한중일 복수 표현 대조 연구-한중일 영문 대역본을 중심으로
A Comparative Study on Plurality Makers of Korean, Chinese and Japanese
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is about the plurality makers of nouns in Korean, Chinese and Japanese. It is common in Indo-European languages to encode plurality with a suffix, and it is a major grammar category. But KCJ have in common that plurality markers are optional rather than obligatory, because bare nouns tend to mean plural rather than singular in KCJ. But it does not correspond to mark plural suffixes between the three languages. In this paper, we analyzed the plural suffixes of the three languages in translated text from an original text in English. The results are as follows: Chinese has the largest number of noun suffixes, followed by Korean and then Japanese. But it is Korean that has the largest number when restricted to common nouns. Korean most closely reflects English plurality, while Chinese and Japanese use bare nouns or numerals. It is thought that Chinese and Japanese plural makers work as a reference or empathy maker.
Abstract
This paper is about the plurality makers of nouns in Korean, Chinese and Japanese. It is common in Indo-European languages to encode plurality with a suffix, and it is a major grammar category. But KCJ have in common that plurality markers are optional rather than obligatory, because bare nouns tend to mean plural rather than singular in KCJ. But it does not correspond to mark plural suffixes between the three languages. In this paper, we analyzed the plural suffixes of the three languages in translated text from an original text in English. The results are as follows: Chinese has the largest number of noun suffixes, followed by Korean and then Japanese. But it is Korean that has the largest number when restricted to common nouns. Korean most closely reflects English plurality, while Chinese and Japanese use bare nouns or numerals. It is thought that Chinese and Japanese plural makers work as a reference or empathy maker.
참고문헌 (20)
- 찰스 두히그, "습관의 힘" (2012), 갤리온
- 查爾斯杜希格, "習慣的力量" (2013), 中信出版社
- Duhhig, C, "The Power of Habit" (2012), Random House
- チャールズデュヒッグ, "習慣の力" (2013), 講談社
- 仁田義雄, "日本語文法研究序説─日本語の記述文法を目指して" (1997), くろしお出版
- 정상희, "한국어 배분 표지 '들, 마다, 끼리, 씩'에 대한 연구", 석사, 국어학, pp.2010
- 김영민, "현대중국어의 복수 표현 연구 ― ‘們’과 원형명사 복수 의미 비교를 중심으로", 중국어문학논집, (63), pp.115~131 (2010), 중국어문학연구회
- 김영민, "현대중국어 명사구 양화 표현이 나타내는 양의 성격 고찰", 중국언어연구, (37), pp.139~159 (2011), 한국중국언어학회
- 박민영, "일본어의 복수를 나타내는 ‘~たちtachi’와 한국어의 ‘~들dul’의 대조 연구", 일본연구, (64), pp.291~309 (2015), 일본연구소[DOI]
- 방향옥, "중·한 복수접미사 ‘-們'과 ‘-들’의 대조 연구", 중국인문과학, (44), pp.53~72 (2010), 중국인문학회
- 신미경, "중국어 ‘们’과 한국어 ‘들’의 복수표현 대조 연구 - 한국인 학습자의 ‘们’ 첨가 현상을 중심으로", 중국학연구, (63), pp.27~45 (2013), 중국학연구회
- 왕효성, "한국어와 중국어의 복수표지에 대한 비교－‘들’과 ‘们’을 중심으로－", 언어학 연구, (22), pp.149~162 (2012), 한국중원언어학회[DOI]
- 전영철, "한국어 복수 표현의 의미론: ‘들’의 통합적 해석", 언어학, (49), pp.337~359 (2007), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 조의연, "사람명사 복수표현의 영한번역전략에 대한 비판적 소고", 번역학연구, 13(1), pp.267~281 (2012), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 최형강, "복수와 반복 －‘들’의 의미 기능을 중심으로－", 한국어 의미학, 27, pp.315~341 (2008), 한국어의미학회
- 林立红, "英汉名词複數标记语的句法－语义制约对比研究", 寧波大学学报, 26(5), pp.71~75 (2013)
- 郭华, "类型学视角下的汉语附属範疇研究", 郑州航空工业管理学院学报, 32(3), pp.82~84 (2013)
- Li, Jie, "The Referential Properties of Chinese Noun Phrases", pp.61~84 (1997), Centre de Recherches Linguistiques sur I'Asie Orientale
- Li, Y-H. A., "Plurality in a classifier language", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 8, pp.75~99 (1999)
- Makino, S., "Swift in number assignment in Japanese discourse: Applying Theory and Research to Learning Japanese as a Foreign Language", pp.168~179 (2007), Cambridge Scholars Publishing