본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

배타조건부 거래의 위법성 판단기준 - 오픈마켓을 중심으로

The standard of judging illegality of the exclusive dealing - focusing on the "Open market"

0

조회

0

다운로드

11

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

When we decide the relavant market of the internet shopping mall by some points, the "open market" can be separately defined. In that demand-side substitutability could be most important factor. One open market site as market dominant usually abuse its market position, with making exclusive deals with suppliers. The exclusive dealing conditions are exclusive supply contract or not make contract with other competitor. When we judge such behavior, two points should be considered : whether the condition would restrain the freedom of the market player and if the competitor could be excluded or foreclosed from the market by the anti-competitive practice.

Abstract

When we decide the relavant market of the internet shopping mall by some points, the "open market" can be separately defined. In that demand-side substitutability could be most important factor. One open market site as market dominant usually abuse its market position, with making exclusive deals with suppliers. The exclusive dealing conditions are exclusive supply contract or not make contract with other competitor. When we judge such behavior, two points should be considered : whether the condition would restrain the freedom of the market player and if the competitor could be excluded or foreclosed from the market by the anti-competitive practice.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. 차성민, "경제법 판례연구 제5권" (2009), 법문사
  2. 양명조, "경제법강의 제8판" (2010), 신조사
  3. 이남기, "경제법" (2001)
  4. 임영철, "공정거래법" (2008), 박영사
  5. 김성훈, "배타조건부거래의 위법성 요건", 법학논고, (32), pp.241~264 (2010), 법학연구원
  6. 이봉의, "독점규제법 제3조의2 제1항 제5호 후단 “소비자이익 저해행위” 금지의 위헌성 판단 - 명확성의 원칙을 중심으로", 서울대학교 법학, 49(3), pp.241~280 (2008), 법학연구소
  7. 이봉의, "시장지배적 지위남용에 관한 leading case의 검토", 제2회 SNU 경쟁포럼(2008) 발표문 (2008)
  8. 이호영, "공정거래법상 시장지배적사업자 규제의 재점과 과제", 저스티스, (104), pp.75~99 (2008), 한국법학원
  9. 이형규, "오픈마켓 운영자의 권리와 의무", 법학논총, 23(3), pp.221~244 (2006), 법학연구소
  10. 이충훈, "인터넷통신판매중개자의 법적 책임", 선진상사법률연구, (38), pp.24~49 (2007), 법무부
  11. 윤장혁, "양면시장에서의 경쟁 핵심요인 분석:시스템 다이내믹스 접근을 통한 온라인 마켓플레이스 기업을 중심으로", 대한경영학회 추계학술발표논문집 (2006)
  12. 홍대식, "사법적 관점에서 본 불공정 거래 행위", 경쟁법연구, 18, pp.203~243 (2008), 한국경쟁법학회
  13. 배타적 거래 조건부 리베이트에 대한 국내외 위법성 판단기준 비교분석, "홍동표", LEG, ~ (2010)
  14. ABA, "Antitrust law developments" (2005), ABA
  15. Bechtold, "GWB-Kommentar" (2006), C.H.Beck
  16. Elhauge, "United States antitrust law and economics" (2008), Foundation Press
  17. Fall, "The EC law of competition" (2007), Oxford
  18. Hovenkamp, "Federal antitrust policy" (2005), Thomson
  19. Jones, "EC Competition Law" (2007), Oxford
  20. Kling, "Kartellrecht" (2007), Vahlen
  21. O'Donoghue, "The law and economics of article 82 EC" (2006), Hart
  22. 金井貴嗣, "독점금지법" (2008), 홍문당
  23. Report on single branding, "exclusive dealing", ICN
  24. Baker, "Market definition:An analytical overview", Anttrust L.J, 74, pp.129~ (2007)
  25. Saecker, "The concept of the relevant product market" (2008), peter lang
  26. Evans, "Antitrust issues raised by the emerging gloval internet economy", Nw. U. L. Rev, 102 (2008)
  27. Jakobson, "Exclusive dealing, foreclosure, and consumer harm", Antitrust L.J, 70 (2002)
  28. Jakobson, "No economic sense makes no sense for exclusive dealing", Antitrust L.J, 73 (2006)
  29. Melamed, "Exclusive dealing agreement and other exdlusionary conduct - are there unifying principle", Antitrust L.J, 73 (2006)
  30. Rochet, "Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets", J. EUR. ECON. ASS'N, 4 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)