설교의 효율적 커뮤니케이션을 위한 논리프레임 활용

Abstract

This study was written to suggest preaching logic that preachers can use easily in the field. There are several theories as to why sermons are hard to listen today. Craddock criticized that the traditional preaching of the past was too declarative and theoretical and was not able to capture the hearts of the audience because it was separated from the lives of the modern audience, and insisted on a paradigm shift to inductive preaching. However, such a claim may lead to the uselessness of deductive preaching, which is traditional preaching, and may lead to a false perception that there is a separate sermon structure suitable for modern society. This thesis assumes that the appropriate method for preaching does not depend on the past and present, but should be appropriately applied according to the speech context or the audience. It is argued that the purpose of the sermon is to be thoroughly modified according to how to communicate with the audience. Therefore, this study presented some logical frames as the most useful communication method, and some sermon logics tailored to the frame. One is Bible-reality, the second is problem-solution, or problem-cause-solution, the third is observation-clarification-meaning-request, and the fifth is Bible-interpretation-meaning-application. These logical frames are considered to be a core structure that can be applied to our sermons in light of the typicality of sermons experienced by the researcher, but I think that various modifications are possible as needed in the field. It is expected that by referring to and learning the logical frames presented in this study, preachers can use them as a guide for effective communication in the field of ministry.