회복적 사법의 이념 구현을 위한 경찰의 경미소년사건처리
Minor Offences Committed by Juveniles and Restorative Justice
3
조회
0
다운로드
31
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Restorative justice is a relatively new paradigm to underscore the need for victims' injuries to be repaired in the criminal justice or juvenile justice systems. From a restorative point of view, juvenile offenders have to take restorative accountability for their offences, and it is also required of them to take action in order to repair the damage which they have incurred. Through these processes they can find the opportunities for personal growth that may reduce the likelihood of repeating delinquencies and/or offences. Therefore, the restorative justice principles are also consistent with the juvenile justice system in Korea. Rehabilitation of juvenile offenders, and reparation of the damage done, could be accomplished more effectively through early restorative interventions, especially as far as juveniles who have committed minor offences are concerned. It is much more desirable to refer them to the diversion programs at the early stage, as opposed to punishing them. Considering that the police officer has first contact with the majority of juvenile offenders, it is crucial to intervene with juveniles at the police stage. To activate these restorative interventions, the granting of police authority is needed to determine the outcome of minor offences, and to also develop programs appropriate for rehabilitating juvenile offenders. Lastly, granting police authority would assist with repairing the injuries sustained by victims and affected communities.
Abstract
Restorative justice is a relatively new paradigm to underscore the need for victims' injuries to be repaired in the criminal justice or juvenile justice systems. From a restorative point of view, juvenile offenders have to take restorative accountability for their offences, and it is also required of them to take action in order to repair the damage which they have incurred. Through these processes they can find the opportunities for personal growth that may reduce the likelihood of repeating delinquencies and/or offences. Therefore, the restorative justice principles are also consistent with the juvenile justice system in Korea. Rehabilitation of juvenile offenders, and reparation of the damage done, could be accomplished more effectively through early restorative interventions, especially as far as juveniles who have committed minor offences are concerned. It is much more desirable to refer them to the diversion programs at the early stage, as opposed to punishing them. Considering that the police officer has first contact with the majority of juvenile offenders, it is crucial to intervene with juveniles at the police stage. To activate these restorative interventions, the granting of police authority is needed to determine the outcome of minor offences, and to also develop programs appropriate for rehabilitating juvenile offenders. Lastly, granting police authority would assist with repairing the injuries sustained by victims and affected communities.
참고문헌 (53)
- Dandurand, Y., "유엔 형사사법 핸드북 회복적 사법 프로그램" (2009), 형사정책연구원
- 高橋則夫, "對話による犯罪解決" (2007), 成文堂
- Zehr, H., "修復的司法とは何か―応報から關係修復へ" (2003), 新泉社
- ジョン, "修復的司法の世界" (2008), 成文堂
- 김용세, "한국의 형사사법체제와 회복적 사법", 형사법연구, (20), pp.347~375 (2003), 한국형사법학회
- 김은경, "회복적 사법 실천모델의 효과성 연구 : 공식소년절차 참여집단과‘대화모임’참여집단 간의 비교연구를 중심으로", 형사정책연구, 20(3), pp.245~277 (2009), 한국형사정책연구원
- 21세기 소년사법 개혁의 방향과 과제(Ⅰ) 제Ⅱ부 새로운 대응방안으로서 회복적 사법의 실제와 전망 -회합 실험연구를 중심으로, "김은경", 형사정책연구원, ~ (2007)
- 21세기 소년사법개혁의 방향과 과제(Ⅱ)회복적 소년사법 실천모델의 효과성 연구, "김은경외", 형사정책연구원, ~ (2008)
- 김혁, "조기 개입을 통한 소년 비행의 예방 - 우범소년과 불량행위소년에 대한 대응방안을 중심으로", 경찰학연구, 10(1), pp.103~130 (2010), 경찰대학
- 김혁, "경찰의 촉법소년 조사에 관한 연구", 경찰학연구, 10(2), pp.97~116 (2010), 경찰대학
- 김현, "형사사법에서의 회복ㆍ참여ㆍ예방 - 검찰실무를 중심으로", 법학논집, 14(2), pp.53~68 (2009), 법학연구소
- 수사기소분리와 경검 상호관계에 대한 비교법적 연구, "박노섭", 경찰청, ~ (2009)
- 오경식, "한국의 回復的 少年司法에 관한 연구", 비교형사법연구, 10(2), pp.513~536 (2008), 한국비교형사법학회
- 오영근, "개정소년법의 과제와 전망", 형사정책연구, 19(2), pp.5~24 (2008), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이동원, "피해자지원센터의 화해중재 프로그램에대한 평가연구", 피해자학연구, 15(2), pp.77~110 (2007), 한국피해자학회
- 이진국, "회복적 사법과 형사사법의 관계에 관한 소고", 피해자학연구, 14(2), pp.69~88 (2006), 한국피해자학회
- 이진국, "회복적 사법의 관점에서 본 형사조정실무의 문제점", 형사정책연구, 19(1), pp.5~31 (2008), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이호중, "헌법재판소 판례로 본 행형과 수용자의 인권- 행형에 대한 헌법적 이해 -", 형사법연구, (22), pp.343~373 (2004), 한국형사법학회
- 이호중, "회복적 사법의 이념과 실무", 법학논집, 14(2), pp.1~27 (2009), 법학연구소
- 太田達也, "犯罪被害者支援の國際的動向と我が國の展望", 法律のひろば, 53(2) (2000)
- 太田達也, "ベルギーにおける修復的司法と矯正の取組み（後）", 刑政, 112(9) (2001)
- 太田達也, "全件送致主義の危機!?簡易送致の行方", 刑政, 119(1) (2008)
- 矯正・更生保護における犯罪被害者の支援, "太田達也", 特定非営利活動法人全国被害者, ~
- 支援ネットワーク, "犯罪被害者支援必携" (2008), 東京法令出版
- 藤本哲也, "ハワード・ゼアの修復的司法の手引き", 法学新報, 116(5) (2009)
- 服部朗, "輕微な非行の取扱い－簡易送致の運用をめぐって", 法律時報, 63(12) (1991)
- 守山正, "リストラティブ․ジャスティスとコミュニティ․ポリシング―イギリスのテムズ․バリ-警察活動を中心に", 現代刑事法, (40) (2002)
- 柴田守, "応報と修復：修復的司法論の再定位", 専修法研論集, (37) (2005)
- 植木百合子, "修復的カンファレンス(少年對話會)モデル․パイロット事業報告書の槪要について", 警察學論集, 61(4) (2008)
- 宇田川公輔, "イギリスの少年司法の動向と少年司法手続の運用状況について", 家庭裁判月報, 61(10) (2009)
- 猪瀬慎一郎, "少年審判制度の基本問題, In 少年法のあらたな展開" (2001), 有斐閣
- 川出敏裕, "少年法における被害者の法的地位", 法學敎室, (121) (2009)
- ピ-タ-, "ゼロ․トレランスと修復的司法, In 修復的司法の總合的硏究" (2006), 風間書房
- Baker, K, "The evaluation of the validity and reliability of the youth justice board's assessment for young offenders-findings from the first two years of the use of ASSET" (2002), Youth Justice Board
- Baker, K., "Futher development of Asset" (2005), Youth Justice Board
- Basemore, G., "Restorative juvenile justice: in search of fundamentals and an outline for systemic reform, In Restorative juvenile justice: repairing the harm of youth crime" (1999), criminal justice press
- Christe, N., "Conflicts as property", The British Journal of Criminology, 17(1) (1977)
- Daly, K., "Restorative justice: the real story", ~ (2001)
- Fox, D., "Restorative final warnings: policy and practice", The Howard Journal, 45(2) (2006)
- Holdaway, S., "The national evaluation of the youth justice board's final warning projects" (2004), Youth Justice Board
- Marshall, T.F., "Restorative justice：an overview", ~ (1998)
- McCold, P., "Toward a holistic vision of restorative juvenile justice: a reply to the maximalist model", Contemporary Justice Review, 3(4) (2000)
- Pitts, J., "The new correcionalism: young people, youth justice and new labour, In Crime, Disorder and Community Safety : a new agenda" (2001), Routledge
- Van Ness, D., "The shape of things to come: a framework for thinking about a restorative justice system", ~ (2000)
- Walgrave, L., "How pure can a maximalist approach to restorative justice remain? Or can a purist model of restorative justice become maximalist", Contemporary Justice Review, 3(4) (2000)
- 경찰청, "2010년 경찰백서" (2010)
- 법무연수원, "2010년 범죄백서" (2010)
- 警察廳, "少年對話會による立直り支援について", 日付け警察廳少發第, (229)
- 最高裁判所事務總局家庭局, "家庭裁判所事件の槪況－少年事件－", 家庭裁判月報, 62(2) (2010)
- 平成17年７月13日付け最高裁家二第000730号家庭局長通達, "簡易送致事件の処理について", 家庭裁判月報, 57(10) (2005)
- Home Office, "Final warning scheme-guidance for the police and youth offending teams", ~ (2002)
- Ministry of Justice, "Code of practice for youth conditional cautions for 16 & 17 year olds", ~ (2010)