고아 저작물과 저작권법의 목적 - 구글 도서 프로젝트에 대한 분석을 포함하여
Orphan Works and the Purpose of Copyright Law - With the Analysis of Google Book Project
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
An orphan work is defined as a situation where the owner of copyrighted work cannot be identified and located by someone who wishes to make use of the work in a manner that requires the permission of the copyright owner. Recently, an orphan work has attracted attention due to the Google book project. However, the Google book project is just one example of many cases where copyrighted works cause problems to be used in the industry. If someone wants to use copyrighted works, he/she has to have permission from owners of copyrighted works in advance. However,it is usually hard for a potential user to find out a owner of a copyrighted work due to inadequate information and the change of ownership during copyright term. Moreover, extension of copyright term accelerates such difficulty. Google book project is a plan to digitalize all books in the world. The first problem that Google met was to obtain permissions from each right holder. The conflicts between Google and right holders developed into a law suit. Right holders claimed copyright infringement, but Google insisted non-infringement based on fair use. The case finally ended with preliminary settlement which was amended later. However, ultimately, the settlement cannot resolve orphan work problems and the U.S. Copyright Office issued a Report on Orphan Works. This Copyright Office's recommendation were incorporated into the Orphan Works Act of 2006, Copyright Modernization Act of 2006 and Orphan Works Act of 2008, but were never adopted as law. Korean copyright law has a compulsory license clause for orphan works and orphan works problems have received less attention in Korea than in the U.S. However, that does not mean that the compulsory license clause has no problem at all. Recently, Korean copyright law was amended to include industrial development as its purpose. Regardless of plausibility of industrial development as a copyright purpose, copyright law must increase user's accessibility to copyrighted works in order to accomplish its purpose, industrial development. Accordingly, the compulsory license clause for orphan works shall be reviewed from such a perspective.
Abstract
An orphan work is defined as a situation where the owner of copyrighted work cannot be identified and located by someone who wishes to make use of the work in a manner that requires the permission of the copyright owner. Recently, an orphan work has attracted attention due to the Google book project. However, the Google book project is just one example of many cases where copyrighted works cause problems to be used in the industry. If someone wants to use copyrighted works, he/she has to have permission from owners of copyrighted works in advance. However,it is usually hard for a potential user to find out a owner of a copyrighted work due to inadequate information and the change of ownership during copyright term. Moreover, extension of copyright term accelerates such difficulty. Google book project is a plan to digitalize all books in the world. The first problem that Google met was to obtain permissions from each right holder. The conflicts between Google and right holders developed into a law suit. Right holders claimed copyright infringement, but Google insisted non-infringement based on fair use. The case finally ended with preliminary settlement which was amended later. However, ultimately, the settlement cannot resolve orphan work problems and the U.S. Copyright Office issued a Report on Orphan Works. This Copyright Office's recommendation were incorporated into the Orphan Works Act of 2006, Copyright Modernization Act of 2006 and Orphan Works Act of 2008, but were never adopted as law. Korean copyright law has a compulsory license clause for orphan works and orphan works problems have received less attention in Korea than in the U.S. However, that does not mean that the compulsory license clause has no problem at all. Recently, Korean copyright law was amended to include industrial development as its purpose. Regardless of plausibility of industrial development as a copyright purpose, copyright law must increase user's accessibility to copyrighted works in order to accomplish its purpose, industrial development. Accordingly, the compulsory license clause for orphan works shall be reviewed from such a perspective.
참고문헌 (17)
- 김석훈, "저작권 산업과 불법 저작물 침해 현황", 지적재산권, 28 (2008)
- 박준우, "2차적저작물로의 변형과 공정이용인 변형의 차이 - 표현형식의 변형과 이용목적의 변형", 상사판례연구, 22(4), pp.543~563 (2009), 한국상사판례학회
- 배대헌, "현행 저작권법상 디지털 저작물 보존과 문화․산업발전의 관계", 산업재산권, (32), pp.155~192 (2010), 한국산업재산권법학회
- 송영식, "저작권법개설" (2003), 세창출판사
- 고아 저작물의 이용과 확대된 집중관리 제도, "이영록", Copyright Issue Report, ~ (2010)
- 오승종, "저작권법" (2008), 박영사
- 정진근, "저작권법상 도서관에서의 공정이용에 관한 연구 ―한·미 저작권법을 중심으로―", 창작과 권리, (59), pp.146~182 (2010), 세창출판사
- Alessandra Glorioso, "Google Books: An Orphan Works Solution?", Hofstra L. Rev, 38, pp.971~ (2010)
- Benjamin T. Hickman, "Can You Find A Home For This "Orphan" Copyright Work? A Statutory Solution For CopyrightProtected Works Whose Cannot Be Located", Syracuse L. Rev, 57, pp.123~ (2006)
- Christopher A. Suarez, "Continued DOJ Oversight Of The Google Search Settlement: Defending Our Public Values And Protecting Competition", N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev, 55, pp.175~ (2010)
- Coree Thompson, "Orphan Works, U.S. Copyright Law, And International Treaties: Reconciling Differences To Create A Brighter Future For Orphans Everywhere", Ariz. J. Int'l & Comp. L, 23, pp.787~ (2006)
- Eric M. Fraser, "Antitrust And The Google Books Settlement: The Problem Of Simultaneity", Stan. Tech. L. Rev, 1 (2010)
- John W. Hazard, Jr., "1 Copyright Law in Business and Practice § 6: 5. 50 (rev. ed.)", ~ (2010)
- Racquel C. Callender, "Harmonizing Interest On The Internet: Online And The Music Industry", How. L. J, 48, pp.787~ (2005)
- Richard A. Brait, "Lead Users As A Source Of Innovation", Int'l & Info. Tech, 12, pp.168~ (2004)
- Steven Hetcher, "Orphan Works And Google's Global Library Project", Wake Forest Intell. Prop. L. J, 8, pp.1~ (2007)
- 中山信弘, "著作權法" (2007), 有斐閣
