본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Interlanguage Pragmatics Study of Compliments among Thai EFL Learners

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study compares how the native speakers of Thai (TTs) and American (AEs) as well as the Thai learners of English as a foreign language with high exposure to English (TEHs) and those with the low exposure (TELs) perform the speech acts of compliments (Cs) by taking the context of age into their consideration. The data were collected by means of a written discourse completion task (WDCT). The analysis of the data examined the pragmatic structures and in particular, strategies of Cs. The six pragmatic structures in terms of head acts [H] and supportive moves (S) were found. They were [H] only, [H]+(S), [H]+(S)+[H], (S)+[H], (S)+[H]+(S), and (S) only. Surprisingly, as opposed to other speech act studies, the AEs showed their preferences towards (S)-oriented structures while the TELs tended to favour [H]- oriented structures in giving Cs in all given situations in the context of age. A closer look at the C strategies exhibited cultural specific preferences among the AEs and the TTs which explain the interlanguage phenomena among the TEHs and the TELs. The interlanguage phenomena found in the two groups of learners may be seen as their incomplete mastery of English but they also could be interpreted as the communication strategies of the TEHs and the TELs to smooth their interactions in English.

Abstract

This study compares how the native speakers of Thai (TTs) and American (AEs) as well as the Thai learners of English as a foreign language with high exposure to English (TEHs) and those with the low exposure (TELs) perform the speech acts of compliments (Cs) by taking the context of age into their consideration. The data were collected by means of a written discourse completion task (WDCT). The analysis of the data examined the pragmatic structures and in particular, strategies of Cs. The six pragmatic structures in terms of head acts [H] and supportive moves (S) were found. They were [H] only, [H]+(S), [H]+(S)+[H], (S)+[H], (S)+[H]+(S), and (S) only. Surprisingly, as opposed to other speech act studies, the AEs showed their preferences towards (S)-oriented structures while the TELs tended to favour [H]- oriented structures in giving Cs in all given situations in the context of age. A closer look at the C strategies exhibited cultural specific preferences among the AEs and the TTs which explain the interlanguage phenomena among the TEHs and the TELs. The interlanguage phenomena found in the two groups of learners may be seen as their incomplete mastery of English but they also could be interpreted as the communication strategies of the TEHs and the TELs to smooth their interactions in English.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. Aston, G., "Interlanguage pragmatics", pp.224~250 (1993), Oxford University Press
  2. Austin, J. L., "How to do things with words" (1962), Harvard University Press
  3. Baba, J., "Interlanguage pragmatics study of indirect complaint among Japanese ESL learners", Sino-US English Teaching, 7(12), pp.23~32 (2010)
  4. Bayraktaroğlu, A., "Pragmatics and beyond new series, 88", pp.xiv~ (2001), John Benjamins
  5. Blum-Kulka, S., "Requests and apologies: A crosscultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP)", Applied Linguistics, 5(1), pp.196~213 (1984)
  6. Bongaerts, T., "Communication strategies in L1 and L2: Same or different?", Applied Linguistics, 10(3), pp.253~268 (1989)
  7. Brown, P., "Question and politeness: Strategies in social interaction", pp.60~289 (1978), Cambridge University Press
  8. Bühler, K., "The theory of language: The representational function of language (Sprachtheorie)", pp.35~ (1990), John Benjamins
  9. Faerch, C., "Strategies in interlanguage communication", pp.210~239 (1983), Longman
  10. Farenkia, B. M., "Speech acts and regional variations in French: The case of compliments on skills in Cameroon and Canadian French", Speech and Context, 2(III), pp.1~19 (2011)
  11. Firth, J. R., "Papers in linguistics 1934-1951", pp.177~179 (1969), Oxford University Press
  12. Goffman, E, "On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements of social interaction", Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 18(3), pp.213~231 (1955)
  13. Grice, P. H., "Syntax and semantics III: Speech acts", pp.41~58 (1975), Academic Press
  14. Hall, E. T., "Beyond culture" (1976), Anchor Press
  15. Herbert, R. K., "Contrastive pragmatics", pp.3~35 (1989), John Benjamins
  16. Herbert, R. K., "Sex-based differences in compliment behavior", Language in Society, 19(2), pp.201~224 (1990)
  17. Hill, B., "Universals of linguistics politeness : Quantitative evidence from Japanese and American English", Journal of Pragmatics, 10, pp.347~371 (1986)
  18. Holmes, J., "Compliments and compliment responses in New Zealand English", Anthropological Linguistics, 28(4), pp.485~508 (1988)
  19. Kasper, G., "Linguistic politeness : Current research issues", Journal of Pragmatics, 14, pp.193~218 (2009)
  20. Kavanagh, B., "A cross-cultural analysis of Japanese and English nonverbal online communication : The use of emoticons in weblogs", Intercultural Communication Studies, 19(3), pp.65~80 (2010)
  21. Knutson, T. J., "A cross-cultural comparison of Thai and US American rhetorical sensitivity : Implications for intercultural communication effectiveness", International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, pp.63~78 (2003)
  22. Lakoff, R., "Language and a woman’s place", Language and Society, pp.8~19 (1975)
  23. Leech, G., "Principles of pragmatics" (1983), Longman
  24. Lewandowska-tomaszczyk, B., "Contrastive pragmatics", pp.73~100 (1989), John Benjamins
  25. Locher, M. A., "Introducing relational work in Facebook and discussion boards", Pragmatics, 25(1), pp.1~21 (2015)
  26. Manes, J., "Conversational routine: Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech", pp.115~132 (1981), Mouton de Gruyter
  27. McCarthy, M., "New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms", pp.51~75 (2001), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  28. Modehiran, P., "Correction making among Thais and Americans: A study of cross-cultural and interlanguage pragmatics", doctoral, pp.2005
  29. Mustapha, A. S., "A functional approach in identifying compliment data", Rice Working Papers in Linguistics, 3, pp.1~15 (2012)
  30. Phoocharoensil, S., "L2 English compliment responses : An investigation of pragmatic transfer", International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 1(6), pp.276~287 (2012)
  31. Pongprairat, R., "A study of interlanguage English intonation in Thai learners, and the degree of intelligibility and comprehensibility in native speaker’s judgments", doctoral, pp.2011
  32. Schoknecht, C., "Interdisciplinary approaches to language processing", pp.329~336 (2000), NECTEC
  33. Searle, J., "The Classification of illocutionary acts", Language in Society, 5(1), pp.1~24 (1976)
  34. Selinker, L., "Interlanguage", International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(3), pp.209~231 (1972)
  35. Sudasna Na Ayudhya, P., "Models of mental lexicon in bilinguals with high and low second language experience: an experimental study of lexical access", doctoral, pp.2002
  36. Taavitsainen, I., "Speech acts in the history of English", pp.195~228 (2008), John Benjamins
  37. Tannen, D., "You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation" (1990), William Morrow
  38. Tarnisarn, K., "The relationship between the English language experience and the identification ability of English words with vowel reduction by Thai students", master’s, pp.2011
  39. Thavorn, S., "The interpretation of syntactic ambiguity in English sentences by Thai students with high and low English language experience", master’s, pp.2011
  40. Wierzbicka, A., "Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction" (1991), Mouton de Gruyter
  41. Wiroonhachaipong, P., "Structures and strategies of requests in Thai and American English: A contrastive pragmatic study", master’s, pp.2000
  42. Wolfson, N., "Sociolinguistics and language acquisition: Series on issues in second language research", pp.82~95 (1983), Newbury House
  43. Wongaram, P., "A comparison of strategies and errors of Thai students with different English language experiences in the formation of English words equivalent to Thai compounds", master’s, pp.2011
  44. Worathumrong, S., "A cross-cultural pragmatic study: Complimenting in American English and Thai contemporary novels", Proceedings of the second Postgraduate and Academic Researchers in Linguistics at York (PARLAY 2014) conference, 2, pp.143~155 (2015)
  45. Xu, L., "Reliability and validity of WDCT in testing interlanguage pragmatic competence for EFL learners", Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(6), pp.1206~1215 (2015)
  46. Yousefvand, Z., "Study of compliment speech act realization patterns across gender in Persian", Arizona Working Papers in SLA & Teaching, 17, pp.91~112 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)