요한계시록 11:3-13의 두 증인은 누구인가?
Who is the two witnesses in Rev 11:3-13?
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The account of the two witnesses in Rev 11:3-13 is one of the most problematic passages in the Apocalypse, and the identity and mission of these two prophets are issues that remain unresolved. In this article the main contemporary interpretations are presented and evaluated in three groups: literal, symbolical and eclectic. Serious objections are raised to each of these approaches. On the one hand, to understand the identity of two witnesses in Rev 11:3-13, this article has observed the characteristics of the two witnesses: two olive trees, two lampstands, and comparision of Moses and Elijah. On the other hand this study has considered the unity and coherence of the enlargement as a whole in determining the connections between chapter 11 and adjacent chapters. The result of the investigations is that the symbolic interpretation is proper rather than the other two approaches. That menas the two witness refer to neither paradigmatic Christians such as Moses or Elijah nor law and Gospel. The two witnesses stand for the whole church as witnessing to the world.
Abstract
The account of the two witnesses in Rev 11:3-13 is one of the most problematic passages in the Apocalypse, and the identity and mission of these two prophets are issues that remain unresolved. In this article the main contemporary interpretations are presented and evaluated in three groups: literal, symbolical and eclectic. Serious objections are raised to each of these approaches. On the one hand, to understand the identity of two witnesses in Rev 11:3-13, this article has observed the characteristics of the two witnesses: two olive trees, two lampstands, and comparision of Moses and Elijah. On the other hand this study has considered the unity and coherence of the enlargement as a whole in determining the connections between chapter 11 and adjacent chapters. The result of the investigations is that the symbolic interpretation is proper rather than the other two approaches. That menas the two witness refer to neither paradigmatic Christians such as Moses or Elijah nor law and Gospel. The two witnesses stand for the whole church as witnessing to the world.
참고문헌 (45)
- G. K. Beale, "The Book of Revelation", pp.141~144 (1999), Eerdmans
- Barbara W. Snyder, "Combat and Myth in the Apocalypse: The Liturgy of the Day of the Lord and the Dedication of the Heavenly Temple", 박사, pp.1991
- 이동수, "요한계시록의 구조에 대한 연구", 진리논단, 10, pp.95~96 (2005)
- Robert Mounce, "The Book of Revelation", pp.211~ (1998), William B. Eerdmans
- A. Krodel, "Revlation, Augsburg Commentary on the New Testament", pp.221~ (1989), Augsburg Publishing House
- Craig S. Keener, "Revelation, The NIV Application Commentary", pp.287~ (2000), Zondervan
- John T.Hinds, "Revelation", pp.152~ (1976), Gospel Adovocate Company
- R. H. Charles, "A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Revelation of St. John,Vol. 1", pp.281~ (1920), T&T Clark
- R. Leivestad, "Christ the Conqueror: The Idea of Conflict and Victory in the New Testament", pp.228~ (1954), S P C K
- 김추성, "요한계시록11:3-13의 두 증인", 신학정론, 28(1), pp.46~ (2010)
- Daniel K. K. Wong, "The Two Witnesses in Revelation 11", BS, 154, pp.346~347 (1997)
- Donald, G, "Barnhouse Revelation", pp.202~ (1971), Zondervan
- David Hocking, "The Coming World Leader", pp.182~183 (1988), Multnomah
- Robert L. Thomas, "Revelation 8-22: An Exegetical Commentary", pp.88~89 (1995), Moody
- H. Lindsey, "There’a New World Coming", pp.149~150 (1975), Bantam
- Clyde C. Cox, "Apocalyptic Commentary", pp.127~ (1959), Pathway
- J. A. Seiss, "The Apocalypse: A Series of Special Lectures on the Revelation of Jesus Christ", pp.242~268 (1966), Eerdmans
- G. H. Lang, "The Revelation of Jesus Christ", pp.185~ (1945), Oliphansts
- David H. Stern, "Jewish New Testament Commentary", pp.820~ (1992), Jewish New Testament Publications
- J. Munck, "Petrus und Paulus in der Offenbarung Johannes, Telogogiske Skrifter 1", pp.15~19 (1950), Rosenskilde og Bagger
- W. A. Spurgeon, "The Conquering Christ", pp.134~135 (1936), Scott
- Stephen A. Hunter, "Studies in the Book of Revelation", pp.157~ (1921), Pittsburgh Printing
- Kenneth Strand, "The Two Witnesses of Rev 11:3-12", AUSS, pp.134~ (1981)
- Ekkehardt Müller, "The Two Witnesses of Revelation 11", JATS, pp.30~ (2002)
- P. Prigent, "Commentary on the Apocalypse of St. John", pp.349~350 (2001), Mohr Siebeck
- Ekkehardt Müller, "The Two Witnesses of Revelation 11", JATS, 13(2), pp.33~34 (2002)
- G. E. Ladd, "A Commentary on the Revelation of John", pp.154~ (1972), Eerdmans
- 김태훈, "소예언서", pp.194~ (2009), 한국장로교출판사
- Ralph L. Smith, "Micha-Malachi", pp.204~ (1984), Word Books
- Kenneth A. Strand, "The Two Olive Trees of Zechariah 4 and Revelation 11", AUSS, 20, pp.257~ (1987)
- 이필찬, "내가 속히 오리라", pp.483~ (2006), 이레서원
- 심상길, "어린양 모티브를 통해서 읽는 요한계시록", pp.62~ (2012), 더북
- Brian K. Blount, "Revelation", pp.57~58 (2009), Kohn Knox Press
- 이달, "요한계시록", pp.87~, 한국장로교출판사
- 이필찬, "요한계시록 어떻게 읽을 것인가", pp.172~ (2000), 성서 유니온 선교회
- Andrew E. Steinmann, "The Tripartite Structure of the Sixth Seal, the Sithth Trumpet, and the Sixth Bowl of John’s Apocalypse (Rev 6:12- 7:17; 9:13-11:14;16:12-16", JETS, 35(1), pp.73~ (1992)
- 신동욱, "요한계시록의 제자도", 신약논단, 19(1), pp.241~279 (2012), 한국신약학회[DOI]
- 송영목, "요한계시록에 나타난 혼합주의와 한국 교회: 그레코-로마 세계의 문화인류학적 모델을 중심으로", 신약연구, 8(1), pp.467~495 (2009), 한국복음주의신약학회
- 송영목, "요한계시록 6장의 인 재앙과 요세푸스의‘유대전쟁사’의 간본문적 해석", 신약연구, 5(1), pp.169~ (2006)
- M. E. Boring, "Revelation:Interpretation - A Bible Commentary for Teaching and Preaching", pp.122~ (1970), John Knox Press
- Jürgen Roloff, "The Revelation of John, In A Continental Commentary", pp.122~ (1993), Fortress Press
- Kenneth A. Strand, "The ‘Spotlight-On-Last-Events’Sections in the Book of Revealation", pp.208~209
- Richard C. Lenski, "The Interpretation of St. John’s Revelation", pp.326~ (1963), Augsburg
- 홍창표, "요한계시록 해설", pp.109~ (1999), 크리스천북
- 김상훈, "요한계시록의 구조에 대한 새 제안", 신학지남, (305), pp.49~50 (2010)