본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

신약 편지 문예적 분석 최근 40년 평가와향후 연구를 위한 제언- 갈라디아서를 중심으로 -

Evaluation of Recent Forty-Year Literary Analysis of NT Letters and Suggestions for Further Studies - Focusing on Galatians -

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In this article I survey and evaluate the results of recent forty-year literary analysis of letters in NT and try to make some suggestions for further studies. For this aim, I focus on important scholars and their works about the Galatians, such as J.L. White(literary analyst[1971, 1972 etc.]), H.D. Betz(classical rhetorical analyst[1974/75 and 1979]), R.N. Longenecker(a kind of eclecticist between epistolography and rhetorical approach[1990])and D.F. Tolmie(new rhetorical analyst[2005]). Based on analysis of those works, I summarise their contributions and limitations as the following three points: First, recent forty-year literary analysis has developed by the later study complementing the limit of previous one. This fact shows this approach have internal and external interrelationship. Naturally, scholars can expect for the next step of literary analysis after Tolmie’s study. Second, this approach has proceeded in the basis of literary features of the Galatians as an ancient letter or any relevant work. This means scholars have tried not to lose their objective position in their studies. Of course, at the point that their result are different, studies’objectivity can be doubted. However, we may remind that such variety came from various methods for analysis. Thus,the main point is not their variety, but how we can find a proper method to analyse letters in NT. Third, literary analysis can be evaluated as a textcentred approach. All scholars mentioned above started from their Greek text and analysed it. Additionally, they have shown their interest in the composition and arrangement of the text. This tendency has improved the understanding of content of a letter and its main theme(s). However, last literary analysis passed by an important factor, i.e. to define a literary genre of letters in NT. Thus, in next step, the literary analysis should not only pay attention to define a literary genre of letters in NT, but also analyse letters by considering such literary generic features.

Abstract

In this article I survey and evaluate the results of recent forty-year literary analysis of letters in NT and try to make some suggestions for further studies. For this aim, I focus on important scholars and their works about the Galatians, such as J.L. White(literary analyst[1971, 1972 etc.]), H.D. Betz(classical rhetorical analyst[1974/75 and 1979]), R.N. Longenecker(a kind of eclecticist between epistolography and rhetorical approach[1990])and D.F. Tolmie(new rhetorical analyst[2005]). Based on analysis of those works, I summarise their contributions and limitations as the following three points: First, recent forty-year literary analysis has developed by the later study complementing the limit of previous one. This fact shows this approach have internal and external interrelationship. Naturally, scholars can expect for the next step of literary analysis after Tolmie’s study. Second, this approach has proceeded in the basis of literary features of the Galatians as an ancient letter or any relevant work. This means scholars have tried not to lose their objective position in their studies. Of course, at the point that their result are different, studies’objectivity can be doubted. However, we may remind that such variety came from various methods for analysis. Thus,the main point is not their variety, but how we can find a proper method to analyse letters in NT. Third, literary analysis can be evaluated as a textcentred approach. All scholars mentioned above started from their Greek text and analysed it. Additionally, they have shown their interest in the composition and arrangement of the text. This tendency has improved the understanding of content of a letter and its main theme(s). However, last literary analysis passed by an important factor, i.e. to define a literary genre of letters in NT. Thus, in next step, the literary analysis should not only pay attention to define a literary genre of letters in NT, but also analyse letters by considering such literary generic features.

참고문헌 (56)

  1. J. Kim, "Pastoral Letter in Early Christianity up to the Fifth Century C.E", 박사, pp.2012
  2. R.M. Grant, "성경 해석의 역사" (1994), 대한기독교서회
  3. T. Longman III, "문학적 성경 해석", pp.31~74 (2002), 솔로몬
  4. R.N. Soulen, "Handbook of Biblical Criticism [Louisville", pp.105~ (2001), Westminster John Knox Press
  5. 심상법, "신약 주해를 위한 신약 서론", pp.243~ (2005), 이레서원
  6. E.D. Hirsh, "Validity in Interpretation" (1967), Yale University Press
  7. J.L. White, "The Structural Analysis of Philemon: A Point of Departure in the Formal Analysis of the Pauline Letter", SBLSP, 1, pp.1~47 (1971)
  8. A. Deissmann, "Epistolary Literature, In Encyclopaedia Biblica: A Critical Dictionary of the Literary, Political, and Religious History, the Archaeology, Geography, and Natural History of the Bible (4 vols)", pp.1323~1329 (1901), Admans and Charles Black
  9. A. Grieve, "Bible Studies: Contributions Chiefly from Papyri and Inscriptions to the History of the Language, the Literature, and the Religion of Hellenistic Judaism and Primitive Christianity" (1909), T. & T. Clark
  10. "Licht vom Osten: Das Neue Testament und die neuentdeckten Texte der hellenistisch-romischen Welt" (1923), More Siebeck
  11. L.R.M. Strachan, "Light from the Ancient East: The New Testament Illustrated by Recently Discovered Texts of the Graeco-Roman World: New and Completely Revised Edition with Eighty-Five Illustrations from the Latest German Edition" (1965), Baker Book House
  12. H.G. Meecham, "Light from Ancient Letters: Private Correspondence in the Nonliterary Papyri of Oxyrhynchus of the First Four Centuries, and Its Bearing on New Testament Language and Thought" (1923), Wipf & Stock
  13. T.Y. Mullins, "Disclosure: A Literary Form in the New Testament", NovT, 7, pp.44~50 (1964)
  14. T.Y. Mullins, "Greeting as a New Testament Form", JBL, 87, pp.418~426 (1968)
  15. "Formulas in New Testament Epistles", JBL, 91, pp.380~390 (1972)
  16. J.L. White, "Introductory Formulae in the Body of the Pauline Letter", JBL, 90, pp.91~97 (1971)
  17. J.L. White, "The Form and Structure of the Official Petition: A Study in Greek Epistolography" (1972), Scholars Press
  18. J.L. White, "The Form and Function of the Body of the Greek Letter: A Study of the Letter-Body in the Non-Literary Papyri and in Paul the Apostle" (1972), Scholars Press
  19. J.L. White, "Apostolic Mission and Apostolic Message: Congruence in Paul’s Epistolary Rhetoric, Structure and Imagery, In Origins and Method: Toward a New Understanding of Judaism and Christianity: Essays in Honour of John C. Hurd", pp.157~160 (1993), JSOT
  20. J.L. White, "Light from Ancient Letters" (1986), Fortress Press
  21. J.L. White, "Epistolary Formulas and Clichés in Greek Papyrus Letters", SBLSP, 14, pp.303~304 (1978)
  22. J.L. White, "The Greek Documentary Letter Tradition Third Century B.C.E. to Third Century C.E", Semeia, 22, pp.98~ (1982)
  23. J.L. White, "Ancient Greek Letters, In Greco-Roman Literature and the New Testament: Selected Forms and Genres", pp.97~ (1988), Scholars Press
  24. M.L. Stirewalt, "Review", JBL, 93(3), pp.480~ (1974)
  25. J.J. Pilch, "Book Reviews and Short Notices", CBQ, 36(1), pp.146~ (1974)
  26. White, "Light from Ancient Letters, 3; “Saint Paul and the Apostolic Letter Tradition”", CBQ, 45 (1983)
  27. J.L. White, "Saint Paul and the Apostolic Tradition", CBQ, 45, pp.433~444 (1983)
  28. 이한수, "이방인들의 구원과 삶을 위해 바울 사도가 쓴 러브레터", pp.15~16 (2013), 솔로몬
  29. 김주한, "신약 성경 편지 서두 번역에 대한 제안", 신약연구, 11(4), pp.854~888 (2012), 한국복음주의신약학회
  30. H.D. Betz, "The Literary Composition and Function of Paul's Letter to the Galatians", NTS, 21, pp.353~379 (1974)
  31. H.D. Betz, "In Defense of the Spirit: Paul's Letter to the Galatians as a Document of Early Christian Apologetics, In Aspects of Religious Propaganda in Judaism and Early Christianity", pp.99~114 (1976), University of Notre Dame Press
  32. "Galatians: A Commentary on Paul's Letter to the Churches in Galatia" (1979), Fortress
  33. "갈라디아서" (1987), 한국 신학연구소
  34. M.D. Nanos, "The Galatians Debate: Contemporary Issues in Rhetorical and Historical Interpretation", pp.3~28 (2002), Hendrickson
  35. 박윤만, "Is Paul a Rhetorician? ‒ An evaluation based on Paul’s own biographical statements", 신약연구, 11(2), pp.1~31 (2012), 한국복음주의신약학회[DOI]
  36. G. Strecker, "History of New Testament Literature", pp.22~ (1997), Trinity Press International
  37. C.J. Classen, "Rhetorical Criticism of the New Testament", pp.15~16 (2002), Brill
  38. G.A. Kennedy, "New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism", pp.144~152 (1984), University of North Carolina Press
  39. J. Smit, "The Letter of Paul to the Galatians: A Deliberative Speech", NTS, 35, pp.1~26 (1989)
  40. S.K. Stowers, "Letter Writing in Greco-Roman Antiquity", pp.134~ (1986), Westminster
  41. D.E. Aune, "The New Testament in Its Literary Environment", pp.13~ (1987), Westminster
  42. A.J. Malherbe, "The Letters to the Thessalonians: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary", pp.97~ (2000), Doubleday
  43. M. Silva, "Betz and Bruce on Galatians", WTJ, 45, pp.378~ (1983)
  44. S.E. Porter, "Paul as Epistolographer and Rhetorician? Implications for the Study of the Paul of Acts, In Paul in Acts [Peabody", pp.98~125 (2001), Hendrickson
  45. S.E. Porter, "The Theoretical Justification for Application of Rhetorical Categories to Pauline Epistolary Literature", Rhetoric and the New Testament: Essays from the 1992 Heidelberg Conference, pp.100~122 (1993), Sheffield Academic Press
  46. E.E. Ellis, "The Sovereignty of God in Salvation: Biblical Essays", pp.94~ (2009), T. & T. Clark
  47. D.F. Watson, "A Reexamination of the Epistolary Analysis Underprining the Arguments for the Composite Nature of Philippians, In Early Christianity and Classical Culture: Comparative Studies in Honor of Abraham J. Malherbe", pp.157~177 (2003), E. J. Brill
  48. D.F. Watson, "Rhetorical Criticism of the New Testament, In Rhetorical Criticism of the Bible: A Comprehensive Bibliography with Notes on History and Method", pp.124~125 (1994), E. J. Brill
  49. S.E. Porter, "Exegesis of the Pauline Letters, including the Deutero-Pauline Letters, In Handbook to Exegesis of the New Testament", pp.503~553 (1997), E. J. Brill
  50. G.W. Hansen, "Abraham in Galatians: Epistolary and Rhetorical Contexts" (1989), Sheffield Academic Press
  51. D. Mitternacht, "A Structure of Persuasion in Galatians: Epistolary and Rhetorical Appeal in an Aural Setting", Exploring New Rhetorical Approaches to Galatians: Papers presented at an International Conference, pp.53~98 (2007), UFS
  52. R.N. Longenecker, "갈라디아서", pp.149~ (2003), 도서출판 솔로몬
  53. S.E. Porter, "Handbook to Exegesis of the New Testament", pp.585~ (1997), E. J. Brill
  54. R.N. Longenecker, "On the Form, Function and Authority of the New Testament Letters, In Scripture and Truth", pp.103~ (1983), Inter Varsity Press
  55. T.Y. Mullins, "Formulas in New Testament Epistles", JBL, 91, pp.380~390 (1972)
  56. D.F. Tolmie, "Persuading the Galatians: A Text-Centred Rhetorical Analysis of a Pauline Letter", Mohr Siebeck, 19, pp.24~27 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)