과학기술법연구의 회고와 전망

Abstract

It might be neglect of responsibility for lawyers to have an attitude that studying science and technology belongs to the realm of scientists not lawyers, under the circumstance that new problems are continuously arising and new regulations are continuously enacting, revising and repealing according to scientific innovations. Equally, it might be neglect of responsibility to think that studying science and technology law is none of scientists' business at all. And it is not appropriate idea that science and technology law could be handled by scientists and policy planners of science and technology, because science and technology law is deeply concerned with science and technology policy science. Science and technology law could be sufficiently developed through the joint research of law, natural science, economics, business administration, public administration, sociology, philosophy, ethics, psychology etc. To cope with the difficulties concerning Korean science and technology law, it is necessary to take systematic and academic approaches studying science and technology law totally, instead of traditional method of studying individual law case by case. From this viewpoint, this article concentrates on the necessity and feasibility of jurisprudence in science and technology law and problems to overcome.