퍼블릭도메인의 확보를 위한 복제권의 해석 - 서울고법 2010. 10. 13 선고, 2010나35260 판결과 관련하여 -
The Reproduction Right for Securing Public Domain
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this article is to propose a market-based test for the infringement of the reproduction right, which can preserve public domain as well as the inventive to create. The nature of copyright is a statutory monopoly, which purports to nurture public domain by providing authors with incentives to create. This article argues that the original nature of copyright as a tool for fertilize public domain should be restored. For this argument, this article first introduces a recent Korean copyright case, in which the plaintiff uploaded a clip showing his 5 year-old-girl singing and dancing a popular song. Next, this article proves that, at first, the copyright was held infringed only when the defendant’s use displaces the copyright holder’s market demand. But, this article also shows that the copyright holders’ legislative lobby had shifted the nature of copyright from statutory monopoly to proprietary right. This article finally argues that the court should play a major role in balancing between the protection and use of copyright to secure public domain to achieve the purpose of copyright.
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to propose a market-based test for the infringement of the reproduction right, which can preserve public domain as well as the inventive to create. The nature of copyright is a statutory monopoly, which purports to nurture public domain by providing authors with incentives to create. This article argues that the original nature of copyright as a tool for fertilize public domain should be restored. For this argument, this article first introduces a recent Korean copyright case, in which the plaintiff uploaded a clip showing his 5 year-old-girl singing and dancing a popular song. Next, this article proves that, at first, the copyright was held infringed only when the defendant’s use displaces the copyright holder’s market demand. But, this article also shows that the copyright holders’ legislative lobby had shifted the nature of copyright from statutory monopoly to proprietary right. This article finally argues that the court should play a major role in balancing between the protection and use of copyright to secure public domain to achieve the purpose of copyright.
참고문헌 (14)
- 배대헌, "현행 저작권법상 디지털 저작물 보존과 문화․산업발전의 관계", 산업재산권, (32), pp.155~192 (2010), 한국산업재산권법학회
- 저작권위원회, "한국저작권 50년사" (2007)
- 최경수, "저작권법 개론" (2010), 한울아카데미
- Brylawski, E. Fulton, "6 Legislative History of the 1909 Copyright Act PART S", pp.4~ (1976)
- Netanel, Neil Weinstock, "Copyright‘s Paradox", ~ (2008)
- Patterson, L. Ray, "Folsom v. Marsh and Its Legacy", J. Intell. Prop. L, 5, pp.431~ (1998)
- Patterson, L Ray, "A Unified Theory of Copyright", Hous. L. Rev, 46, pp.215~ (2009)
- Patterson, L. Ray, "The Nature of Copyright: A Law of Users’ Rights", ~ (1991)
- Ryan, Michael P., "Knowledge Diplomacy: Global Competition and the Politics of Intellectual Property", ~ (1998)
- "대법원 2010.3.11. 선고, 2009다5643 판결", ~ (2010)
- "대법원 2003.4.11. 선고, 2002도3445 판결(‘FUJIFILM 판결’)", ~ (2003)
- "서울고법 2010.10.13 선고, 2010나35260 판결", ~ (2010)
- "서울남부지법 2010.2.18 선고, 2009가합18800 판결", ~ (2010)
- 구본권, "5살 꼬마 동영상도 저작권 침해?: 음악저작권협 ‘포털 블라인드’ 과잉행사 논란", 한겨레신문, 2009.6.24, ~ (2009)
