‘유교 국가주의’와 문화권력, 그 속박과 해방

Abstract

In this paper, we looked at the process of creating ' Confucianism- nationalism' in Korea and Japan during the modern transition period. They have discovered the similarities and differences in the process of localizing Confucianism, a foreign ideology. This is interpreted in this thesis as "nationalization = acquisition of cultural power." Although Shin chae-ho and Ookawa Syumei had common ground in their logic of combining Ah(Self 我) and Biah(Others 非我), they differed in the content of global universal thought as a nation, a royal family issue and an extension of the national anthem. The first finding was that Shin Chae-ho and Okawa Shumei were common in embracing Western theories based on Confucian theory, and trying to create a progressive logic that differs from existing Confucianism.. Shin Chae-ho claimed that "Ah and Biah must continue their struggle for their own self in order to advance to unity." On the other hand, Ookawa Syumei argued that they can unite the world of Biah in the world of Ah. The logic was that it could be unified with Biah. He argued that the important concept for him was education and training, and that he should faithfully practice it. This perception led Shin Chae-ho to form a relativistic view and to argue that loyalty and patriotism should be transferred to the state, not to the monarchy. On the other hand, Ookawa Syumei established a royal family on the nation and incorporated emperorism into universalism as idealism based on Confucian.