군대조직과 민간조직의 리더십 비교 연구- 각 조직의 리더십역량을 중심으로 -
Comparative Study of Leadership in Military and Civilian Organization : Focusing on Leadership Competency
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to identify the commonalities and differences between the leadership of the military and private organizations through a comparison of leadership competency. According to the research results through the comparison of leadership competencies, it can be seen that the leadership competencies of military and private organizations have very similar structures and contents. Thirteen competencies such as teamwork, performance creation, change innovation, work expertise, vision presentation, situation judgment and decision-making, challenge, empowerment, developing subordinate, future insight, creativity, communication, and problem solving were found to be common. This supports the argument that leadership competency can be used in common in any organization and in any job, as argued by Spence & Spencer (1998), a researcher of leadership competency. However, as shown in terms of competencies, there is something that shows the characteristics of the military, which is related to battlefield leadership, and one of the big differences between military leadership and civilian leadership is related to the battlefield. Businesses and administrative organizations have emergencies, but many demonstrate leadership in peacetime situations, whereas military organizations show leadership in wartime as well as peacetime. In the exhibition, leadership is demonstrated in an environment that is very different from the usual situation. It is leadership in combat situations that are at the risk of life and death and immediate physical danger. This is the crucial difference between military leadership and general private organization leadership.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to identify the commonalities and differences between the leadership of the military and private organizations through a comparison of leadership competency. According to the research results through the comparison of leadership competencies, it can be seen that the leadership competencies of military and private organizations have very similar structures and contents. Thirteen competencies such as teamwork, performance creation, change innovation, work expertise, vision presentation, situation judgment and decision-making, challenge, empowerment, developing subordinate, future insight, creativity, communication, and problem solving were found to be common. This supports the argument that leadership competency can be used in common in any organization and in any job, as argued by Spence & Spencer (1998), a researcher of leadership competency. However, as shown in terms of competencies, there is something that shows the characteristics of the military, which is related to battlefield leadership, and one of the big differences between military leadership and civilian leadership is related to the battlefield. Businesses and administrative organizations have emergencies, but many demonstrate leadership in peacetime situations, whereas military organizations show leadership in wartime as well as peacetime. In the exhibition, leadership is demonstrated in an environment that is very different from the usual situation. It is leadership in combat situations that are at the risk of life and death and immediate physical danger. This is the crucial difference between military leadership and general private organization leadership.
참고문헌 (11)
- 민진, "한국의 군사조직" (2017), 대영문화사
- 최병순, "군 리더십" (2016), 북코리아
- Charan, "리더십 파이프라인" (2011), 미래의창
- MaClelland, D.C., "Improving officer selection for the foreign service" (1972), McBer
- 전기석, "조직 구성원이 인식하는 카리스마적 리더십행동 및 특성에 관한 탐색연구", 리더십연구, 10(2), pp.113~143 (2019), 리더십학회
- 탁진국, "거래적 및 변혁적 리더십의 효과: 일선 소대장을 중심으로", 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 16(2) (2003), 한국산업및조직심리학회
- Spencer, M., "핵심역량 모델의 개발과 활용" (1998), PSI 컨설팅
- Elo, S., "The qualitative content analysis process", Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62 (2007)
- Kaiser, "Differences in managerial jobs at the bottom, middle, and top: A review of empirical research", The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 14 (2011)
- Katz. R. I., "Skills of an effective administrator", Harvard Business Review (1955)
- "Chiefexecutive" (2016)[URL]
