누가-행전에 나타난 원시기독교 선지자운동
The Prophetic Movement of Early Christianity Depicted in Luke-Acts
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is an intertextual approach to the prophetic movement described in Luke-Acts. It divides the movement into three successive stages: first, the period of the law and the prophets proclaimed until John the Baptist (Luke 16:16);second, the period from the baptism of John until the day of Jesus’s ascension (Acts 1:21); third, the period from the day of Pentecost to the time for the restoration of All (Acts 3:21). This suggestion is an innovative conflation of the Lukan theme of prophet with Hans Conzelmann’s concept of salvation history which consists of three periods, the eras of Israel, of Jesus, and of the Church. This paper argues that Jesus throughout the Lukan Gospel and Acts represents the Son of God and Messiah who repeats the fate of Israelite prophets, such as Moses, Elijah, Elisha, and John the Baptist,but still preserves his role as the Son of Man to be the eschatological judge after the restoration of All. Due to the Son’s redemptive death, He is able to be taken up into heaven and His followers and apostles become unprecedentedly radical prophets who possess the Holy Spirit and thereby invincible mouth and wisdom. They all participate in the eschatological role of Jesus as the sons of the Most High, and their days signify the last days in which all nations are required to listen to them in whatever they tell those nations. This definition of early Christian prophetic movement stands against J. Severino Croatto (2005) who argues that Jesus in Luke is a prophet like Elijah, but in Acts the prophet-teacher like Moses foretold in Deut 18:15,18. The former, according to Croatto, is “a historical Jesus prophet”while the latter “a paschal Jesus Messiah.”For Croatto, the symbolic transcendent and eschatological Messiah-Savior in Acts replaces the historical messengerprophet. Luke Timothy Johnson (2011), however, effectively argues that Jesus in Luke does not deviate from Jesus in Acts because Luke-Acts are the two volumes of a single literary composition, and that the prophetic spirit in Luke is not lost but radically reinforced in Acts.
Abstract
This study is an intertextual approach to the prophetic movement described in Luke-Acts. It divides the movement into three successive stages: first, the period of the law and the prophets proclaimed until John the Baptist (Luke 16:16);second, the period from the baptism of John until the day of Jesus’s ascension (Acts 1:21); third, the period from the day of Pentecost to the time for the restoration of All (Acts 3:21). This suggestion is an innovative conflation of the Lukan theme of prophet with Hans Conzelmann’s concept of salvation history which consists of three periods, the eras of Israel, of Jesus, and of the Church. This paper argues that Jesus throughout the Lukan Gospel and Acts represents the Son of God and Messiah who repeats the fate of Israelite prophets, such as Moses, Elijah, Elisha, and John the Baptist,but still preserves his role as the Son of Man to be the eschatological judge after the restoration of All. Due to the Son’s redemptive death, He is able to be taken up into heaven and His followers and apostles become unprecedentedly radical prophets who possess the Holy Spirit and thereby invincible mouth and wisdom. They all participate in the eschatological role of Jesus as the sons of the Most High, and their days signify the last days in which all nations are required to listen to them in whatever they tell those nations. This definition of early Christian prophetic movement stands against J. Severino Croatto (2005) who argues that Jesus in Luke is a prophet like Elijah, but in Acts the prophet-teacher like Moses foretold in Deut 18:15,18. The former, according to Croatto, is “a historical Jesus prophet”while the latter “a paschal Jesus Messiah.”For Croatto, the symbolic transcendent and eschatological Messiah-Savior in Acts replaces the historical messengerprophet. Luke Timothy Johnson (2011), however, effectively argues that Jesus in Luke does not deviate from Jesus in Acts because Luke-Acts are the two volumes of a single literary composition, and that the prophetic spirit in Luke is not lost but radically reinforced in Acts.
참고문헌 (45)
- Henry Joel Cadbury, "The Making of Luke-Acts" (1927), Macmillan
- Burton L. Mack, "Mark and Christian Origins : A Myth of Innocence", pp.60~ (1988), Fortress Press
- James M. Robinson, "LOGOI SOPHŌN: On the Gattung of Q, In Zeit und Geschichte", pp.77~96 (1964), Mohr
- John S. Kloppenborg, "The Formation of Q", pp.27~33 (1987), Fortress Press
- James M. Robinson, "Jesus as Sophos and Sophia, In Aspects of Wisdom in Judaism and Early Christianity", pp.1~15 (1975), University Press
- Hans Conzelmann, "Der Mitte de Zeit" (1953), Mohr Siebeck
- J. Severino Croatto, "Jesus, Prophet like Elijah, and Prophet-Teacher like Moses in Luke-Acts", JBL, 124(3), pp.451~465 (2005)
- Wayne A. Meeks, "Moses as God and King, In Religions in Antiquity", pp.354~371 (1968), Brill
- "The Prophet-King: Moses Tradition and the Johannine Christology" (1967), E. J. Brill
- Bernard S. Jackson, "The Prophet and the Law in Early Judaism and the New Testament", Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature, 4, pp.123~166 (1992)
- Luke Timothy Johnson, "Prophetic Church: The Challenge of Luke-Acts to Contemporary Christians", pp.2~5 (2011), William B. Eerdmans
- C. F. Evans, "The Central Section of St. Luke’s Gospel, In Studies in the Gospels: Essays in Memory of R. H. Lightfoot", pp.37~53 (1955), Blackwell
- J. A. Sanders, "The Ethic of Election in Luke’s Great Banquet Parable, In Essays in Old Testament Ethics", pp.247~271 (1974), Ktav
- C. L. Blomberg, "Midrash, Chiasmus, and the Outline of Luke’s Central Section, In Gospel Perspectives III: Studies in Midrash and Historiography", pp.217~261 (1983), JSOT
- R. E. Brown, "Jesus and Elisha", Perspective, 12, pp.85~104 (1971)
- A. Wiener, "The Prophet Elijah in the Development of Judaism" (1978), Routledge & Kegan Paul
- M. M. Faierstein, "Why Do the Scribes Say that Elijah Must Come First?", JBL, 100, pp.75~86 (1981)
- Craig A. Evans, "Luke’s Use of the Elijah", Elisha Narratives and the Ethic of Election, 1987, pp.106, 75~83
- 이두희, "누가-행전에 나타난 수사적 서술 기법과 복음의 소통: ‘찬사(encomium), 비난(invective), 비교(comparison)’ 기법을 중심으로", 신약논단, 20(2), pp.303~338 (2013), 한국신약학회
- Thomas L. Brodie, "Towards Unraveling Luke’s Use of the Old Testament: Luke 7:11-17 as an Imitatio of 1 Kings 17:17-24", NTS, 32, pp.247~267 (1983)
- 문우일, "상호 텍스트성에서 미메시스 비평까지", 신약논단, 19(1), pp.313~351 (2012), 한국신약학회[DOI]
- Richard Hays, "Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul", pp.29~32 (1989), Yale University Press
- Dennis R. MacDonald, "Introduction, In Mimesis and Intertextuality in Antiquity and Christianity", pp.1~9 (2001), Trinity Press International
- Thomas L. Brodie, "Luke 7:36-50 as an Internalization of 2 Kings 4:1-37: A Study in Luke’s Use of Rhetorical Imitation", Bib, 64, pp.457~485 (1983)
- Thomas L. Brodie, "The Birthing of the New Testament: The Intertextual Development of the New Testament Writings", pp.96~ (2004), Sheffield Phoenix Press
- J. Jervell, "Luke and the People of God" (1972), Augusburg
- D. L. Tiede, "Prophecy and History in Luke-Acts" (1980), Fortress
- J. A. Sanders, "The Ethic of Election in Luke’s Great Banquet Parable, In Essays in Old Testament Ethics (J. Philip Hyatt, In Memoriam)", pp.247~271 (1974), Ktav
- D. P. Moessner, "Jesus and the ‘Wilderness Generation’: The Death of the Prophet like Moses according to Luke", SBL 1982 Seminar Papers (1982), Scholars Press
- D. P. Moessner, "Luke 9:1-50: Luke’s Preview of the Journey of the Prophet like Moses of Deuteronomy", JBL, 102, pp.575~605 (1983)
- 신현우, "세례 요한과 새 출애굽 - 마가복음 1:4-8 주해-", 신약논단, 20(1), pp.61~95 (2013), 한국신약학회
- François Bovon, "Luke 1", pp.376~ (2002), Fortress
- Fritzleo Lentzen-Deis, "Die Taufe Jesu nach den Synoptikern", pp.156~158 (1970), Joseph Knecht
- Rudolg Bultmann, "History of the Synoptic Tradition", pp.41~ (1976), Harper
- Charles H. Dodd, "The Parables of the Kingdom", pp.96~ (1961), Scribner’s Sons
- John D. Crossan, "In Parables: The Challenge of the Historical Jesus", pp.86~96 (1992), Polebridge Press
- Burton L. Mack, "A Myth of Innocence: Mark and Christian Origins", pp.168~, Fortress Press
- Robert H. Stein, "Luke, New American Commentary: An Exegetical and Theological Exposition of Holy Scripture 24", pp.492~ (1992), B & H Publishing Group
- 윤철원, "누가-행전의 내러티브 정치", 신약연구, 11(3), pp.643~678 (2012), 한국복음주의신약학회
- Charles K. Barrett, "Acts 1-14", pp.112~ (1994), T&T Clark
- Ernst Haenchen, "The Acts of the Apostles", pp.209~ (1971), Basil Blackwell
- Jean Calvin, "Commentary upon the Acts of the Apostles, vol. 1", pp.154~155 (1844), Calvin Translation Society
- 김동수, "방언의 기원-신약시대 이전에 방언이 있었는가?", 신약논단, 18(4), pp.1259~1285 (2011), 한국신약학회
- ssa, In TDNT 1, "glw", pp.1964, J. Behm
- Burton Mack, "The Christ and Jewish Wisdom, In Messiah", pp.192~221 (1992), Fortress Press
