Reconsidering Mirror-Reading and Galatians
2
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of the essay is to examine the problems of mirror-reading, a method widely used for the purpose of reconstructing the historical context of Paul s letters, especially his letter to the Galatians. The thesis of the study is that the subjectivity inherent in this method can never disappear, despite scholarly effort at methodological control and scientific precision. After discussing the view of George Howard and the criticism on the method by G. Lyons, we will have a much closer look at the suggestions of J. M. G. Barclay, whose methodological proposal is widely acknowledged as the most successful in refining the process of mirrorreading and thereby making it workable.
Abstract
The purpose of the essay is to examine the problems of mirror-reading, a method widely used for the purpose of reconstructing the historical context of Paul s letters, especially his letter to the Galatians. The thesis of the study is that the subjectivity inherent in this method can never disappear, despite scholarly effort at methodological control and scientific precision. After discussing the view of George Howard and the criticism on the method by G. Lyons, we will have a much closer look at the suggestions of J. M. G. Barclay, whose methodological proposal is widely acknowledged as the most successful in refining the process of mirrorreading and thereby making it workable.
참고문헌 (34)
- John M. G. Barclay, "Mirror-Reading a Polemical Letter: Galatians as a Test Case", JSNT, 31 (1987)
- M. Nanos, "The Galatian Debate", pp.367~382 (2002), Hendrickson
- 이재현, "바울 서신서의 대적자들에 대한 분석 방법과 도구", 신약연구, 9(4), pp.763~804 (2010), 한국복음주의신약학회
- Franz Mußner, "Der Galaterbrief", pp.29~ (1974), Herder
- 권연경, "Eschatology in Galatians: Rethinking Paul’s Response to the Crisis in Galatia" (2004), Mohr Siebeck
- Paul Sampley, "Pauine Theology, Vol 1: Thessalonians, Philippians, Galatians and Philemon", pp.7~ (1991), Fortress
- Tyson, "Paul’s opponents in Galatia", Novum Testamentum, 10, pp.241~254 (1968)
- R. Longenecker, "Galatians", pp.lxxix~ (1991), Word
- T. Schreiner, "Galatians" (2010), Zondervan
- Alexander V. Prokhorov, "Taking the Jews out of the Equation: Galatians 6.12-17 as a Summon to Cease Evading Persecution", JSNT, 36, pp.172~188 (2013)
- "Crisis in Galatia" (1991), Cambridge University Press
- G. Lyons, "Pauline Autobiography: Towards a New Understanding" (1985), Scholars Press
- R. Hays, "both sensible and provocative", JBL, 12, pp.723~725 (1987)
- G. Howard, "Crisis in Galatia", ~
- Schmithals, "Paul and the Gnostics" (1972), Abingdon
- Schmithals, "Judaisten in Galatien?", ZNW, 74, pp.27~58 (1983)
- J. L. Martyn, "Galatians" (1997), Doubleday
- J. L. Martyn, "Theological Issues in the Letters of Paul" (1997), T. & T. Clark
- T. Martin, "Apostasy to Paganism: the Rhetorical Stasis of the Galatians Controversy", JBL, 114(3), pp.437~461 (1995)
- B. Kahl, "Galatians Re-imagined: Reading with the Eye of the Banquished" (2010), Fortress Press
- H. D. Betz, "Galatians: A Commentary on Paul’s Letter to the Churches in Galatia" (1979), Fortress Press
- B. Brinsmead, "Galatians – Dialogical Response to Opponents" (1982), Scholars Press
- Beverly Gaventa, "Galatians 1 and 2: Autobiography as Paradigm", Novum Testamentum, 28, pp.209~326 (1986)
- C. Joachim Classen, "The Galatian Debate", pp.95~113
- Moisés Silva, "Interpreting Galatians", ~
- N. K. Gupta, "Mirror-Reading Moral Issues in Paul’s Letters", JSNT, 34, pp.361~381 (2012)
- "Galatians – Dialogical Response to Opponents" (1982), Scholars Press
- "Truth", ~
- Susanna Schewe, "Die Galater zurückgewinnen; Paulinische Strategien in Galater 5 und 6", pp.49~59 (2005), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
- 권연경, "갈라디아의 선동자들은 율법준수를 요구하였는가?", 한국기독교신학논총, (56), pp.59~85 (2008), 한국기독교학회
- G. Kümmel, "Introduction to the New Testament", pp.195~196 (1975), SCM Press
- "Kümmel in Gnostics, 33, n. 49", ~
- "Obeying the Truth", 24~
- "Law-Observant Mission", 313~