和标记论" (1999), 江西教育出版社
- 王 力, "中国现代语法" (1985), 商务印书馆
- 김수정, "복수 표지 '-들'의 실현 양상에 대한 유형론적 연구", 석사, 국어학, pp.2011
- 박정구, "유형론적 관점에서 본 중국어 분류사의 발전 및 그와 한국어의 관련성", 國語學, (63), pp.391~412 (2012), 국어학회[DOI]
- 백미현, "한국어 복수 의미 연구", 담화와 인지, 9(2), pp.59~78 (2002), 담화·인지언어학회
- 이상섭, "외국 참고서에서 보는 한국어에 대한 시각", 새국어생활, 8 (1998), 국립국어연구원
- 이남순, "단수(單數)와 복수(複數)", 국어학, 11 (1982), 국어학회
- 정제한, "문법연구와 자료: 이익섭 선생 회갑 기념 논총" (1998), 태학사
- 채 완, "국어 분류사의 기능과 의미", 진단학보, 70 (1990), 진단학회
- 채옥자, "조선어와 한어의 분류사범주의 대조", 중국조선어문, 195 (2014), 길림성민족사무위원회
- 桑紫宏, "从汉英数范畴的差异看汉语复数标记“们”与数词的不兼容", 华东师范大学学报, (1) (2016)
- 闫 超, "韩汉语复数标记“들”与“们”的对比研究", 硕士, pp.2011
- 郑美英, "韩汉复数标记“들”与“们”的对比研究", 硕士, pp.2011
- 张谊生, ""N"+"们"的选择限制与"N们"的表义功用", 中国语文, (3) (2001)
- Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y, "Classifiers : A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices" (2000), Oxfor d University Press
- Corbett, C. G., "Number" (2004), Cambridge University Press