본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

공급사슬 적응성의 선행 및 후행 요인과 매개효과에 관한 연구

The Antecedent, Consequences, and Mediating Effect of Supply Chain Adaptability

허대식|민순홍|이성현|양기훈
한국로지스틱스학회 (Korea Logistics Society)|2024.02|로지스틱스연구 (Korean Journal of Logistics)|제32권 제1호|pp. 57-77|DOI 10.15735/kls.2024.32.1.005

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Firm performanceDynamic capabilitiesOrganizational learning cultureSupply chain adaptabilitySPP Framework
주제분류경영학

초록

To maintain a competitive advantage in supply chain management, companies require the capability of adapting to major changes occurring in supply chains, which involves recognizing market changes and the ability to adapt to them. Despite the emphasis on the importance of supply chain adaptability in real corporate cases and prior research, there is a relative shortage of studies on the antecedents and effects of supply chain adaptability. Therefore, this study proposes and tests a theory of supply chain adaptability based on the Strategy-Positional Advantage-Performance framework (SPP framework) and the concept of dynamic capabilities. Specifically, an organizational learning culture is proposed as an antecedent of supply chain adaptability, and the mediating effect of supply chain adaptability in the relationship between organizational learning culture and firm performance is examined. The empirical test was performed using survey responses from 209 manufacturing companies in 15 countries, including North America, Europe, and Asia. This study is significant in that it (1) conceptualized and empirically confirmed that supply chain adaptability is a multidimensional construct, (2) recognized that organizational learning culture can function as an antecedent of supply chain adaptability, and (3) theorized and confirmed that supply chain adaptability mediates the organizational learning culture and firm performance based on the SPP framework.

Abstract

To maintain a competitive advantage in supply chain management, companies require the capability of adapting to major changes occurring in supply chains, which involves recognizing market changes and the ability to adapt to them. Despite the emphasis on the importance of supply chain adaptability in real corporate cases and prior research, there is a relative shortage of studies on the antecedents and effects of supply chain adaptability. Therefore, this study proposes and tests a theory of supply chain adaptability based on the Strategy-Positional Advantage-Performance framework (SPP framework) and the concept of dynamic capabilities. Specifically, an organizational learning culture is proposed as an antecedent of supply chain adaptability, and the mediating effect of supply chain adaptability in the relationship between organizational learning culture and firm performance is examined. The empirical test was performed using survey responses from 209 manufacturing companies in 15 countries, including North America, Europe, and Asia. This study is significant in that it (1) conceptualized and empirically confirmed that supply chain adaptability is a multidimensional construct, (2) recognized that organizational learning culture can function as an antecedent of supply chain adaptability, and (3) theorized and confirmed that supply chain adaptability mediates the organizational learning culture and firm performance based on the SPP framework.

참고문헌 (93)

  1. 남현정, "4 차 산업혁명에 따른 물류 산업 유형 구분과 대응 방안", 경영컨설팅연구, 18(3), pp.275~286 (2018)
  2. 민순홍, "기업의 생산전략이 기업의신제품 개발에 미치는 영향에 대한 실증적 연구", 로지스틱스연구, 27(1), pp.47~70 (2019)
  3. 박찬권, "공급사슬지향성과 공급사슬 가시성, SCM 성과 간의 관계에 대한 연구 : 반응적 공급사슬을 중심으로", 로지스틱스연구, 25(4), pp.1~20 (2017)
  4. 이인태, "공급사슬의 비전 및 목표공유가 공급사슬가시성 확보를 통한 공급사슬 성과에 미치는 영향", 로지스틱스연구, 25(1), pp.23~40 (2017)
  5. 홍의, "Internet of Things in Apparel Industry : A Case Study of OVS, Italian SpA Brand", 경영컨설팅연구, 19(1), pp.269~284 (2019)
  6. Agarwal, A., "Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain : An ANP-based approach", European journal of operational research, 173(1), pp.211~225 (2006)
  7. Alfalla-Luque, R., "Triple-A and competitive advantage in supply chains : Empirical research in developed countries", International Journal of Production Economics, 203, pp.48~61 (2018)
  8. Azadegan, A., "Benefiting from supplier operational innovativeness : the influence of supplier evaluations and absorptive capacity", Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(2), pp.49~64 (2011)
  9. Bagozzi, R. P., "On the evaluation of structural equation models", Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16, pp.74~94 (1988)
  10. Beheregarai Finger, A., "Anticipation of new technologies : supply chain antecedents and competitive performance", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(6), pp.807~828 (2014)
  11. Bentler, P. M., "Comparative fit indexes in structural models", Psychological bulletin, 107(2), pp.238~ (1990)
  12. Bollen, K. A., "Structural equations with latent variables (Vol. 210)" (1989), John Wiley & Sons
  13. Bordoloi, S. K., "Flexibility, adaptability, and efficiency in manufacturing systems", Production and Operations Management, 8(2), pp.133~150 (1999)
  14. Calantone, R. J., "Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance", Industrial marketing management, 31(6), pp.515~524 (2002)
  15. Carmines, E. G., "Analyzing models with unobserved variables", Social measurement: Current issues, 80 (1981)
  16. Chandler, G. N., "Founder competence, the environment, and venture performance", Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 18(3), pp.77~89 (1994)
  17. Choi, T., "Don’t let your supply chain control your business", Harvard Business Review, 89(12) (2011)
  18. Christopher, M., "“Supply Chain 2.0”: Managing supply chains in the era of turbulence", International journal of physical distribution &logistics management, 41(1), pp.63~82 (2011)
  19. Christopher, M., "An integrated model for the design of agile supply chains", International Journal of Physical Distribution &Logistics Management, 31(4), pp.235~246 (2001)
  20. Chung, H. F., "How does organizational learning matter in strategic business performance? The contingency role of guanxi networking", Journal of business research, 68(6), pp.1216~1224 (2015)
  21. Day, G. S., "The capabilities of market-driven organizations", Journal of marketing, 58(4), pp.37~52 (1994)
  22. Day, G. S., "Assessing advantage : a framework for diagnosing competitive superiority", Journal of marketing, 52(2), pp.1~20 (1988)
  23. Demeter, K., "The impact of lean practices on inventory turnover", International journal of production economics, 133(1), pp.154~163 (2011)
  24. Dickson, P. R., "The static and dynamic mechanics of competition : a comment on Hunt and Morgan’s comparative advantage theory", Journal of marketing, 60(4), pp.102~106 (1996)
  25. Dong, H., "Study and application of supplier performance evaluation system based on the triple-a supply chain", Applied Mechanics and Materials, 397, pp.2636~2640 (2013)
  26. Dubey, R., "Impact of agility, adaptability and alignment on humanitarian logistics performance : mediating effect of leadership", Global Business Review, 16(5), pp.812~831 (2015)
  27. Eckstein, D., "The performance impact of supply chain agility and supply chain adaptability : the moderating effect of product complexity", International Journal of Production Research, 53(10), pp.3028~3046 (2015)
  28. Egan, T. M., "The effects of organizational learning culture and job satisfaction on motivation to transfer learning and turnover intention", Human resource development quarterly, 15(3), pp.279~301 (2004)
  29. Eisenberg, A., "The interrelation between organizational learning culture and organizational citizenship behavior", Rural Environment, Education, Personality, 11, pp.11~12 (2018)
  30. Eisenhardt, K. M., "Dynamic capabilities: what are they?", Strategic management journal, 21(10‐11), pp.1105~1121 (2000)
  31. Ellinger, A. D., "The relationship between the learning organization concept and firms’ financial performance : An empirical assessment", Human resource development quarterly, 13(1), pp.5~22 (2002)
  32. Evenseth, L. L., "Building organizational resilience through organizational learning : A systematic review", Frontiers in Communication, 7, pp.837386~ (2022)
  33. Fan, X., "Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes", Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), pp.56~83 (1999)
  34. Feizabadi, J., "Synergistic effect of cooperation and coordination to enhance the firm’s supply chain adaptability and performance", Benchmarking : An International Journal, 29(1), pp.136~171 (2022)
  35. Feizabadi, J., "Benchmarking the triple-A supply chain : orchestrating agility, adaptability, and alignment", Benchmarking : An International Journal, 26(1), pp.271~295 (2019)
  36. Fornell, C., "Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics" (1981)
  37. Galbreath, J. T., "Determinants of firm success: a resource-based analysis", Doctor, pp.2004
  38. Galer, G., "The Learning Organization : How Planners CreateOrganizational Learning", Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 10(6), pp.5~12 (1992)
  39. Garvin, D. A., "Building a Learning Organization", Harvard Business Review, 71(4), pp.378~391 (1993)
  40. Hair, E., "Children’s school readiness in the ECLS-K : Predictions to academic, health, and social outcomes in first grade", Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21(4), pp.431~454 (2006)
  41. Hair, J. F., "Multivariate data analysis", pp.207~219 (1998)
  42. Hu, L. T., "Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives", Structural equation modeling, 6(1), pp.1~55 (1999)
  43. Huang, X., "Organizational structure and continuous improvement and learning : Moderating effects of cultural endorsement of participative leadership", Journal of International Business Studies, 42, pp.1103~1120 (2011)
  44. Huber, G. P., "Organizational learning : The contributing processes and the literatures", Organization science, 2(1), pp.88~115 (1991)
  45. Hung, R. Y. Y., "Dynamic capability : Impact of process alignment and organizational learning culture on performance", Journal of world business, 45(3), pp.285~294 (2010)
  46. Hunt, S. D., "The comparative advantage theory of competition", Journal of marketing, 59(2), pp.1~15 (1995)
  47. Hurley, R. F., "Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning : an integration and empirical examination", Journal of marketing, 62(3), pp.42~54 (1998)
  48. Koufteros, X. A., ""Black-box"and"gray-box"supplier integration in product development : Antecedents, consequences and the moderating role of firm size", Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), pp.847~870 (2007)
  49. Lau, A. K., "Effects of supplier and customer integration on product innovation and performance : Empirical evidence in Hong Kong manufacturers", Journal of product innovation management, 27(5), pp.761~777 (2010)
  50. Lee, H. L., "The triple-A supply chain", Harvard business review, 82(10), pp.102~113 (2004)
  51. Lee, H. L., "The new AAA supply chain", Management and Business Review, 1(1) (2021)
  52. Levitt, B., "Organizational learning", Annual review of sociology, 14(1), pp.319~338 (1988)
  53. Li, C. R., "The contingent value of exploratory and exploitative learning for new product development performance", Industrial Marketing Management, 39(7), pp.1186~1197 (2010)
  54. Lynch, J., "An examination of the role for Business Orientation in an uncertain business environment", International Journal of Production Economics, 137(1), pp.145~156 (2012)
  55. March, J. G., "A behavioral theory of the firm" (1963), Prentice-Hall
  56. Marin-Garcia, J. A., "A Triple-A supply chain measurement model : validation and analysis", International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 48(10), pp.976~994 (2018)
  57. Marsick, V. J., "Demonstrating the value of an organization’s learning culture : the dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire", Advances in developing human resources, 5(2), pp.132~151 (2003)
  58. McIver, J., "Unidimensional scaling (Vol. 24)" (1981), sage
  59. Min, S., "Developing and measuring supply chain management concepts", Journal of business logistics, 25(1), pp.63~99 (2004)
  60. Min, S., "Defining supply chain management : in the past, present, and future", Journal of business logistics, 40(1), pp.44~55 (2019)
  61. Moss, S., "Reliability and validity of the PAS-ADD Checklist for detecting psychiatric disorders in adults with intellectual disability", Journal of intellectual disability research, 42(2), pp.173~183 (1998)
  62. Mueller, V., "Success patterns of exploratory and exploitative innovation : A meta-analysis of the influence of institutional factors", Journal of Management, 39(6), pp.1606~1636 (2013)
  63. Pantouvakis, A., "Agility, organisational learning culture and relationship quality in the port sector", Total Quality Management &Business Excellence, 28(3-4), pp.366~378 (2017)
  64. Phadnis, S., "Configuring supply chain dyads for regulatory disruptions : A behavioral study of scenarios", Production and Operations Management, 30(4), pp.1014~1033 (2021)
  65. Phadnis, S. S., "Scenario planning as a strategy process to foster supply chain adaptability: theoretical framework and longitudinal case", Futures & Foresight Science, 3(2), pp.e62~ (2021)
  66. Pine, J., "Beyond goods and services", Strategy & Leadership, 25(3), pp.10~18 (1997)
  67. Preacher, K. J., "Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models", Behavior research methods, 40(3), pp.879~891 (2008)
  68. Ray, G., "Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage : choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource-based view", Strategic management journal, 25(1), pp.23~37 (2004)
  69. Roth, K., "Implementing global strategy : Characteristics of global subsidiary mandates", Journal of International Business Studies, 23, pp.715~735 (1992)
  70. Schoenherr, T., "The roles of supply chain intelligence and adaptability in new product launch success", Decision Sciences, 46(5), pp.901~936 (2015)
  71. Sheel, A., "Effect of blockchain technology adoption on supply chain adaptability, agility, alignment and performance", Management Research Review, 42(12), pp.1353~1374 (2019)
  72. Sinkula, J. M., "A framework for market-based organizational learning : Linking values, knowledge, and behavior", Journal of the academy of Marketing Science, 25, pp.305~318 (1997)
  73. Smircich, L., "Organizations as shared meanings", Organizational symbolism, 55, pp.65~ (1983)
  74. Sorenson, O., "Interdependence and adaptability : organizational learning and the long-term effect of integration", Management Science, 49(4), pp.446~463 (2003)
  75. Stevenson, M., "Flexibility from a supply chain perspective : definition and review", International journal of operations & production management, 27(7), pp.685~713 (2007)
  76. Su, Z., "Exploratory learning and exploitative learning in different organizational structures", Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(4), pp.697~714 (2011)
  77. Tan, V., "Change management in times of economic uncertainty", Singapore Management Review, 27(1), pp.49~69 (2005)
  78. Teece, D. J., "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management", Strategic management journal, 18(7), pp.509~533 (1997)
  79. Tsang, E. W., "Organizational learning and the learning organization : a dichotomy between descriptive and prescriptive research", Human relations, 50(1), pp.73~89 (1997)
  80. Tuominen, M., "How does adaptability drive firm innovativeness?", Journal of Business research, 57(5), pp.495~506 (2004)
  81. Tuominen, M., "Market-driving versus market-driven : Divergent roles of market orientation in business relationships", Industrial marketing management, 33(3), pp.207~217 (2004)
  82. Uttal, B., "The corporate culture vultures", Fortune, 108(8), pp.66~72 (1983)
  83. Wang, Z., "Intellectual capital, supply chain learning, and adaptability : A comparative investigation in China and the United States", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(6), pp.2738~2753 (2022)
  84. Whitten, G. D., "Triple-A supply chain performance", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(1), pp.28~48 (2012)
  85. Widaman, K. F., "Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait-multimethod data", Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(1), pp.1~26 (1985)
  86. Yang, B., "Identifying valid and reliable measures for dimensions of a learning culture", Advances in developing human resources, 5(2), pp.152~162 (2003)
  87. Yang, L., "The impact of information sharing on supply chain adaptability and operational performance", The International Journal of Logistics Management, 33(2), pp.590~619 (2022)
  88. Yannopoulos, P., "Achieving fit between learning and market orientation : Implications for new product performance", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(4), pp.531~545 (2012)
  89. Yayla-Küllü, H. M., "Product line flexibility for agile and adaptable operations", Production and Operations Management, 30(3), pp.725~737 (2021)
  90. Zahra, S. A., "Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities : A review, model and research agenda", Journal of Management studies, 43(4), pp.917~955 (2006)
  91. Zhang, D., "A network economic model for supply chain versus supply chain competition", Omega, 34(3), pp.283~295 (2006)
  92. Zhao, X., "The impact of power and relationship commitment on the integration between manufacturers and customers in a supply chain", Journal of operations management, 26(3), pp.368~388 (2008)
  93. Zollo, M., "Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities", Organization science, 13(3), pp.339~351 (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

공급사슬 역량과 능력 그리고 기업성과 간의 관계: 공급사슬의 민첩성을 중심으로강성배한국지식경영학회 · 지식경영연구2012 · 제13권 제2호양면적 공급사슬관리 활동과 경쟁우위허문구경영경제연구소 · 아태비즈니스연구2020 · 제11권 제3호Supply Chain Agility: Achieving Robustness and Logistics Performance이창준, 하영규한국유통과학회 · 유통과학연구2024 · 제22권 제9호공급사슬 지향성, 민첩성 및 성과 간의 관계: 수도권 소재 중소 제조 기업을 대상으로김종영, 박종우, 조동혁한국기업경영학회 · 기업경영연구2015 · 제22권 제5호공급사슬 민첩성과 강건성은 회복탄력성의 구성요소인가?김우섭, 김진한한국기업경영학회 · 기업경영연구2025 · 제32권 제5호The Impact of SCM and e-SCM on Change Acceptance Capability, Information Sharing Capability, Partnership Management Capability and Business Performance김동일, 최수호대한산업경영학회 · 산업융합연구2022 · 제20권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)

국내 콜드체인 물류 산업경쟁력을 위한 운송상의 위험성 요인 평가김동진, 김태훈pp. 1-18Hub-and-Spoke 시스템 기반의 UAM 서비스 최적 네트워크 설계송병덕, 전보강, 정호영, 이학태, 황태성pp. 19-29국제전자상거래 공급망 구축 방안에 관한 사례 연구: 대외환경적 물류 불확실성을 고려하여김현호, 최동현pp. 31-42디지털피킹시스템의 동시 피킹 전략 기반 SKU 선별 및 구역 할당김광태, 장진명, 손동훈, 김화중pp. 43-55물류기업의 ESG 경영이 기업가치와 부도가능성에 미치는 영향임태건, 배진철, 이상윤, 민정웅pp. 79-90
원문 보기