본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

개인정보 보호와 다른 헌법적 가치의 조화

Harmonization between Personal Information Protection and the Other Constitutional Values

0

조회

0

다운로드

32

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Concerning personal information protection, in the past, the direction of the policy and practices in market have focused on the utilization of personal information. However recently, with the enforcement of the Personal Information Protection Act in Korea, the trend of the protection of personal information from the EU is emerging. Especially the concept of a right to be forgotten made in the EU is a representative symbol which shows this direction of the protection of personal information. However, in Korean constitutional jurisprudence, a right to be forgotten is not a new one. Because, in the context of its content, a right to self-determination on personal information in Korean constitutional jurisprudence can already include a right to be forgotten. So the substantial meaning of a right to be forgotten is being understood that a right to be forgotten is a kind of rhetoric which can be a motivative chance to transfer from the policy of the utilization of personal information to the policy of the protection of personal information. Therefore, to ensure the practical meaning of a right to be forgotten, it is important to maintain a harmony between the utilization of personal information and the protection of personal information. Based on this stance, this purpose of this study aims to present a direction and abstract standard to make a harmony between personal information protection and the other constitutional values. In this study, to present a direction and abstract standard to make a harmony between personal information protection and the other constitutional values, the following factors was considered. First, consideration of discrimination or differentiation in kinds of personal information, for example, sensitive information, personally identified information, personally identifiable information, etc. is necessary. Second, consideration of discrimination or differentiation in kinds of other constitutional values, for example, freedom of expression, right to know, freedom of business, which conflict with personal information protection, is necessary. Based on the two factors, this study has proposed a direction and abstract standard to make a harmony between personal information protection and the other constitutional values.

Abstract

Concerning personal information protection, in the past, the direction of the policy and practices in market have focused on the utilization of personal information. However recently, with the enforcement of the Personal Information Protection Act in Korea, the trend of the protection of personal information from the EU is emerging. Especially the concept of a right to be forgotten made in the EU is a representative symbol which shows this direction of the protection of personal information. However, in Korean constitutional jurisprudence, a right to be forgotten is not a new one. Because, in the context of its content, a right to self-determination on personal information in Korean constitutional jurisprudence can already include a right to be forgotten. So the substantial meaning of a right to be forgotten is being understood that a right to be forgotten is a kind of rhetoric which can be a motivative chance to transfer from the policy of the utilization of personal information to the policy of the protection of personal information. Therefore, to ensure the practical meaning of a right to be forgotten, it is important to maintain a harmony between the utilization of personal information and the protection of personal information. Based on this stance, this purpose of this study aims to present a direction and abstract standard to make a harmony between personal information protection and the other constitutional values. In this study, to present a direction and abstract standard to make a harmony between personal information protection and the other constitutional values, the following factors was considered. First, consideration of discrimination or differentiation in kinds of personal information, for example, sensitive information, personally identified information, personally identifiable information, etc. is necessary. Second, consideration of discrimination or differentiation in kinds of other constitutional values, for example, freedom of expression, right to know, freedom of business, which conflict with personal information protection, is necessary. Based on the two factors, this study has proposed a direction and abstract standard to make a harmony between personal information protection and the other constitutional values.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 김주영, "개인정보 보호법의 이해 - 이론·판례와 해설" (2012), 법문사
  2. 빅토어 마이어 쇤베르거, "잊혀질 권리" (2011), 지식의 날개
  3. 이기혁, "알기 쉬운 개인정보보호의 이해와 활용" (2011), 인포더북스
  4. 이민영, "개인정보법제론, 개정증보판" (2007), jinhan M&B
  5. 권건보, "방송의 자유와 방송사업자의 개인정보 보호", 공법학연구, 11(2), pp.33~62 (2010), 한국비교공법학회
  6. 김일환, "개인정보의 보호와 이용법제의 분석을 위한 헌법상 고찰", 헌법학연구, 17(2), pp.353~389 (2011), 한국헌법학회
  7. 김재광, "개인정보보호법에 관한 새로운 법적 문제", 강원법학, 36, pp.95~120 (2012), 비교법학연구소[DOI]
  8. 문재완, "프라이버시 보호를 목적으로 하는 인터넷 규제의 의의와 한계 -‘잊혀질 권리’ 논의를 중심으로-", 언론과 법, 10(2), pp.1~37 (2011), (사)한국언론법학회
  9. 민윤영, "인터넷 상에서 잊혀질 권리와 「개인정보보호법」에 대한 비교법적 고찰", 고려법학, (63), pp.287~316 (2011), 법학연구원
  10. 박경신, "사생활의 비밀의 절차적 보호규범으로서의 개인정보보호법리 ― 개인정보보호법 및 위치정보보호법의 해석 및 적용의 헌법적 한계 ―", 공법연구, 40(1), pp.129~162 (2011), 한국공법학회
  11. 손형섭, "개인정보 보호법의 특징과 앞으로의 방향 ― 업계의 반응에 대한 몇 가지 대안을 중심으로 ―", 언론과 법, 11(1), pp.93~123 (2012), (사)한국언론법학회[DOI]
  12. 이승길, "정보화 사회에서의 개인정보권의침해와 그 구제", 중앙법학, 11(1), pp.51~83 (2009), 중앙법학회
  13. 이재진, "인터넷상의 지속적 기사 유통으로 인한 피해의 법적 쟁점:'잊혀질 권리' 인정의 필요성에 대한 탐색적 연구", 한국방송학보, 22(3), pp.172~212 (2008), 한국방송학회
  14. 임규철, "교원정보 실명공개의 위법성 유무", 공법학연구, 11(3), pp.347~369 (2010), 한국비교공법학회
  15. 임규철, "개인정보의 보호범위", 한독법학, (17) (2012), 한독법률학회
  16. 임규철, "국내외 개인정보 보호법제 현황 및 쟁점", 언론중재, (124) (2012)
  17. 정준현, "개인정보의 이전형태에 따른 “정보통신망법” 등의 적용과 한계에 관한 검토", 법학논총, 36(1), pp.41~66 (2012), 법학연구소
  18. 정혜영, "개인정보보호법의 내용과 체계에 관한 분석", 공법학연구, 12(4), pp.407~435 (2011), 한국비교공법학회
  19. 지성우, "기본권 이론적 관점에서의 ‘잊혀질 권리(Right to be forgotten)’에 대한 시론적 고찰", 언론중재, (119) (2011)
  20. 최경진, "잊혀질 권리-개인정보 관점에서", 정보법학, 16(2), pp.97~120 (2012), 한국정보법학회
  21. 허순철, "인터넷 검색과 개인정보자기결정권*", 공법학연구, 10(2), pp.157~186 (2009), 한국비교공법학회
  22. 홍명신, "정보의 웰다잉을 향한 시도 - ‘잊혀질 권리’를 둘러싼 국제동향", 언론중재, (119) (2011)
  23. 황성기, "인터넷 실명제에 관한 헌법학적 연구", 법학논총, 25(1), pp.9~40 (2008), 법학연구소
  24. 행정안전부, "개인정보 보호법령 및 지침·고시 해설", ~ (2011)
  25. "Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation)", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)