The Crisis of Right to Informational Self-Determination versus the Crisis of Social Safety
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The control of information about oneself has emerged as the most sensitive issue both personally and nationally in a digital information society. In the digital information society, the right to informational self-determination is very likely to emerge as a fundamental constitutional right to be the cornerstone of maintaining a free democratic system. As a guardian of constitutional rights, the Korean Constitutional Court has maintained an appropriate balance between guaranteeing the right to informational self-determination and social safety. This paper examines how the Constitutional Court allows restrictions on the right to informational self-determination by analyzing the details of the four-step review of the principle of prohibition of excessive restriction on cases of violation of the right to informational self-determination. Even if some flaws are often found in the process of the argumentation, the Constitutional Court's credit for properly balancing the right to informational self-determination and social safety as public interest should not be underestimated.
Abstract
The control of information about oneself has emerged as the most sensitive issue both personally and nationally in a digital information society. In the digital information society, the right to informational self-determination is very likely to emerge as a fundamental constitutional right to be the cornerstone of maintaining a free democratic system. As a guardian of constitutional rights, the Korean Constitutional Court has maintained an appropriate balance between guaranteeing the right to informational self-determination and social safety. This paper examines how the Constitutional Court allows restrictions on the right to informational self-determination by analyzing the details of the four-step review of the principle of prohibition of excessive restriction on cases of violation of the right to informational self-determination. Even if some flaws are often found in the process of the argumentation, the Constitutional Court's credit for properly balancing the right to informational self-determination and social safety as public interest should not be underestimated.
참고문헌 (20)
- Barak, Aharon, "Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and Their Limitation" (2012), Cambridge University Press
- Cohen-Eliya, Moshe, "Proportionality and Constitutional Culture" (2013), Cambridge University Press
- 고수윤, "빅데이터 기술환경에서 개인정보자기결정권 침해판단방법론", 강원법학, 55, pp.403~456 (2018), 비교법학연구소[DOI]
- 전상현, "개인정보자기결정권의 헌법상 근거와 보호영역", 저스티스, 169, pp.5~36 (2018), 한국법학원[DOI]
- 정한신, "개인정보자기결정권에 관한 헌법재판소 결정의 비판적 검토", 법학연구, 56(4), pp.1~31 (2015), 법학연구소
- 강달천, "개인정보자기결정권 보호의 한계의 관점에서 본 「개인정보보호법」 개정의 문제점", 중앙법학, 22(3), pp.7~50 (2020), 중앙법학회[DOI]
- 이동규, "A Comparison of Policies on Opening and Utilization of Open Government Data: Key Discussions on the Disaster & Safety, Public Administration, Social Welfare, Industry & Employment Area Rate in South Korea", Journal of Safety and Crisis Management, 10(3), pp.23~33 (2020), (사)위기관리이론과실천[DOI]
- 이필재, "개인정보보호법과 관련 법률의 체계문제", Crisisonomy, 10(1), pp.81~104 (2014), (사)위기관리이론과실천
- Stone Sweet, Alec, "Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism", Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 47, pp.72~164 (2008)
- Stone Sweet, Alec, "Proportionality Balancing and Constitutional Governance: A Comparative and Global Approach" (2019), Oxford University Press
- Urbina, Francisco J., "A Critique of Proportionality and Balancing" (2017), Cambridge University Press
- 류성진, "코로나19 방역조치와 기본권 제한 법제의 정당성", 법학연구, 29(3), pp.113~138 (2021), 법학연구소
- "Constitutional Court Decisions. 33-1, 638. 2021. CC 2021. 06. 24. 2018Hun-Ka2", ~
- "Constitutional Court Decisions. 33-1, 650. 2021. CC 2021. 06. 24. 2017Hun-Ba479", ~
- "Constitutional Court Decisions. 31-2, 340. 2019. CC 2019. 09. 26. 2017Hun-Ma1209", ~
- "Constitutional Court Decisions. 30-1, 564. 2018. CC 2018. 06. 28. 2012Hun-Ma191", ~
- "Constitutional Court Decisions. 28-1, 244. 2016. CC 2016. 05. 16, 2014Hun-Ba68", ~
- "Constitutional Court Decisions. 28-1, 540. 2016. CC 2016. 03. 31. 2015Hun-Ma688", ~
- "Constitutional Court Decisions. 27-2, 370. 2015. CC 2015. 07. 30. 2014Hun-Ma340"
- "Constitutional Court Decisions. 17-1, 668. 2005. CC 2005. 05. 26. 99Hun-Ma513", ~