해방직후 초창기 좌익 비평에 드러난 파시즘 극복 방향의 의미

Abstract

This paper aims to express implications of conquest course against Fascism presented the left commentators's critiques in the beginning of the liberation era. In this period, building nation was main topic. In this way, to explain Fascism discourse that mostly was displayed the left commentators is important, since that discourse presented about cautionary thing at building nation. In the beginning of the liberation era, the left commentators all regarded Fascism as conjunction of irrationality and national consciousness. But, the left commentators largely were divided into two groups at discoursing Fascism. Against Fascism, one commentators in first group emphasized internationalism and sought for solidarity with rationalism thought. In this way, counter being against Fascism which was supported by they was not substantialized into limited class or group. Thus that counter being could be various and differential. Namely, the way against Fascism that was sought by one commentators in first group could be interpreted as the line of supple segmentation, which Deleuze and Guattari explained as potentialities advanced to new life and the line of flight. This is positive implication of Fascism discourse that the left commentators's critiques showed. On the other hand, another commentators in second group criticized that Fascism had deleted class difference and then had oppressed the proletariat. In this way, they substantialized not nation but class. Thus the way against Fascism that was sought by another commentators in second group was led by the proletariat. After all, the way could be analyzed as the line of rigid segmentarity, which Deleuze and Guattari criticized into fixed and rigid and so without new life. This is negative implication of Fascism discourse that the left commentators's critiques showed.