비대칭전략의 유형과 사례분석 그리고 교훈
Study on the Type, Case Analysis and Lesson of Asymmetrical Strategy
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
An asymmetrical strategy means a war-performing method that makes the enemy unimaginable in terms of types, dimensions and forms via the analysis of my strengths and the enemy’s weaknesses. Due to the possibility of victory opened to the weak, it can be differentiated in its strategic dimension, level and type utilized in the East and West as well as in the past and present times. This inquiry analyses the Mao’s guerilla war and U-boat’s pack of wolves war as the representative case study based on the Metz and Johnson’s classification of the asymmetrical strategy. As a result, this study is reached at the following conclusion: First, an asymmetrical strategy has a powerful effect in a way that it controls the win or lose of war in the land and sea wars. Second, despite of its effects, it does not guarantee the victory by using the strategy by itself. Third, to win the battle and war, one must to apply the strategy flexibly. The asymmetrical war will be fall into the failure if he or she does not grasp and apply it flexibly according to the changes of time, opinions and situations. This study contends that South Korea needs to research and develop her own symmetrical strategy faced with North Korea and strong neighboring countries in Northeast Asia.
Abstract
An asymmetrical strategy means a war-performing method that makes the enemy unimaginable in terms of types, dimensions and forms via the analysis of my strengths and the enemy’s weaknesses. Due to the possibility of victory opened to the weak, it can be differentiated in its strategic dimension, level and type utilized in the East and West as well as in the past and present times. This inquiry analyses the Mao’s guerilla war and U-boat’s pack of wolves war as the representative case study based on the Metz and Johnson’s classification of the asymmetrical strategy. As a result, this study is reached at the following conclusion: First, an asymmetrical strategy has a powerful effect in a way that it controls the win or lose of war in the land and sea wars. Second, despite of its effects, it does not guarantee the victory by using the strategy by itself. Third, to win the battle and war, one must to apply the strategy flexibly. The asymmetrical war will be fall into the failure if he or she does not grasp and apply it flexibly according to the changes of time, opinions and situations. This study contends that South Korea needs to research and develop her own symmetrical strategy faced with North Korea and strong neighboring countries in Northeast Asia.
참고문헌 (31)
- 국방군사연구소, "중국인민해방군사" (1998)
- 국방군사연구소, "중공군의 전략전술 변천사" (1996)
- 마오쩌둥, "마오쩌둥 주요문선" (2018), 학고당
- 박창희, "현대 중국 전략의 기원" (2011), 플래닛미디어
- 방위사업청, "장보고-Ⅲ 잠수함 개발 성공을 위한 외국 잠수함 성공·실패사례 교훈분석", 대한조선학회 (2015)
- 손자, "손자병법" (2018), 휴머니스트 출판그룹
- 앙투안 앙리 조미니, "전쟁술" (2014), 책세상
- 한용섭, "미·일·중·러의 군사전략" (2018), 한울아카데미 : 한울엠플러스
- 해군대학, "세계해전사" (1998)
- Clausewitz, Carl von, "On War" (2008), Oxford University
- Cordesman, Anthony, "The Iraq War: Strategy, Tactics, and Military Lessons" (2003), Praeger
- Gray, Colins S., "Modern Strategy" (1999), Oxford University Press
- Engaging Power for Peace: The 1998 Strategic Assessment, "Institute for National Strategic Studies", National Defense University, ~ (1998)
- Joint Publication (herafter Joint Pub) 1, "Joint Warfare of the Armed Forces of the United States", ~ (1995)
- Luttwak, Edward N, "Strategy: The Logic of War and Peace" (1987), Harvard College
- Metz, Steven, "Asymmetry and U.S. Military Strategy:Definition, Background, and Strategic Concepts" (2001), Strategic Studies Institute
- Paterson, Lawrence, "Steel and Ice: The U-Boat Battle in the Arctic and Black Sea, 1941-1945" (2016), Naval Institute Press
- The Joint Chief of Staffs, "Joint Strategy Review 1999" (1999), The Joint Chief of Staffs
- Williamson, Gordon, "U-boat Tactics in World War Ⅱ" (2015), Osprey Publishing
- Wright, Quincy, "A Study of War" (1942), The University of Chicago Press
- 한국군의 비대칭전략 개념과 접근 방책, "권태영", 한국전략문제연구소, ~ (2006)
- 김법헌, "북한의 비대칭 공세전략 확장과 한국의 대응전략: 잠수함발사탄도미사일(SLBM)위협을 중심으로", 한국동북아논총, 22(3), pp.161~183 (2017), 한국동북아학회
- 박성준, "비전통적 전쟁에 관한 연구 - 정치 ․ 사회적 비대칭 전략을 중심으로 -", 군사연구, (146), pp.259~284 (2018), 육군군사연구소[DOI]
- 박창희, "비대칭 전략에 관한 이론적 고찰", 국방정책연구, 24(1), pp.177~205 (2008), 한국국방연구원[DOI]
- 배달형, "4세대전쟁 및 비대칭 위협 관점의 사이버전 및 사이버심리전 발전방향", 전략연구, 22(65), pp.141~172 (2015), (사) 한국전략문제연구소
- 브루스 베넷, "비대칭적 전략과 한국의 군사기획", 전략연구 (1999)
- 임철균, "북한의 비대칭전략에 대한 대응방안 연구", 군사연구, (141), pp.335~368 (2016), 육군군사연구소[DOI]
- Arreguin-Toft, Ivan, "How the Weak Win Wars", International Security, 26(1) (2001)
- Cebrowski, Arthur K., "Network-Centric Warfare: It’s Origin and Future", U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings, 124 (1988)
- Elman, Miriam F., "The Foreign Policies of Small States: Challenging Neorealism in Its Own Backyard", British Journal of Political Science, 25(2), pp.175~ (1995)
- Owens, Willan A., "The Emerging System of Systems", U.S. Naval Institute Proceeding, 121(5) (1995)