Comparative Analysis of the Deliberative Effects of Face-to-Face and Online Public Deliberation: Focusing on the Cases of Public Deliberation on Gyeonggi Provincial Government Policies in 2019 and 2020
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study seeks to provide empirical evidence for its usability by comparing and analyzing the deliberative effects of online public deliberation, which is growing as a new type of public deliberation, with the deliberative effects of traditional face-to-face public deliberation. In this study, the 2019 Gyeonggi provincial government policy face-to-face public deliberation and the 2020 Gyeonggi provincial government policy online public deliberation, which were conducted with the same organizer, host, and agenda, were analyzed. As a result of the analysis, online public deliberation showed similar deliberative effects to face-to-face public deliberation in terms of both individual and collective rationality. In particular, it showed high deliberative effects in terms of personal rationality. However, when limited to deliberative discussions, face-to-face discussions were still more effective than online discussions. The results of this analysis suggest that the use of online public deliberation can be actively considered in cases where expanding consensus on major policies and laying the foundation for consensus formation are needed, and that face-to-face public deliberation would be preferable in matters that require collective decision-making through in-depth deliberation.
Abstract
This study seeks to provide empirical evidence for its usability by comparing and analyzing the deliberative effects of online public deliberation, which is growing as a new type of public deliberation, with the deliberative effects of traditional face-to-face public deliberation. In this study, the 2019 Gyeonggi provincial government policy face-to-face public deliberation and the 2020 Gyeonggi provincial government policy online public deliberation, which were conducted with the same organizer, host, and agenda, were analyzed. As a result of the analysis, online public deliberation showed similar deliberative effects to face-to-face public deliberation in terms of both individual and collective rationality. In particular, it showed high deliberative effects in terms of personal rationality. However, when limited to deliberative discussions, face-to-face discussions were still more effective than online discussions. The results of this analysis suggest that the use of online public deliberation can be actively considered in cases where expanding consensus on major policies and laying the foundation for consensus formation are needed, and that face-to-face public deliberation would be preferable in matters that require collective decision-making through in-depth deliberation.
참고문헌 (29)
- Andersen, Vibeke Normann, "How Deliberation Makes Better Citizens : The Danish Deliberative Poll on the Euro", European Journal of Political Research, 46(4), pp.531~556 (2007)
- Bae, Young, "A Study on the Public Sphere and Promotion of Public Interest in Cyberspace", Cyber Communication Journal, 17(1), pp.47~76 (2006)
- Baek, Young Min, "Online Versus Face-to-Face Deliberation: Who? Why? What? With What Effects?", New Media & Society, 14(3), pp.363~383 (2011)
- Benhabib, S., "Democracy and Difference" (1996), Princeton University Press
- Bravo, B., "A Model for the Analysis of Online Citizen Deliberation : Barcelona Case Study", International Journal of Communication, 13, pp.5671~5695 (2019)
- Coleman, S., "Under Construction : The Field of Online Deliberation Research", Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 9(1), pp.1~15 (2012)
- Dryzek, John S., "Deliberative Democracy and Beyond-Liberals, Critics, Contestation" (2000), Oxford University Press
- Elster, J., "Deliberative Democracy" (1998), Cambridge University Press
- Elstub, S., "Deliberative Democracy: Issues and Cases" (2014), Edinburg University Press
- Eun, Jae-Ho, "Theory and Practice of Public Deliberation" (2021), Parkyoungsa
- Fishkin, J., "Online Deliberation: Design, Research, and Practice" (2009), CSLI Publications
- Fung, Archon, "Deepening Democracy : Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance", Politics & Society, 29(1), pp.5~41 (2001)
- Gyeonggi-do, "2019 Gyeonggi Provincial Government Policy Public Deliberation White Paper", ~ (2019)
- Gyeonggi-do, "2020 Gyeonggi Provincial Government Policy Public Deliberation White Paper", ~ (2020)
- Hartz-Karp, J., "The Unfulfilled Promise of Online Deliberation", Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 10(1), pp.1~5 (2014)
- Hauben, M., "Netizens", pp.1997, Wiley
- Iyengar, S., "Deliberative Public Opinion in Presidential Primaries: Evidence from the Online Deliberative Poll", the Voice and Citizenship Conference (2004), University of Washington
- Jeong, Jeong Hwa, "The Successful Conditions of the Public Deliberation for Social Consensus Building", Korean Journal of Policy Science, 22(1), pp.101~124 (2018)
- List, C., "Deliberation, Single-peakedness, and the Possibility of Meaningful Democracy : Evidence from Deliberative Polls", The Journal of Politics, 75(1), pp.80~95 (2013)
- Moon, Tae Hyeon, "The Logic and Limitation of The Deliverative Policy Making", Journal of Korean Public Administration, 22(3), pp.629~650 (2010)
- Neblo, A., "Who Wants to Deliberate and Why?", American Political Science Review, 104(3), pp.566~583 (2010)
- Norris, P., "Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Rapid Review: The Feasibility of Online Citizens’ Assembly to Support Devon’ Transition to Bet Zero, "Sandover, K.", University of Exeter, ~ (2020)
- Showers, E., "Equality of Participation Online Versus Face to Face: An Analysis of the Community Forum Deliberative Methods Demonstration", SSRN Electronic Journal (2015)[DOI]
- Strandberg, K., "The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy" (2018), Oxford University Press
- Sunstein, C., "Debating Deliberative Democracy" (2003), Blackwell Publishing
- Sunstein, R., "Going to Extremes : How Like Minds Unite and Divide" (2009), Oxford University Press
- Witschge, T., "Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal through the Internet" (2004), Routledge
- Yoon, Jong-Seol, "Research on Democratic Conflict Management Evaluation Model:Focusing on the Process of Participation, Deliberation, and Consensus", Proceedings of the Korean Association for Policy Studies Annual Conference (2013)