과학기술발전에 따른 리스크·위험방지를 위한 국가의 안전보호의무
National Safety Protection Obligation to Prevent Risk · Danger caused by Development of Science-Technology
0
조회
0
다운로드
24
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
Today, development of science-technology gives people bountiful life, but the serious environmental disruption that it makes can threaten safety of lives and bodies of people. For example, AI, BSE, SARS, GMO, and accidents related to nuclear power generation, foods, medicine etc threaten safety of lives and bodies of people. The greatest subject in modern societies with technological development is decisively to guarantee the safety connected directly with human life. Namely, the theory to guarantee safety of people from Risiko and Gefahr caused by the technological development should be advanced through law-theoretical dogma in public law. So a matter of safety which is caused by an abundance that technological development brought is investigated to systematize law-theoretical dogma in public law. In Korea, the notion of Risiko and Gefahr is not precise. Therefore the notion of Risiko and Gefahr in German, the notion of Risiko of Niklas Luhmann, Murswiek's, the notion of Risiko of Drews/Wacke/ Vogel/Matens, the notion of Risiko three steps model of R. Breuer, the criticism of Risiko three steps model of R. Breuer of U. Di Fabio, and the notion of Risiko of O. Lepsius are analyzed. The theory of national protection obligation as theoretical ground develops on the basis of “Grundrechts auf Sicherheitthe[=fundamental rights from safety]” of Professor J. Isensee. Based on the theory of national protection obligation in constitution “Übermaßverbot” applies to concrete measures to protect the freedom of the enterpriser in the science and technology- safety administration law (Atomic Energy Act, Building Act, Pharmaceutical Affairs Act, Food Sanitation Act, Genetic Technology Act, and so on) which is embodied law of the constitution, and whether people's safety is protected or not legislates optimizing measures through “Untermaßverbot”. In particular, “Untermaßverbot” as a counterproposal is presented to a legislator by the judgement standard that guarantees safety connected directly with human life.
참고문헌 (23)
- 김남진, "위험의 방지와 리스크의 사전배려", 고시계, 통권 : 613, pp.50~58 (2008)
- 김중권, "리스크사회에서의 약사법의 위상", 의약품법규학회지, 1(1), pp.16~19 (2006), 한국의약품법규학회
- 김중권, "藥事法上의 新藥의 許可와 再審査에 관한 硏究", 중앙법학, 8(3), pp.31~80 (2006), 중앙법학회
- 이종영, "국가의 후세대 보호의무와 유정공학의 안전성", 공법연구, 30(1), pp.48~ (2001), 한국공법학회
- 李 鍾 永, "食品安全性確保와 食品規制의 한계", 중앙법학, 6(4), pp.33~57 (2004), 중앙법학회
- 이홍구, "불확실성시대에 있어서의 리스크관리에 관한 연구", 법학논집, 31, pp.33~ (1996), 한양대학교 법학연구소
- Beck, U., "Risikogesellschaft- Auf dem weg in eine andere Moderne-" (1986), Suhrkamp Verlag
- Brenner, M., "Das Risiko im öffentlichen Recht", DÖV, pp.1024~1026 (2003)
- Breuer, R., "Anlagensicherheit und Störfälle- Vergleichende Risikobewertung im Atom- und Immissionschutzrecht", NVwZ, pp.213~ (1990)
- Di Fabio, U., "Risikoentscheidungen im Rechtsstaat", ~ (1994)
- Isensee, J., "Das Grundrecht auf Sicherheit", ~ (1983)
- Klein, K. O., "Das Untermaßverbot-Über die Justiziabilität grundrechtlicher Schutzpflichterfüllung", JuS, pp.961~ (2006)
- Krings, G., "Grund und Grenzen grundrechtlicher Schutzansprüche", ~ (2003)
- Lepsius, O., "Risikosteuerung durch Verwaltungsrecht: Ermöglichung oder Begrenzung von Innovationen?", VVDStRL, 63, pp.264~266 (2004)
- Lindner, J. F., "Theorie der Grundrechtsdogmatik", ~ (2005)
- Mackeben, A., "Grenzen der Privatisierung der Staatsaufgabe Sicherheit" (2004), Baden-Baden
- Michael, L., "Die Argumentationsstrukturen des Grundsatzes der Verhältnismäßigkeit -Zur Dogmatik des Über- und Untermaßverbotes und der Gleichheitssätze", Jus, pp.148~ (2001)
- Möstl, M., "Die staatliche Garantie für die öffentliche Sicherheit und Ordnung", ~ (2002)
- Nitz, G., "Private und öffentliche Sicherheit", ~ (2000)
- Poscher, R., "Grundrechte als Abwehrrechte", ~ (2003)
- Sofsky, W., "Das Prinzip Sicherheit" (2006), Fischer
- Stoll, P.-T., "Sicherheit als Aufgabe von Saaat und Gesellschaft", ~ (2003)
- Unruh, P., "Zur Dogmatik der grundrechtlichen Schutzflichten", ~ (1996)