본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

「1개월 이내의 소년원 송치처분」의 개선방안

A Study On the Problems and the Improvement of the Protective Disposition No.8 in The New Revised Juvenile Act.

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The New Revised Juvenile Act introduces several important provision for juvenile offenders. they are the Protective Disposition(1 month, short time and long time in Juvenile Training School), recommendation toward reconciliation, etc. This Act surpasses Korean current Juvenile Act. both in the protection of Juvenile rights and the improvement of correctional treatment. This studies on the treatment measures in the juvenile reformatory focused on the Protective Disposition No.8Juveniles should be the target of protection rather than punishment even if they commit a crime, because they are an immature being and are easy to be influenced by environment. New Rrevised Juvenile Law was revised in Korea and created provisions to strengthen human rights for juvenile. The Protective Disposition, Juvenile Probation and Parole has been carried out, based on lots of laws and regulations. The recent amendment of Juvenile law will cause a lot of changes for The Protective Disposition, Juvenile Probation and Parole since they are mainly based on Juvenile law. There are neverthless some challenges to be resolved in order to operate these new systems. First, the purpose of The Protective Disposition is to prevent juveniles in the early stage of delinquency from committing recidivism through offering the open treatment based on character-building education. Second, The Training Programs in the Institutionn should be developed in order to enhance expertise of the Juvenile Prosecutor, Juvenile Judge and Juvenile Investigator. Third, to solve these problems, specialized organizations for juvenile delinquent such as Department of Justice should appoint certain private facilities so that the facilities should be intensively managed and supervised. Forth, no rule and standard is not made to deal with yong peaple under the Protective Disposition No.8. Sixth, Protective Disposition No.8 do not considered to produce some problems of the merger with long- term probation, and the expansion of the additional order. Last, for the disposition of Juvenile Protection, should be developed,Individualized treatment, an integral part of institutional programs,intensive short-term treatment and intensive community treatment (attendance center). When the Juvenile Law was revised in 2007, the several dispositions as new protective measures for juvenile were introduced. One of them was the 8th disposition that is to transfer juveniles in a month to juvenile training school. The purpose of this disposition is to prevent juveniles in the early stage of delinquency from committing recidivism through offering the open treatment based on character-building education. From June 2008, the 8th disposition was imposed on juveniles and Daedeok juvenile training school started to operate the special program "Didimdol Academy" for 8th disposition inmates. This study is an analysis of the operating result of the 8th Disposition(in conclusion, proved that the 8th disposition is an effective measure for juveniles in early stage of delinquency) and suggests the alternatives to improve the effectiveness of the Protective Disposition.

Abstract

The New Revised Juvenile Act introduces several important provision for juvenile offenders. they are the Protective Disposition(1 month, short time and long time in Juvenile Training School), recommendation toward reconciliation, etc. This Act surpasses Korean current Juvenile Act. both in the protection of Juvenile rights and the improvement of correctional treatment. This studies on the treatment measures in the juvenile reformatory focused on the Protective Disposition No.8Juveniles should be the target of protection rather than punishment even if they commit a crime, because they are an immature being and are easy to be influenced by environment. New Rrevised Juvenile Law was revised in Korea and created provisions to strengthen human rights for juvenile. The Protective Disposition, Juvenile Probation and Parole has been carried out, based on lots of laws and regulations. The recent amendment of Juvenile law will cause a lot of changes for The Protective Disposition, Juvenile Probation and Parole since they are mainly based on Juvenile law. There are neverthless some challenges to be resolved in order to operate these new systems. First, the purpose of The Protective Disposition is to prevent juveniles in the early stage of delinquency from committing recidivism through offering the open treatment based on character-building education. Second, The Training Programs in the Institutionn should be developed in order to enhance expertise of the Juvenile Prosecutor, Juvenile Judge and Juvenile Investigator. Third, to solve these problems, specialized organizations for juvenile delinquent such as Department of Justice should appoint certain private facilities so that the facilities should be intensively managed and supervised. Forth, no rule and standard is not made to deal with yong peaple under the Protective Disposition No.8. Sixth, Protective Disposition No.8 do not considered to produce some problems of the merger with long- term probation, and the expansion of the additional order. Last, for the disposition of Juvenile Protection, should be developed,Individualized treatment, an integral part of institutional programs,intensive short-term treatment and intensive community treatment (attendance center). When the Juvenile Law was revised in 2007, the several dispositions as new protective measures for juvenile were introduced. One of them was the 8th disposition that is to transfer juveniles in a month to juvenile training school. The purpose of this disposition is to prevent juveniles in the early stage of delinquency from committing recidivism through offering the open treatment based on character-building education. From June 2008, the 8th disposition was imposed on juveniles and Daedeok juvenile training school started to operate the special program "Didimdol Academy" for 8th disposition inmates. This study is an analysis of the operating result of the 8th Disposition(in conclusion, proved that the 8th disposition is an effective measure for juveniles in early stage of delinquency) and suggests the alternatives to improve the effectiveness of the Protective Disposition.

참고문헌 (56)

  1. 강경래, "소년원 처우의 실효성 확보방안 -8호 처분과 일본의 특수단기처우와의 비교검토를 중심으로", 소년보호연구, 14, pp.53~74 (2010), 한국소년정책학회
  2. 강동구, "소년범에 대한 시설내 처우 및 사회내처우의 연계성 강화방안", 소년보호 논집, (7) (2006), 법무부 보호국
  3. 곽병선, "미국의 소년심판절차에 있어서 변호사의 역할", 형사법연구, 19(3-하), pp.833~848 (2007), 한국형사법학회
  4. 김성돈, "우리나라 소년법의 검사선의주의모델의 개선방안", 저스티스, (88), pp.189~210 (2005), 한국법학원
  5. 김성언, "소년보호처분의 실효적 실천방안", 형사정책연구, 19(2)통권 : 7, pp.25~62 (2008), 한국형사정책연구원
  6. 김용세, "교정단계에서의 회복적 서법의 가능성, 연구충서, In:한국형사정책연구원. 소년범에 대한 중간처우제도 도입에 관한 예비 연구" (2006), 법무부
  7. 김은경, "21세기 소년사법 개혁과 회복적 사법의 가치", 형사정책연구, 18(3), pp.1159~1188 (2007), 한국형사정책연구원
  8. 21세기 소년사법개혁의 방향과 과제 Ⅱ, 한국형사정책연구원 보고서, "김은경", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2008)
  9. 문정민, "受講命令制度의 現況과 改善策", 矯正硏究, 38, pp.57~82 (2008), 한국교정학회
  10. 박달현, "현행 소년법상 보호처분의 문제점과 개선방안", 矯正硏究, 36(36), pp.149~173 (2007), 한국교정학회
  11. 소년범에 대한 중간처우제도 도입에 관한 예비연구, "박미숙", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2006)
  12. 박미숙, "법무부 소년법개정안 토론문, 소년법 개정법률안 공청회 자료집", 법무부, ~ (2007)
  13. 성우제, "8호처분의 운영성과 분석", 소년보호연구, 14(14), pp.1~52 (2010), 한국소년정책학회
  14. 성우제, "소년보호행정의 변화전략", 제10회 소년보호학술대회 발표자료 (2006), 법무부보호국 소년제2과
  15. 심재무, "한국소년보호제도의 문제점과 그 개선방안", 제6회 한중·형법 학술심포지움 -소년범죄와 소년사법 (2008), 한국비교형사법학회
  16. 염기창, "소년보호처분의 실질적 강화방안, 가사소년제도개혁위원회 자료집" (2005), 가사소년제도개혁위원회
  17. 오영근, "개정 소년법의 과제와 전망", 2008년 춘계 형사정책세미나 자료집 (2008), 한국형사정책연구원
  18. 오영근, "사회봉사명령의 신동향", 矯正硏究, 35, pp.47~77 (2007), 한국교정학회
  19. 원혜욱, "소년법 개정안 개요, 소년법 개정법률안 공청회 자료집", 법무부, ~ (2007)
  20. 원혜욱, "개정소년법의 주요쟁점에 관한 검토 - 보호대상을 중심으로", 소년보호연구, (11) (2008), 한국소년정책학회
  21. 이순래, "소년사법의 현황과 소년범죄에 대한 대응전략", 형사정책연구, 18(3), pp.1047~1080 (2007), 한국형사정책연구원
  22. 이승현, "한국 개정 소년법상 소년의 권리보장", 소년보호연구, (11) (2008)
  23. 이승현, "소년보호이념과 선의권에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2006
  24. 이승현, "소년원의 처우방안에 대한 연구 - 8호처분을 중심으로", 한국형사정책연구원
  25. 이옥, "검사선의주의와 법원선의주의", 소년보호연구, (8) (2005)
  26. 이윤호, "개정소년법시행에 따른 신설제도의 성과분석, 소년보호 정책용역 논집" (2009)
  27. 이정주, "최근 소년법개정과 소년보호관찰제도의 과제", 소년보호연구, (11) (2008), 한국소년정책학회
  28. 이진국, "소년보호대상의 범위에 관한 형사정책적 검토", 형사정책연구, 17(1), pp.89~116 (2006), 한국형사정책연구원
  29. 이춘화, "소년조사제도론" (2007), KSI 한국학술정보
  30. 장영민, "21세기 형사사법개혁의 방향과 대국민 법률서비스 개선방안(소년법의 문제점과 개선방안)" (2004), 한국형사정책연구원
  31. 정유희, "검사 결정전 조사 실무기법제언", 보호, 통권 : 19 (2007), 법무부
  32. 정희철, "少年法改正의 理論과 現實: 改正試案의 몇 가지 問題點", 중앙법학, 9(1), pp.223~247 (2007), 중앙법학회
  33. 최인섭, "우리나라 재범예방프로그램의 실태와 개선방향", 한국형사정책연구원
  34. 최종식, "제6차 소년법개정의 문제점에 관한 고찰", 형사정책, 20(1), pp.351~376 (2008), 한국형사정책학회
  35. 한숙희, "촉법소년 연령인하에 따른 가정법원의 역할과 과제", 형사정책연구, 19(2), pp.63~92 (2008), 한국형사정책연구원
  36. 한영선, "개정소년법의 실효성확보방안 ; 1개월이내 소년원송치(8 호)처분을 중심으로", 한국범죄학, 2(2) (2008), 대한 범죄학회
  37. 한인달, "한국의 개정소년법의 주요내용과 동향", 제6회 한중·형법 학술심포지움 -소년범죄와 소년사법 (2008), 한국비교형사법학회
  38. 菊田幸一, (2009)
  39. 平野龍一, "講座少年保護Ⅱ" (2005)
  40. 澤登俊雄, "展望少年法(3)" (2002)
  41. 猪懶愼一郞, "編少年法のあらたな展開" (2002)
  42. 八田次郞, "非行少年の敎育と處遇", ~ (2005)
  43. 石川政興, "少年非行と法" (2001)
  44. 關哲夫, "少年法の解說" (2008), 一橋出版
  45. 田宮裕, "注釋少年法" (2009), 有斐閣
  46. "久木元伸少年法等の一部を改正する法律について", 警察学論集, 60(8) (2007)
  47. "斎藤義房国会審議中の少年法改正法案の問題点", 自由と正義, 58(3) (2007)
  48. 川淵健司, "少年法改正の意義 ①裁判所の視点から", 法律ひろば, 60(10) (2007)
  49. "後藤弘子少年法の理念と社会感情, 少年法の展望" (2000), 現代人文社
  50. 澤登俊雄, "少年法入門第2版" (2002)
  51. 森田宗一, "少年保護の基礎理念, In:少年非行と少年保護" (1960)
  52. 菊田幸一, "少年法槪說第4版" (2003)
  53. 小川太郞, "刑事政策の新展開" (2004)
  54. 加藤久雄, "ボ-ダ-ルヌ時代の刑事政策", ~ (1995)
  55. 八木國之, "新派刑法學の現代的展開", ~ (1984)
  56. 平野龍一, "講座少年保護Ⅲ", ~ (1993)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)