『聊斋志异』与『天倪录』伦理结构与伦理意识的比较
A Comparison of Ethical Structure and Ethical Consciousness in 『LiaoZhaiZhiYi(聊斋志异)』 and 『TianNiLu(天倪录)』
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
文学文本中的普遍性伦理现象是文学伦理学批评中重点关注的问题，文学作品中的伦理问题体现在伦理线和伦理结中，二者又共同织就了文学文本中的整个伦理结构，深刻反映了作品中的伦理意识。其中，伦理线从宏观方面表现了作品的伦理主线及主导性伦理问题的发生发展状况；伦理结从微观方面表现了作品中的基本伦理问题及矛盾和冲突还有伦理困境的形成与消解。因此，本文选取中韩两国古代志怪小说的代表作『聊斋志异』与『天倪录』，主要从两部作品艺术设置中的伦理线和伦理叙事中的伦理结这两个方面来分析作品中的伦理结构和伦理内涵。包括艺术设置中非人形象与作者自评对伦理线的体现，以及类型叙事对伦理结的建构和因果报应叙事对伦理结的解构这几个方面。运用比较研究的分析方法，探讨两部作品中体现出的不同层次的伦理意识和伦理内涵，阐述不同国家时代背景下的伦理问题和伦理原因，提供伦理启发。
Abstract
The universal ethical phenomenon in literary texts is a key concern in literary ethics criticism. Ethical issues in literary works are reflected in ethical line and ethical knot, and the two together weave the entire literary text. The ethical structure deeply reflects the ethical consciousness in the works. Among them, the ethical line shows the main ethical line of the work and the occurrence and development of leading ethical issues from a macro perspective；The ethical knot shows the basic ethical issues, contradictions and conflicts in the works, as well as the formation and resolution of ethical dilemmas from the microcosmic aspect. Therefore, this article selects the masterpieces of ancient strange novels in China and South Korea, 『LiaoZhaiZhiYi(聊斋志异)』 and 『TianNiLu(天倪录)』, to explore the ethical consciousness embodied in the works. The ethical structure and ethical connotation in the works are mainly analyzed from the two aspects of the ethical line in the artistic setting of the two works and the ethical knot in the ethical narrative.Including the embodiment of non-human images in the art setting and the author's self-evaluation on the ethical line, as well as the construction of the ethical knot by the genre narrative and the deconstruction of the ethical knot by the karma narrative.Using the analytical method of comparative research, explore the different levels of ethical consciousness and ethical connotation reflected in the two works, explain the ethical issues and ethical reasons under the background of different countries and times, and provide ethical inspiration.
참고문헌 (19)
- 임 방, "천예록" (2005), 성균관대학교출판부
- 鲁 迅, "中国小说史略" (2006), 上海古籍出版社
- 马振方, "聊斋志异评赏大成" (1992), 漓江出版社
- 聂珍钊, "文学伦理学批评导论" (2014), 北京大学出版社
- 蒲松龄, "全本新注聊斋志异" (1995), 人民文学出版社
- 韦勒克, "文学理论" (1984), 三联书店
- 박현숙(朴賢淑), "朝鮮後期 野談集 所載 奇異談의 特性 考察 －『天倪錄』을 中心으로－", 어문연구(語文硏究), 36(2), pp.397~422 (2008), 한국어문교육연구회[DOI]
- 이근석, "《요재지이(聊齋志異)》의 논찬(論贊)으로 살펴본 이야기의 윤리적 기능", 중국어문학지, (63), pp.205~226 (2018), 중국어문학회[DOI]
- 邓大情, "中韩古代小说自我评点之比较——以『聊斋志异』和『天倪录』为中心", 延边大学学报(社会科学版), (2) (2014)
- HAN YUXIANG, "流媒體平台上以『西遊記』爲原型的IP產出與市場反應 - 以动漫『西行纪』为中心", 중국학, (80), pp.89~114 (2022), 대한중국학회[DOI]
- 黄英龙, "『聊斋志异』曲终奏雅艺术探析——评“异史氏曰”的得失", 忻州师范学院学报, (3) (2009)
- 金程丰, "明清时期西方人对中国官吏制度的认识", 广东教育学院学报, (5) (2000)
- 刘尚云, "论『聊斋志异』叙事主体的自觉意识", 长城, (12) (2009)
- 李 娟, "“异史氏曰”——『聊斋志异』中的干预叙述者", 河池学院学报(哲学社会科学版), (3) (2006)
- 赵玉霞, "『聊斋志异』与因果观", 蒲松龄研究, (2) (2017)
- 张 践, "因果报应论对传统政治正义观的补充", 理论学刊, (1) (2007)
- 张慧禾, "『聊斋志异』对『史记』的继承与发展", 语文学刊, (5) (2004)
- 马李莉, "宋代文言小说报应题材研究", 硕士, pp.2019
- 袁娅楠, "『聊斋志异』科举题材小说研究", 硕士, pp.2020