소년범의 인권에 관한 고찰
A Study on the Protection of Juvenile Rights
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
New Revised Juvenile Law(2007.12.) seems to open the door tothe development of initiatives generally associated withrestorative justice in Korea. Juveniles should be the target of protection rather thanpunishment even if they commit a crime, because they are animmature being and are easy to be influenced by environment. Nevertheless, There are some challenges to be resolved in orderto operate these new systems(for avoiding especially theencroachment upon personal rights). First, In the investigation system before prosecutors'judgement, the objectivity of evaluation instruments should bemaintained so that the investigation may be done objectively. Second, In the disposition of Juvenile Protection Cases, thecriminal compensation should be introduced, the problem of thepre-trial detention should be resolved, and the transferenceprogram of a juvenile reformatory in the consignment period ofone month should be developed. Third, The Training Programs should be developed in order toenhance expertise of the juvenile prosecutor, juvenile judge andjuvenile investigator. Forth, The Provision which Death penalty or life sentence to ajuvenile who was less than 18 years old, shall be reduced to 15 years should be changed, and besides there are severalproblems(for the Safeguarding(Defending) The Human Rights). Last, that is just the Protection of Juvenile Rights which isinternational agreements, including UNCRC(United NationsConvention on the Rights of the Child) and UNPJP(UNGuidelines for the Prevention Juvenile Delinquency). It is essential for sound fostering of juvenile to handle juvenileoffenders with good intention. The juvenile justice system inKorea is a dual system consisted of the protection cases processand the criminal cases process. If it is desirable to process thejuvenile cases more efficiently, to avoid the side effect such aslabeling and to reduce the over-burden of juvenile justice, it isrecommended to establish the concrete, explict, and detailedcriteria in law and to apply such criteria accurately, thoroughlyand appropriately in practice.
Abstract
New Revised Juvenile Law(2007.12.) seems to open the door tothe development of initiatives generally associated withrestorative justice in Korea. Juveniles should be the target of protection rather thanpunishment even if they commit a crime, because they are animmature being and are easy to be influenced by environment. Nevertheless, There are some challenges to be resolved in orderto operate these new systems(for avoiding especially theencroachment upon personal rights). First, In the investigation system before prosecutors'judgement, the objectivity of evaluation instruments should bemaintained so that the investigation may be done objectively. Second, In the disposition of Juvenile Protection Cases, thecriminal compensation should be introduced, the problem of thepre-trial detention should be resolved, and the transferenceprogram of a juvenile reformatory in the consignment period ofone month should be developed. Third, The Training Programs should be developed in order toenhance expertise of the juvenile prosecutor, juvenile judge andjuvenile investigator. Forth, The Provision which Death penalty or life sentence to ajuvenile who was less than 18 years old, shall be reduced to 15 years should be changed, and besides there are severalproblems(for the Safeguarding(Defending) The Human Rights). Last, that is just the Protection of Juvenile Rights which isinternational agreements, including UNCRC(United NationsConvention on the Rights of the Child) and UNPJP(UNGuidelines for the Prevention Juvenile Delinquency). It is essential for sound fostering of juvenile to handle juvenileoffenders with good intention. The juvenile justice system inKorea is a dual system consisted of the protection cases processand the criminal cases process. If it is desirable to process thejuvenile cases more efficiently, to avoid the side effect such aslabeling and to reduce the over-burden of juvenile justice, it isrecommended to establish the concrete, explict, and detailedcriteria in law and to apply such criteria accurately, thoroughlyand appropriately in practice.
참고문헌 (21)
- 곽병선, "미국의 소년심판절차에 있어서 변호사의 역할", 형사법연구, 19(3-하), pp.833~848 (2007), 한국형사법학회
- 김성언, "소년보호처분의 실효적 실천방안", 개정소년법과 소년사법, 2008년 춘계형사정책 세미나 자료집 (2008), 형사정책연구원
- 김은경, "21세기 소년사법개혁의 방형과 과제(Ⅰ)" (2007), 한국형사정책연구원
- 남선모, "한국 소년교정의 현상과 과제", 소년보호연구, 13, pp.159~188 (2009), 한국소년정책학회
- 류여해, "소년법상 소년사건의 처리방안에 관한 연구", 소년보호연구, 13, pp.285~307 (2009), 한국소년정책학회
- 박영규, "한국교정의 과제" (2014), 열린
- 박찬걸, "소년형사사건의 심판에 있어서 특례조항에 대한 검토- 소년법 제56조 내지 제67조를 중심으로 -", 소년보호연구, 18, pp.127~155 (2012), 한국소년정책학회
- 오영근, "개정소년법의 과제와 전망", 형사정책연구, 19(2), pp.5~24 (2008), 한국형사정책연구원
- 소년사건처리절차의 개선방안에 관한 연구, "오영근", 형사정책연구원, ~ (1995)
- 원혜욱, "개정 소년법의 주요쟁점에 관한 검토-보호대상을 중심으로-", 소년보호연구 (2008), 한국소년정책학회
- 윤용규, "우리나라 소년사법의 운용실태와 개선방안에 관한일고찰", 형사정책연구, 11(4) (2000)
- 이승현, "소년보호이념과 선의권에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2006
- 이승현, "한국 개정 소년법상 소년의 권리보장", 소년보호연구, (11) (2008)
- 개정 소년법시행에 따른 신설제도의 성과분석, "이윤호", ~, pp.소년보호 정책용역 논집, 20-09
- 이진국, "소년보호대상의 범위에 관한 형사정책적 검토", 형사정책연구, 17(1), pp.89~116 (2006), 한국형사정책연구원
- 정희철, "少年法改正의 理論과 現實: 改正試案의 몇 가지 問題點", 중앙법학, 9(1), pp.223~247 (2007), 중앙법학회
- 최병각, "변호인이 조력을 받을 권리와 소년사법", 소년법연구, (창간) (2002), 한국소년법학회
- 최종식, "우범규정의 재 해석", 소년법연구, (2) (2007), 한국소년법학회
- 최종식, "소년비행의 대책에 관한 연구", 형사정책, 19(2), pp.87~113 (2007), 한국형사정책학회
- 한영선, "개정 소년법의 실효성확보방안 ; 1개월이내 소년원송치(8호)처분을 중심으로", 한국범죄학, 2(2) (2008), 대한범죄학회
- 한인달, "한국의 개정 소년법의 주요내용과 동향", 제6회 한중·형법학술심포지움 -소년범죄와 소년사법 - (2008), 한국비교형사법학회
