본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

해방정국에서 공산세력의 반란전 실패가 주는 시사점

The Implications of the Failure of Insurgency of Communist Forces in the South Korean Liberation Situation

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류군사학

초록

The South Korean Worker’s Party, led by Park, Heon-young in the Korean liberation situation, carried out a insurgency to overthrow the South Korean government, but failed. This paper analyzed the reasons why the communist forces at that time failed and drew up the implications. The framework of the analysis used five variables: first, complaints and interests of the collective members; second, organization and leadership of the challenger; third, internal mobilization and external support of the challenger; fourth, strategic tactics of the challenger; and finally, sanctuaries for the survival of the challenger. In the Korean liberation situation, the South Korean communist forces initially gathered the disgruntled forces for effective causes, such as land reform and the liquidation of Japanese colonial rule, to gain support. However, Park, Hun-young, who should rally and lead the disgruntled forces, failed to show proper leadership. Inadequate offensive tactics and brutal violent events led to the loss of public support, without effective support from the North, and could not establish a proper sanctuaries, eventually ending up in a strong crackdown by the government. On the other hand, the South Korean government removed the biggest source of discontent among the people by pushing for farmland reform. They succeeded in winning the people’s hearts by gradually resolving the causes of public discontent, including the withdrawal of the U.S. military government and the free general elections, and reflecting the will of the people in state affairs. Through this, it succeeded in neutralizing the cause of the Communist Forces, isolating them from the masses, and eventually extinguishing them.

Abstract

The South Korean Worker’s Party, led by Park, Heon-young in the Korean liberation situation, carried out a insurgency to overthrow the South Korean government, but failed. This paper analyzed the reasons why the communist forces at that time failed and drew up the implications. The framework of the analysis used five variables: first, complaints and interests of the collective members; second, organization and leadership of the challenger; third, internal mobilization and external support of the challenger; fourth, strategic tactics of the challenger; and finally, sanctuaries for the survival of the challenger. In the Korean liberation situation, the South Korean communist forces initially gathered the disgruntled forces for effective causes, such as land reform and the liquidation of Japanese colonial rule, to gain support. However, Park, Hun-young, who should rally and lead the disgruntled forces, failed to show proper leadership. Inadequate offensive tactics and brutal violent events led to the loss of public support, without effective support from the North, and could not establish a proper sanctuaries, eventually ending up in a strong crackdown by the government. On the other hand, the South Korean government removed the biggest source of discontent among the people by pushing for farmland reform. They succeeded in winning the people’s hearts by gradually resolving the causes of public discontent, including the withdrawal of the U.S. military government and the free general elections, and reflecting the will of the people in state affairs. Through this, it succeeded in neutralizing the cause of the Communist Forces, isolating them from the masses, and eventually extinguishing them.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. 국방부군사편찬연구소, "6․25전쟁사 1: 전쟁의 배경과 원인" (2004)
  2. 국방부군사편찬연구소, "6․25전쟁사, 제1집 제주 “4․3사건 수정문,”" (2004)
  3. 국방부전사편찬위원회, "비정규전사(1945~1960)" (1988)
  4. 김남식, "남로당연구" (1984), 돌베개
  5. 김영모, "한국사회계층연구" (1982), 일조각
  6. 김영모, "한국민족해방운동 연구" (2012), 고헌
  7. 김점곤, "한국전쟁과 노동당전략" (1973), 박영사
  8. 대검찰청 조사국, "좌익사건실록 제1권" (1965)
  9. 毛澤東, "모택동선집" (2002), 범우사
  10. 안재성, "이현상평전" (2010), 실천문학사
  11. 윤장호, "호국경찰전사" (1995), 제일
  12. 이대근, "해방후-1950년대의 경제-공업화의 사적 배경연구" (2002), 삼성연구소
  13. 이승엽, "근로자 1950년 6호", ~ (1950)
  14. 임희섭, "집합행동과 사회운동의 이론" (2009), 고려대학교출판부
  15. 정광호, "전남유격전투사" (2010), 선인
  16. 조선은행 조사부, "조선경제연감" (1948)
  17. 한국역사연구회, "한국현대사 1 해방직후의 변혁운동과 미군정" (1991), 풀빛
  18. 解放軍文藝出版社, "모택동 자서전" (2002), 다락원
  19. Charles Tilly, "From Mobilization to Revolution" (1978), Addison-Wessley Publishing Company
  20. "U.S. Army FM 3-24 Counterinsurgency Field Manual", The University of Chicago Press, ~ (2006)
  21. "U.S. Joint Publication 3-24 Counterinsurgency Operations", ~ (2009)
  22. 김기호, "한반도 “제4세대전쟁” 패러다임과 한국의 대응전략" (2012), 국방대학교
  23. 이선아, "한국전쟁 전후 빨찌산의 형성과 활동", 역사연구, (13), pp.155~188 (2003), 역사학연구소
  24. 조국통일사, "주체의 기치 따라 나아가는 남조선인민들의 투쟁" (1982), 조국통일사
  25. 최장옥, "제4세대 전쟁에서 군사적 약자의 장기전 수행전략에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2015
  26. 한도현, "한국현대사의재인식 4" (1998), 오름
  27. "제주4·3사건 진상규명 및 희생자명예회복에 관한 특별법", ~
  28. "스티코프비망록 3. 3당합당", 중앙일보, 1995년 5월 16일자, 10~ (1995)
  29. "중앙일보 1995년 5월 11일자", 9~ (1995)
  30. "조선로동당규약 2010.9.28. 개정" (2010)[URL]
  31. "대한민국법제 50년사"[URL]
  32. "최고조 치닫는 북·미간 말폭탄...문대통령, 지금은 압박할 때" (2017)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)